β ΠΡ Π΄ΠΎΠ»Π±ΠΎΡΠ±Ρ? β ΠΠ°-Π΄Π°
π₯3π―2β€βπ₯1

Channel
@MILLERSKIE_jk
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry
12subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003046942622 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MILLERSKIE_jk |
| Created | 11 September 2025 β measured β dated from the channelβs first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MILLERSKIE_jk |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 05:41 | 12 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 13 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:01 | 15 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 15 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 11 September 2025 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
163 reactions across 17 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π₯ | 48 | 29.4% | |
| π | 18 | 11.0% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 17 | 10.4% | |
| π³ | 17 | 10.4% | |
| π | 15 | 9.20% | |
| π¦ | 12 | 7.36% | |
| β‘ | 10 | 6.13% | |
| π | 7 | 4.29% | |
| π― | 7 | 4.29% | |
| π | 4 | 2.45% | |
| π | 4 | 2.45% | |
| π | 4 | 2.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 163 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 11 September 2025 to 27 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
β ΠΡ Π΄ΠΎΠ»Π±ΠΎΡΠ±Ρ? β ΠΠ°-Π΄Π°
π₯3π―2β€βπ₯1
π
π₯2β‘1β€βπ₯1π³1π1π1
π
π₯3β€βπ₯1π―1
ΠΠ°ΡΠΎ Π»ΡΠ±ΠΈΠΌΡΠ΅, Ρ-ΠΎΠ±ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅. π₯°
π₯2π2β‘1β€βπ₯1π³1π―1
:)
π³2π2π2β€βπ₯1π1π―1π₯1π¦1
Π― Ρ Π·, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΠΈΡΠ°ΡΡ
π₯4π2π¦2β‘1β€βπ₯1π1π³1π 1
π€·ββοΈ
π₯5π3π¦3β€βπ₯2π2π2β‘1π³1
id: Π½Π°ΡΠ°
π4π₯4β€βπ₯2π¦2β‘1π³1π 1π1
Π½Π΅ Π½Π°ΡΡΠΆΠ°ΡΡΡ, ΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠΌΡ ΡΡΠΎ Π±ΡΡΡ Π½Π°ΠΌΠΈ Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π±Π΅ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·:>
π₯5β€βπ₯2π2π2π¦2β‘1π³1π 1
Sexπ₯
π₯5π2β‘1β€βπ₯1π³1
π«£
π₯3π³2β€βπ₯1π1π1
π¬ | πΝΜ½πΝΜ½πΝΜ½πΝΜ½πΝΜ½πΝΜ½πΝΜ½πΝΜ½πΝΜ½πΝΜ½ pinned Β«ΠΠ½ΡΠΎΠΊΠ°Π½Π°Π» Β«ΡΡк»»
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @MILLERSKIE_jk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@MILLERSKIE_jk named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπ¬ | πΝΜ½πΝΜ½πΝΜ½πΝΜ½πΝΜ½πΝΜ½πΝΜ½πΝΜ½πΝΜ½πΝΜ½β (@MILLERSKIE_jk), 12 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MILLERSKIE_jk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.