2 measurements taken within a single day, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 531–533 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
31 Aug 2026, 15:35
533
+2
30 Aug 2026, 19:30
531
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 12 March 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 44s
Average length
56s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
394 reactions across 18 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
84
21.3%
😁
76
19.3%
❤
68
17.3%
😐
28
7.11%
custom 5364233059702937499
27
6.85%
custom 5388699491228464986
27
6.85%
😢
26
6.60%
🔥
21
5.33%
🤯
18
4.57%
🫡
15
3.81%
😇
4
1.02%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 394 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 12 March 2024 to 4 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔨 ඔයාගෙ dell lap එක no power උනොත්.
Battery එක බෝඩ් එකෙන් ගලවල charger එක ගහන්න charger එක lap එකට plug කරලා තීද්දිම battery එක plug කරන්න. Lap එක on වෙයි 💡
⚠️බලාගෙන හරිත..
❤14👍6😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @MR_gima. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Single Developers </> @SingleDevelopers · 559,253 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 30 August 2026
ThuSh LK @thushlk0 · 129,861 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 30 August 2026
𝗔𝗟 අපි 🇱🇰 @AL_api · 64,274 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 30 August 2026
2024 MAIN REVISION - AP @APMR24 · 37,935 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 31 August 2026
2026 Physics Theory | Darshana Ukuwela @DU26T · 39,067 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 30 August 2026
AP TECHNICAL TEAM @Ap23Tech · 60,694 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 30 August 2026
25 Revision NOTES | AP @ApNotes · 42,226 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 30 August 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tech BY Gima” (@MR_gima), 533 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MR_gima.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
