Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Money Maker Fx Reviews

Channel

Money Maker Fx Reviews

@MMFXReviews

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

167subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001322563500
TypeChannel
Username@MMFXReviews
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/MMFXReviews

Growth

167170168.56 August 2026 — 170 subscribers8 August 2026 — 170 subscribers14 August 2026 — 168 subscribers21 August 2026 — 167 subscribers6 August 202621 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 15 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 167–170 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 05:35167-1
14 Aug 2026, 14:55168-2
8 Aug 2026, 15:01170no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:04170first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 22 October 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 August 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2023, 09:21 UTC≈1,460 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

We appreciate our loyal members who renew their subscription because they are making money 💰💰💰

12 Aug 2023, 11:37 UTC≈1,450 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

We appreciate our loyal members who renew their subscription because they are making money 💰💰💰

25 Jun 2023, 10:20 UTC≈1,190 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

We appreciate our loyal members who renew their subscription because they make money 💰

14 May 2023, 13:17 UTC≈1,040 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Thanks for our clients who appreciate our efforts 🙏

25 Feb 2023, 15:33 UTC≈1,060 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Thanks for our clients who appreciate our efforts 🙏

1 Nov 2022, 14:00 UTC702 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Thanks for our clients who appreciate our efforts 🙏

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @MMFXReviews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,420,656 of 1,603,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

testtwo
@testtwo2222222 · 12 posts

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Money Maker Fx Reviews” (@MMFXReviews), 167 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MMFXReviews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.