4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,921–5,945 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 00:34
5,937
+13
10 Aug 2026, 06:31
5,924
-16
7 Aug 2026, 04:35
5,940
-2
7 Aug 2026, 00:17
5,942
first reading
Engagement
30 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
49.5%
avg views ÷ 5,937 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,940
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
30
of 30 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held
30 (31 July 2026 – 10 August 2026)
Views total
88,190
Reactions total
3,069
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 03:43 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
3,069 reactions across 30 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,165
70.5%
🙏
320
10.4%
🔥
222
7.23%
💯
77
2.51%
❤🔥
47
1.53%
🥰
43
1.40%
🕊
42
1.37%
👏
26
0.847%
👍
20
0.652%
custom 5296622951544674943
18
0.587%
🤗
18
0.587%
🏆
12
0.391%
🤩
12
0.391%
custom 5969535994867749505
10
0.326%
custom 5357298525765902091
8
0.261%
⚡
8
0.261%
custom 6129660055064153071
4
0.13%
✍
3
0.098%
👀
3
0.098%
🤝
3
0.098%
5 further kinds
8
0.261%
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,069reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 30 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MJJ347Q. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 30 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
GOOD MORNING WONDERFUL PEOPLE. 🤍
Look at the people around you today. At the grocery store. At the traffic lights. On the train. Scrolling their phones. Living in a world that's about to change in ways they can't even comprehend yet.
You already know.
You can't say it. Not yet. You just smile and go about your day carrying a secret so big it changed the way you sleep at night. The way you look at money. The way yo…
1️⃣2️⃣🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠
WONDERFUL PEOPLE. 🤍
12 hours. Final call.
I'm not going to write a long message. You've seen the science. You've read the PDF. You've seen what the chamber does. You've seen the before and after. You know what's in every allocation level. You've had every question answered.
There is nothing left to explain. There is only the decision.
In 12 hours I close this door. And the next time age reversal te…
2️⃣4️⃣🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠
WONDERFUL PEOPLE. 🤍
24 hours.
I'm going to say something I don't say often. I'm asking you to move.
Not because I need you to. Not because the ICO needs it. Because in 24 hours this window shuts and I know... I KNOW... there are people in this channel right now who can afford 250 MJQ and are sitting on the fence thinking maybe tomorrow.
Tomorrow this doesn't exist.
250 MJQ. That's all it takes. 5 …
GOOD MORNING WONDERFUL PEOPLE. 🤍
Can you feel it?
Something shifted. In the last 48 hours. You might not be able to name it yet. But you feel it in your chest. In the air. In the way the news is moving. In the things that are suddenly going quiet that used to be loud. And the things that are suddenly getting loud that used to be silent.
The storm isn't coming anymore.
It's here. 😊
📣 MJ'S CHANNEL
💬 MJ'S CHAT
💬 CH…
4️⃣8️⃣🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠
WONDERFUL PEOPLE. 🤍
48 hours left on the Age Reversal window.
Let me put this simply. Right now... for the price of a dinner out... you can secure 5 sessions that each reverse 20 years of biological age. Your hair. Your skin. Your joints. Your vision. Your energy. Your voice. All of it. Turned back.
After this window closes... these allocations are gone. Not reduced. Not modified. Gone.
The people …
GOOD MORNING WONDERFUL PEOPLE. 🤍
Do you know what makes you dangerous? Not money. Not connections. Not information.
Patience.
The entire old system was designed to make you react. Buy now. Sell now. Panic now. Move now. Every headline. Every notification. Every red banner on every screen. All designed to keep you running on someone else's clock.
But you stopped running. You planted your feet. You said no... I'll …
Quantum Age Reversal Window — what each level unlocks. All ON TOP of existing tier, package, and humanitarian rewards. Only MJQ purchased during this 72-hour window counts.
➖ 250+ MJQ:
5 Age Reversal sessions — 20 years reversed per session
Full biometric scan — telomere verification before and after
90-day post-session cellular stabilisation protocol
1 Quantum Longevity Suite — at-home cellular maintenance
Qua…
GOOD MORNING WONDERFUL PEOPLE. 🤍
I hope you slept well. Because what you're about to read might keep you up tonight. 😊
THE QUANTUM AGE REVERSAL WINDOW — 72 HOURS ONLY
Your body is not designed to age the way it does. The decline you see every year... the joint pain... the fatigue... the grey hair... the wrinkles... the slow deterioration the medical industry taught you was natural... is not natural. It is the resu…
WONDERFUL PEOPLE. 🤍
Sit down for this one.
You’ve seen the devices. You’ve seen the tiers. You’ve seen the humanitarian window. All of that was built on technology that exists in the public domain. Post-quantum encryption. Satellite mesh. Solar cells. Things that are advanced but explainable. Things I could put in a PDF and an engineer could verify.
What I’m about to open is different.
For decades… thousands of p…
WONDERFUL PEOPLE. 🤍
THE HUMANITARIAN WINDOW IS CLOSED. ✔️
It's done. The door is shut. And it's not opening again.
I need you to understand what just happened here. In 72 hours... this community funded more schools, more wells, more hospitals, more rescue operations, more safe houses, and more anti-trafficking infrastructure than most governments commit to in a decade. You did that. Not politicians. Not billionair…
❤65🙏20
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @MJJ347Q. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 19,103 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MJ” (@MJJ347Q), 5,937 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MJJ347Q.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
