8 measurements spanning 18 days, net -25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,681–7,727 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
23 Aug 2026, 20:45
7,697
+11
20 Aug 2026, 00:02
7,686
-20
17 Aug 2026, 10:43
7,706
-4
13 Aug 2026, 10:25
7,710
-3
10 Aug 2026, 00:48
7,713
-5
7 Aug 2026, 04:35
7,718
-4
6 Aug 2026, 06:00
7,722
no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:53
7,722
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 10 March 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
37.5%
avg views ÷ 7,697 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,890
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.89%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026
Posts held
17 (10 March 2024 – 21 August 2026)
Views total
5,780
Reactions total
225
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
25 Aug 2026, 04:53 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
400
Links
91
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
3,013 reactions across 15 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,359
45.1%
😁
580
19.2%
🔥
408
13.5%
❤
369
12.2%
🤝
95
3.15%
🎉
54
1.79%
🤣
20
0.664%
🤩
16
0.531%
🥰
14
0.465%
🗿
13
0.431%
🎄
12
0.398%
👀
12
0.398%
🤔
12
0.398%
👏
9
0.299%
🐳
8
0.266%
💩
7
0.232%
💯
6
0.199%
🥴
6
0.199%
🤡
4
0.133%
🤯
4
0.133%
2 further kinds
5
0.166%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,013reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 10 March 2024 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
331
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 15 we hold a reading for · 80%
Most on one post
261
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MIcryptoV. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 March 2024 to 21 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Это реально. Смотрим, что будет дальше. Самый сильный недельный прирост с 2023 года. Фундамент вы и сами прочитали, полагаю: Трамп провел конфу с участниками крипторынка + сами США удвоили выкуп облигаций Минфином. Лучше поговорим о поведении участников рынка.
В общем, выглядит все очень бодро, рост подхватывают хорошо, а шорт-ликвидации прибавляют скорости росту. Кроме того, ключевую роль играет то, что держателей …
Всем добрейший вечерочек (...NOT*)! Мы все топчемся возле моей зоны последних глобальных покупок BTC, поэтому решил выпустить небольшой апдейт. Хотя апдейт больше будет похож на мольбы удержать $60000, так как ниже этих отметок будет печальная ситуация из-за тяжелой ситуации у крупнейшего держателя BTC - Strategy.
Если кратко: по оценкам, длительное нахождение ниже этой отметки (да и вообще ниже $75000) подрывает их…
Привет всем, реальные 3-4 дня прошло, выкладываю состав своего портфеля + сравнение с динамикой всего рынка альткоинов (в данном случае на графике капа всех альтов, кроме топ-10, но динамика там одна +/-). Несколько оговорок и пояснений:
1. Пока я готовил этот пост (около недели), рынок уже поменялся 3 раза, а нормальный скрин PnL можно делать только с компа, сейчас там падение вместе с рынком и результат примерно +…
Всем привет, сегодня в видео поделился ситуацией с ликвидацией позиции на фьючерсах в лонг с плечом X1. Много было сообщений, что такого не может быть. И я так думал, но, оказывается, может. Дело в механизме ADL, который биржи используют для страхования собственных глобальных рисков при резком падении всего и вся.
На своем счете я работаю только на споте, а вот на копитрейдинге (ссылки не будет, не надо вам это, пов…
Хороший Трамп человек, парой фраз вернул нас в 2017 год, даже слезка ностальгии скатилась. 70% падения по альте за пару часов, потом кратный рост с низов - люди с плечами, наверно, счастливы.
Обычно после такого нас ждет попытка отбоя (чаще неудачная), потом снова снижение, но не настолько сильное как первое, а дальше консолидация примерно на текущих отметках.
Как проснулся - купил MNT 1,71, BTC 111k, SOL 180, LTC …
Привет всем, не прошло и 3-4 дней с обзора по BTC, как я уже готов рассказать вам свой взгляд на рынок альткоинов. Сперва скажу, что я не вот вам великий инвестор в альты и мой личный портфель не сильно опережает рынок. Если я разберусь как заблюрить циферки, то выложу через 3-4 дня пару скринов-сравнений. На картинке график общей капитализации альткоинов.
Так или иначе, как уже ранее говорил в видео - для альткоино…
Всем привет, вот и прошли 3-4 дня (месяца) и, как обещал, прогноз на следующие 365 дней ниже. Пост будет большой, на эту логику я в большой степени ориентируюсь в своих инвестиционных моделях (коих сейчас больше чем краткосрочных). Постараюсь все структурировать, но мб некая степень сумбура будет.
Исходим мы на данный момент из следующих вводных (от самых важных к второстепенным):
1. траектория ставки ФРС переходит …
👍222❤47🎉20😁16🔥14
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @MIcryptoV. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Прошлый план провалился, есть новый план. Шортить?
Да38%
Нет62%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 10 March 2024 to 21 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MI Trading & Analytics (crypto)” (@MIcryptoV), 7,697 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MIcryptoV.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
