Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for MSTC FlashCard

Channel

MSTC FlashCard

@MSTCFlashcards

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,759subscribers

-104 since we began measuring on 6 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001242082335
TypeChannel
Username@MSTCFlashcards
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 September 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/MSTCFlashcards

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 2 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

3,7593,8633,8116 September 2026 — 3,863 subscribers6 September 2026 — 3,863 subscribers9 September 2026 — 3,853 subscribers13 September 2026 — 3,858 subscribers16 September 2026 — 3,843 subscribers2 October 2026 — 3,815 subscribers8 October 2026 — 3,805 subscribers13 October 2026 — 3,796 subscribers17 October 2026 — 3,787 subscribers20 October 2026 — 3,784 subscribers23 October 2026 — 3,777 subscribers26 October 2026 — 3,771 subscribers30 October 2026 — 3,768 subscribers2 November 2026 — 3,762 subscribers5 November 2026 — 3,759 subscribers6 September 20265 November 2026
15 measurements spanning 61 days, net -104. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,743–3,879 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 18:293,759-3
2 Nov 2026, 11:363,762-6
30 Oct 2026, 03:203,768-3
26 Oct 2026, 21:313,771-6
23 Oct 2026, 17:573,777-7
20 Oct 2026, 11:093,784-3
17 Oct 2026, 06:283,787-9
13 Oct 2026, 23:193,796-9
8 Oct 2026, 18:393,805-10
2 Oct 2026, 03:163,815-28
16 Sept 2026, 21:003,843-15
13 Sept 2026, 02:213,858+5
9 Sept 2026, 00:163,853-10
6 Sept 2026, 12:453,863no change
6 Sept 2026, 02:473,863first reading

Engagement

Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

👸 ICTQUEEN 👑
@ICTQUEENFLASHCARD · 22,203
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 September 2026
JadeCap’s Trading Room
@jademastersabode · 20,788
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 25 September 2026
Trader Theory
@tradertheory · 31,605
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MSTC FlashCard” (@MSTCFlashcards), 3,759 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MSTCFlashcards.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.