Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

нарцисс.

@MMWPJJ

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

76subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003997944349
TypeChannel
Username@MMWPJJ
Created7 July 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/MMWPJJ

Growth

768 August 2026 — 76 subscribers9 August 2026 — 76 subscribers8 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 75–77 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 21:0276no change
8 Aug 2026, 06:3176first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 7 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
176.1%
avg views ÷ 76 subscribers
Avg views / post
134
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
44.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held12 (7 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total1,472
Reactions total566
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 21:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
4
Videos
6

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 10s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

566 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53507491430211578439116.1%
custom 54293853384663668728715.4%
custom 52606985308209532018414.8%
custom 54543578803481102905710.1%
custom 5235918777136216994539.36%
custom 5244509648031092558539.36%
custom 5429452099438015345529.19%
custom 5247062503577387774478.30%
custom 5442724828282909913427.42%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 566reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 11:06 UTC42 views47 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

my main enemy is the camera.

custom 524450964803109255813custom 526069853082095320112custom 54294520994380153458custom 52470625035773877744custom 53507491430211578434custom 52359187771362169942custom 54293853384663668722custom 54427248282829099132

8 Aug 2026, 19:29 UTC56 views49 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

I got depressed again..

custom 524450964803109255815custom 542938533846636687211custom 54294520994380153459custom 52606985308209532017custom 52470625035773877744custom 54427248282829099133

7 Aug 2026, 18:19 UTC66 views50 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

👎👎👎.

custom 523591877713621699415custom 545435788034811029012custom 52445096480310925586custom 53507491430211578435custom 52606985308209532013custom 54293853384663668723custom 54294520994380153453custom 54427248282829099133

6 Aug 2026, 14:19 UTC80 views61 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

𓂅⋆𓍼 𝒦 оллаб @Liackaa § @jjggpqk 𝓕arruh: She said, "Hola, ¿cómo está'? She said, "こんにちは" She said, "Pardon my French" I said,"Bonjour, madame" Then she said, "Sak pasé?" And said, "N'ap boule" No matter where I go, you know l love 'em all 𝓛 ia: ...

custom 535074914302115784315custom 526069853082095320114custom 52445096480310925588custom 52470625035773877745custom 52359187771362169944custom 54293853384663668724custom 54294520994380153454custom 54427248282829099134

5 Aug 2026, 18:24 UTC88 views55 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

☹️ ☹️ ☹️.

custom 535074914302115784315custom 544272482828290991313custom 52359187771362169949custom 52606985308209532016custom 52445096480310925584custom 54293853384663668724custom 54294520994380153454

4 Aug 2026, 12:11 UTC101 views63 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

🎀im dan is my middle name.

custom 545435788034811029014custom 535074914302115784313custom 526069853082095320111custom 52470625035773877748custom 54294520994380153455custom 52359187771362169944custom 54293853384663668724custom 54427248282829099134

2 Aug 2026, 14:09 UTC130 views70 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

JongKook is my love. 🩸🩸

custom 542938533846636687218custom 526069853082095320115custom 535074914302115784314custom 52470625035773877747custom 54294520994380153455custom 54543578803481102904custom 52359187771362169943custom 52445096480310925582

31 Jul 2026, 21:22 UTC205 views71 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

👍👍👍.

custom 542938533846636687221custom 535074914302115784317custom 545435788034811029014custom 52445096480310925585custom 54427248282829099134custom 52470625035773877743custom 54294520994380153453custom 52359187771362169942

31 Jul 2026, 12:03 UTC255 views53 reactionsread 9 August 2026

ищу только мью. ⭐ @jjggpqk @anonkcaPtOor_bot

custom 523591877713621699414custom 526069853082095320110custom 52470625035773877749custom 54293853384663668726custom 53507491430211578435custom 54543578803481102905custom 54427248282829099134

31 Jul 2026, 11:39 UTC244 views47 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩. психолог. занят. свой кф – не имею. к рейд/докс деятельности не отношусь. не отвечаю = не интересуете. кф/ролки/флуд/реклама – бан.

custom 542938533846636687214custom 542945209943801534511custom 52470625035773877747custom 54543578803481102905custom 52606985308209532014custom 53507491430211578433custom 54427248282829099133

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @MMWPJJ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,000,099 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“нарцисс.” (@MMWPJJ), 76 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MMWPJJ.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.