Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Encāntaďora

@MILID7X

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

100subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002198673942
TypeChannel
Username@MILID7X
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/MILID7X

Growth

1001021017 August 2026 — 101 subscribers7 August 2026 — 102 subscribers9 August 2026 — 102 subscribers14 August 2026 — 100 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 100–102 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 15:28100-2
9 Aug 2026, 10:02102no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:15102+1
7 Aug 2026, 14:19101first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 30 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

58 reactions across 5 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 51908124593629646141119.0%
custom 5303389316037245131813.8%
custom 5197569928978265984712.1%
custom 5420641356282365942712.1%
custom 530550211352935810158.62%
custom 544939456889620536258.62%
custom 530768734564492196146.90%
custom 546563193327691044446.90%
custom 595194747243043699146.90%
custom 533481249936562126923.45%
custom 544751562378341794611.72%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 58reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 30 January 2026 to 20 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 May 2026, 10:40 UTC210 viewsread 9 August 2026

кого кикнул из приватки пардон https://t.me/+Jrz8X_Izv8YyZGQy я забыл кто там еще был, кто хочет заходите

Signed 𝐆𝐋𝐀𝐃𝐈𝐀𝐓𝐎𝐑

3 May 2026, 12:29 UTC289 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed 𝐆𝐋𝐀𝐃𝐈𝐀𝐓𝐎𝐑

3 May 2026, 12:29 UTC289 viewsread 9 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed 𝐆𝐋𝐀𝐃𝐈𝐀𝐓𝐎𝐑

9 Mar 2026, 22:37 UTC438 viewsread 9 August 2026

i’m high 🧪

Signed 𝐆𝐋𝐀𝐃𝐈𝐀𝐓𝐎𝐑

9 Mar 2026, 22:33 UTC427 views20 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩 8th March has ended

custom 51908124593629646146custom 53033893160372451316custom 54206413562823659425custom 53055021135293581013

Signed 𝐆𝐋𝐀𝐃𝐈𝐀𝐓𝐎𝐑

8 Mar 2026, 09:29 UTC366 viewsread 9 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed 𝐆𝐋𝐀𝐃𝐈𝐀𝐓𝐎𝐑

2 Mar 2026, 16:08 UTC384 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

навязчивые бывшие

custom 51908124593629646145custom 53033893160372451312custom 53055021135293581012

Signed 𝐆𝐋𝐀𝐃𝐈𝐀𝐓𝐎𝐑

2 Mar 2026, 16:08 UTC326 viewsread 9 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed 𝐆𝐋𝐀𝐃𝐈𝐀𝐓𝐎𝐑

8 Feb 2026, 21:29 UTC380 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 53076873456449219614custom 54656319332769104443custom 54206413562823659422custom 53348124993656212691

Signed 𝐌𝐈𝐋𝐃𝐈𝐗 𝐏𝐑𝐀𝐘

8 Feb 2026, 21:20 UTC344 viewsread 9 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

Signed 𝐌𝐈𝐋𝐃𝐈𝐗 𝐏𝐑𝐀𝐘

7 Feb 2026, 07:48 UTC333 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 51975699289782659843custom 54493945688962053623custom 59519474724304369913custom 53348124993656212691custom 54656319332769104441

Signed 𝐌𝐈𝐋𝐃𝐈𝐗 𝐏𝐑𝐀𝐘

7 Feb 2026, 07:48 UTC312 viewsread 9 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed 𝐌𝐈𝐋𝐃𝐈𝐗 𝐏𝐑𝐀𝐘

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @MILID7X. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 983,137 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Encāntaďora” (@MILID7X), 100 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MILID7X.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.