Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 51 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 812–828 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 17:17
824
+1
12 Sept 2026, 12:17
823
-3
4 Sept 2026, 13:38
826
+4
27 Aug 2026, 15:56
822
+5
21 Aug 2026, 08:03
817
+3
14 Aug 2026, 15:55
814
-1
6 Aug 2026, 20:32
815
no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:28
815
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 28 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
170 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
85
50.0%
👍
37
21.8%
🙏
23
13.5%
👏
21
12.4%
🎉
4
2.35%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 170 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 February 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
29
across the posts below
Posts paid on
19
of 20 we hold a reading for · 95%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MKazemiCATC. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 February 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Airport's Operational Category.
What Really Defines an Airport’s Operational Category? ✈️
A common misconception is that an airport's operational category hinges solely on runway length or the mere presence of an Instrument Landing System (ILS). In reality, operational capability emerges from a complex interplay of infrastructure, technology, and sustained readiness.
A 3,000-meter runway is certainly an asset—but …
پرواز در آسمان، رشد در زمین
(دورهای متفاوت برای فرزند شما)
روانشناسی • ستارهشناسی • مشاوره خانواده
فرزندتان را به سفری شگفتانگیز از دنیای درون تا دنیای بیرون دعوت کنید؛
از ژرفای احساسات تا بیکران آسمان.
او میآموزد:
همچون ستارهای پایدار در طوفان احساسات آرام بماند،
مدار آرامش خود را بیابد،
و با تفاوتها دوست شود.
سه روز، سه تحول
روز اول: آسمان بیرون (ستارهشناسی)
روز دوم: آسمان درون (روانشناسی)
روز سوم: آسمان …
🪐🌌 🪐سفری از درون تا کهکشان 🪐🌌🪐
یک دوره متفاوت که در اون هم ستارهشناسی یاد میگیره، هم مهارتهای روان شناسی .
🪐 همراه با رصد زنده خورشید
🧑🏫 مدرس: مهدی کاظمی - کارشناس ارشد روانشناسی و ۱۸ سال فعالیت نجومی .
📍 ظرفیت فقط ۳۲ نفر
📱 برای ثبتنام لطفا با شماره زیر تماس بگیرید: 09184893070
@mkazemicatc
انتشار اطلاعات هوانوردی (AIP) یک جزء اساسی از زیرساختهای هوانوردی است که برای اطمینان از ایمنی و کارایی پروازها طراحی شده است. این اطلاعات بهصورت منظم و ساختاریافته منتشر میشود و شامل جزئیات مهمی از جمله مشخصات فرودگاهها، مسیرهای هوایی، خدمات ناوبری و شرایط جوی میباشد.
چرخه عمر AIP
چرخه عمر AIP شامل مراحل کلیدی زیر است که هر یک به دقت و با توجه به استانداردهای بینالمللی انجام میشود:
1. ایجاد داده (Data Orig…
انتشار اطلاعات هوانوردی
Aeronautical Information Publication(AIP)
یک منبع رسمی است که حاوی اطلاعات دائمی و ضروری در زمینه هوانوردی میباشد. این اطلاعات برای ایمنی، نظم و کارایی ناوبری هوایی در سطوح بینالمللی و داخلی از اهمیت بالایی برخوردار است. AIP توسط سرویس اطلاعات هوانوردی (Aeronautical Information Service یا AIS) هر کشور و مطابق با استانداردهای سازمان بینالمللی هواپیمایی کشوری (ICAO) منتشر میشود.
@mkazemicat…
✈️ ویرایش دوم ✈️
فایل PPT مربوط به انتشارات هوانوردی بر اساس Annex 15، سند 10066 (PANS-AIM) و همچنین سند 8126 ایکائو.
در این فایل، کلیه انتشارات هوانوردی از جمله :
AIP SUP، AIRAC، NOTAM , AIC
مورد بررسی قرار گرفتهاند. همچنین، کلیه قسمتهای مختلف AIP از جمله GEN، ENR و AD نیز به دقت بررسی شدهاند.
@mkazemicatc
نظارت عملکرد ارتفاع در RVSM:
(Height-Keeping Performance Monitoring)
تعریف جامع بر اساس اسناد رسمی ایکائو
📘 تعریف رسمی :
نظارت عملکرد ارتفاع
(Height-Keeping Performance Monitoring)
فرآیندی سیستماتیک برای اندازهگیری، ارزیابی و تأیید دقت نگهداری ارتفاع (Altitude Keeping Performance) هواپیماهای دارای تأییدیه RVSM است. این نظارت، خطای سیستم ارتفاعسنجی
(Altimetry System Error - ASE)
و خطای کل عمودی
(Total Vertic…
Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum (RVSM) در منطقه خاورمیانه (MID)
یکی از مهمترین پروژههای هوانوردی منطقهای است که ظرفیت فضای هوایی پرترافیک این منطقه را به طور چشمگیری افزایش داده است.
۱. تاریخچه و زمان اجرا:
تاریخ اجرای رسمی RVSM در MID:
در ۲۷ نوامبر ۲۰۰۳
آژانس نظارت منطقهای:
MIDRMA (Middle East Regional Monitoring Agency)
مستقر در بحرین
۲. محدوده اعمال RVSM
سطوح پروازی: FL290 تا FL410 (شامل هر دو)
جدا…
RVSM (Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum) به معنای "حداقل جداسازی عمودی کاهش یافته" است و به مجموعهای از مقررات و استانداردها در حوزه هوانوردی اشاره دارد که به منظور افزایش ظرفیت فضای هوایی و بهبود ایمنی پروازها طراحی شدهاند.
در سیستم RVSM، حداقل فاصله عمودی بین پروازهای تجاری در ارتفاعات خاصی (معمولاً بین 29,000 تا 41,000 پا) به 1,000 فوت کاهش مییابد. این در حالی است که در شرایط عادی، حداقل فاصله عمودی 2,000 فو…
❤2👍2👏1🙏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MKazemiCATC. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CNS/ATM, ASBU, CATC❤️” (@MKazemiCATC), 824 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MKazemiCATC.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.