Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Мужской Журнал | Looks

Channel

Мужской Журнал | Looks

@MLooks

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,349subscribers

-13 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001055055512
TypeChannel
Username@MLooks
Created11 July 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/MLooks

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,3492,3622,355.55 August 2026 — 2,362 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,362 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,361 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,354 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,355 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,352 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,351 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,349 subscribers5 August 202624 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 18 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,347–2,364 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 01:222,349-2
20 Aug 2026, 01:322,351-1
16 Aug 2026, 20:042,352-3
13 Aug 2026, 01:242,355+1
10 Aug 2026, 00:302,354-7
6 Aug 2026, 19:102,361-1
6 Aug 2026, 05:482,362no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:032,362first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 July 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 December 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

201 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍10552.2%
🔥4120.4%
4019.9%
👎83.98%
💊52.49%
🤝20.995%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 201reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2023 to 25 December 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Dec 2023, 17:59 UTC≈14,200 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ДЖЕНТЛЬМЕНЫ НЕ НОСЯТ СМЕШНОЕ Свитшот с аниме? Футболка "с приколом"? Плюшевый брелок или розовая бейсболка? Нет. Нет. Нет. Мужчины покупают экстравагантные вещи, потому что хотят как-то проявить свою смелость. Дескать, смотрите, какая самоироиния - у меня щетина и при этом Пикачу на груди. К сожалению, так не работает - в 99 процентов случаев ты выглядишь, как переросток. Это не значит, что надо одеваться сурово,

👍15🔥4💊3👎21

11 Aug 2023, 16:19 UTC≈16,100 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

?

  1. брюки ⬅️69%
  2. шорты ➡️21%
  3. белые?10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Aug 2023, 16:19 UTC≈15,800 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

белые брюки или белые шорты?

👍7

10 Aug 2023, 13:38 UTC≈14,100 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ДЖЕНТЛЬМЕНЫ НЕ НОСЯТ НОВОЕ Да, все мы любим быть с иголочки, но идеально новая одежда вызывает эффект первоклашки - как будто мама нарядила вас только что и попросила не заляпаться. Да и любой стилист подтвердит — даже самый классный костюм должен пожить на вас какое-то время, чтобы сесть по фигуре. Денди позапрошлого столетия, забрав от портного новый костюм, набивали карманы пиджака камнями и вывешивали обновку п

👍123💊1🤝1

9 Aug 2023, 15:44 UTC≈11,300 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

БЫТЬ НАСТОЯЩИМ СОБОЙ, А НЕ УСПЕШНЫМ ДРУГИМ Fake it till you make it. Изображай, пока не научишься. Тусуйся с богатыми — и станешь богатым. Одевайся, как миллионер. Говори, как миллиардер. Дыши, как Джеф Безос и ходи, как Илон Маск. Давайте честно — так это не работает. Нет ничего более унылого, чем люди, которые пытаются выдать себя за тех, кем не являются. Да, их много на летних верандах дорогих ресторанов: вот де

👍1510🔥4

7 Aug 2023, 14:04 UTC≈7,800 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

И все-таки, шорты - да или нет?

  1. Конечно, да50%
  2. Только в жару и за городом30%
  3. Никогда, шорты для спорта13%
  4. Мои ноги только для жены7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍1

7 Aug 2023, 14:02 UTC≈7,680 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ДЖЕНТЛЬМЕНЫ НЕ НОСЯТ ШОРТЫ? Среди мужчин, следящих за своим стилем, этот спор не стихает уже давно. Уместно ли носить шорты в городе или это все-таки элемент спортивной одежды? Консерваторы считают, что обнажать ноги в городской среде - дурной тон, даже если вы жмете ими триста. Поклонники современных трендов, напротив, уверены - шорты можно носить всегда и везде, в том числе с пиджаком или тяжелыми ботинками. Наш

👍31

31 Jul 2023, 17:24 UTC≈7,630 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ТЫ ДОЛЖЕН БЫЛ САМ Если говорить о претензиях, которые я получал от женщин, то с большим отрывом лидирует вот эта: «Почему мне нужно тебя о чём-то просить? Ты должен был сам это сделать-понять-догадаться-почувствовать!» Мальчики, знакомо? До боли знакомо. Психотерапия научила нас (в теории), что партнёры должны говорить о своих желаниях максимально открыто, но в жизни (на практике) во время разговора на повышенных т

🔥7👍6👎21💊1

Signed Павел Осовцов

29 Jul 2023, 10:47 UTC≈5,580 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ДЖЕНТЛЬМЕНЫ ВЫБИРАЮТ: ТЕРРИ ГИЛЛИАМ На этих выходных советуем вам провести время с одним из лучших британских режиссеров. Терри Гиллиам начал свой путь как один из участников легендарного шоу "Монти Пайтон", а в итоге стал создателем своего уникального киноязыка - с помощью самых фантастических сюжетов он говорит о том, что волнует каждого из нас. Вы наверняка смотрели "Страх и ненависть в Лас-Вегасе" или "12 обезь

👍9🔥31

28 Jul 2023, 14:32 UTC≈5,220 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ДЖЕНТЛЬМЕНЫ ЗАВОДЯТ ДРУЗЕЙ Знаете, как всегда покупать лучшее мясо на рынке? Подружиться с мясником. В наше время, когда даже соседи здороваются с трудом, время и внимание ценятся особенно. Поэтому еще на входе выключаем сложное лицо и немного поболтаем с тем, кто уже скоро будет отдавать лучшие куски для стейков только вам. Тоже самое касается вашей любимой заправки, спортзала или магазина одежды. Здоровайтесь, б

11👍10🤝1

27 Jul 2023, 15:04 UTC≈5,640 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ДЖЕНТЕЛЬМЕНЫ УХАЖИВАЮТ ЗА СОБОЙ Парни, поприветствуем. Сегодня про уход за кожей головы и волосами нам рассказывает создатель бренда мужской косметики REBEL Илья Кузнецов: - важно следить не только за волосами на голове, но и за бородой и щетиной: советую масла брендов Edwin Jager, Morgans, Captain Fawcett - старайтесь избегать сульфатов в шампунях: например, бессульфатный шампунь есть в нашей линейке - Rebel Barb

🔥11👍31

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MLooks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

11 Aug 2023, 16:19 UTCAnonymous Poll680 voters

?

  1. брюки ⬅️69%
  2. шорты ➡️21%
  3. белые?10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Aug 2023, 14:04 UTCAnonymous Poll368 voters

И все-таки, шорты - да или нет?

  1. Конечно, да50%
  2. Только в жару и за городом30%
  3. Никогда, шорты для спорта13%
  4. Мои ноги только для жены7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Jul 2023, 16:44 UTCAnonymous Poll295 voters

какой тебе?

  1. правый ➡️57%
  2. левый ⬅️43%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Jul 2023, 16:28 UTCAnonymous Poll281 voters

👊

  1. бокс40%
  2. карате16%
  3. миксфайт5%
  4. BJJ2%
  5. рукопашный бой15%
  6. вольная/греко-римская8%
  7. кикбоксинг12%
  8. дзюдо10%
  9. муай-тай9%
  10. рукопашный бой10%

The shares total 127%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2023 to 25 December 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,205,870 of 1,602,822entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мужской Журнал | Looks” (@MLooks), 2,349 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MLooks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.