Channel
@MPSC_CIVILIANS
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,868subscribers
+37 since we began measuring on 26 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002164199368 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MPSC_CIVILIANS |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 26 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MPSC_CIVILIANS |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 31% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2026, 11:52 | 1,868 | -2 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 15:42 | 1,870 | -10 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 06:20 | 1,880 | -5 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 14:01 | 1,885 | +2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 20:17 | 1,883 | +9 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:08 | 1,874 | +34 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 1,840 | +5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:53 | 1,835 | +4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 1,831 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 21 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
74 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 50 | 67.6% | |
| ❤ | 19 | 25.7% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 5.41% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 1.35% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 74 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 21 August 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#MPSC आता तर Prove झाले ना #MPSC नी घेतलेल्या Drugs Inspector पदाचा पेपर हाफ फुटलेला होता... हा कोणी फोडला, कसा फोडला, हे तपासात उघड होईलच... परंतु #MPSC चे अध्यक्ष आणि सचिव ही परीक्षा घेण्यात असमर्थ ठरले... त्यामुळे त्यांनी नैतिक जबाबदारी नाही तर आपण पारदर्शक एक्झाम घेऊ शकत नाही .. या कारणामुळे स्वतःचा राजीनामा द्यावा आणि एखाद्या सक्षम अधिकाऱ्याला त्या ठिकाणी अध्यक्ष आणि सचिव नेमावे... कारण हा अक्षम असा गुन्हा आहे…
💯10
#MPSC चा Drugs Inspector चा Paper leak च्या बातम्या समाज माध्यमावर येत आहेत... ही बातमी खोटी निघावी कारण महाराष्ट्र मधील विद्यार्थी मित्रांचा #MPSC च्या #Transparency वर खूप विश्वास आहे. ही बातमी खोटी निघाली तर सर्वात जास्त आनंद विद्यार्थ्यांना होईल कारण खूप विद्यार्थी आपल्या आयुष्यातली उमीद्दीचे वर्षे #MPSC ला देतात .. पण ह्या बातम्यांमध्ये मध्ये जर काही तथ्य असेल सध्या पोलिस चौकशी चालू आहे चौकशी होईपर्यंत MPSC चे …
हा राज ठाकरे Impact तर नाही ना कारण आज काही #MPSC चे विद्यार्थी यांनी Drugs inspector या पेपर फुटी बद्दल भेट घेतली होती....
💯12❤2
#MPSC Drugs inspector प्रमाणेच #MMRDA (TCS ) & #PMC (IBPS ) या परीक्षांमध्ये सुद्धा खूप मोठ्या प्रमाणात भ्रष्टाचार , अनियमिता झालेली आहे.. त्याचे पुरावे विद्यार्थ्यांनी त्या-त्या विभागाकडे जमा केलेले आहेत.. #MMRDA & #PMC प्रशासनाने आता कुठलीही वाट न बघता.. विद्यार्थी वर्गाचा अंत न बघता #MMRDA JE & #PMC JE या दोन्ही परीक्षा रद्द करून #Re_Exam घ्यावी... आणि जे कोणी दोषी आहेत त्यांच्यावर कठोरातील कठोर कारवाई करावी..…
💯8❤2
#MPSC Drugs inspector चा पेपर फुटला विद्यार्थ्यांनी केलेले आरोप खरे होते.. आणि प्राथमिक तपासात सुद्धा ते निष्पन्न झाले.. #MPSC ची विश्वासार्हता, पारदर्शकता अबाधित राहण्यासाठी..#MPSC नी घेतलेला हा निर्णय खूप कौतुकास्पद आहे... या पेपर फुटी मध्ये जो कोणी दोषी असेल त्याच्यावर कठोरातील कठोर कारवाई व्हावी.. #MPSC
❤2💯2
जाहिरात क्रमांक ११६/२०२५ औषध निरीक्षक, गट ब, अन्न व औषध प्रशासन- भरती प्रक्रिया रद्द करण्याचा निर्णय आयोगाने घेतला आहे. प्रस्तुत जाहिरातीच्या अनुषंगाने आयोगाकडून फेरपरीक्षा आयोजित करण्यात येईल. यासंदर्भातील प्रसिद्धीपत्रक आयोगाच्या संकेतस्थळावर प्रसिद्ध करण्यात आले आहे. https://mpsc.gov.in/announcement_and_circular/4
जेव्हा तुमच्या जवळच्या व्यक्तीचा गैरसमज झालेला असतो तेव्हा गोष्टी clear करून reassurance देण्यात शहाणपणा असतो. परंतु काही लोक ego ला कुरुवाळत बसून मी काही चुकींच केलं नाहीये त्यामुळे मी काही action घेणार नाही असं म्हणून कदाचित त्या जवळच्या व्यक्तीला कायमचं गमावणं prefer करतात.. #Life #Gm
💯15👍2
https://x.com/degree_holders/status/2091774270796173751
https://x.com/degree_holders/status/2091774780479586641
https://x.com/saurabh_pa63954/status/2091767741745377601
आपली Post आपली जबाबदारी. प्रत्येक विद्यार्थ्यांने Mail करा✅ @civilmaharashtra 📎WCD MES 2027 https://tinyurl.com/WCD-MES-VACCANCIES2027 📎DSLR MES 2027 https://tinyurl.com/mvrrccfu 📎PWD MES 2027 https://tinyurl.com/mes-pwd-2027-mail 📎WRD MES 2027 https://tinyurl.com/WRD-MES2027-UPDATED
👍2
https://grievances.maharashtra.gov.in
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @MPSC_CIVILIANS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“📚MPSC CIVILIAN'S📚” (@MPSC_CIVILIANS), 1,868 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MPSC_CIVILIANS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.