9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -44. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,088–16,146 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 23:22
16,095
-8
13 Aug 2026, 14:38
16,103
-4
12 Aug 2026, 10:58
16,107
-5
11 Aug 2026, 13:35
16,112
-3
10 Aug 2026, 12:52
16,115
-7
9 Aug 2026, 15:13
16,122
-5
8 Aug 2026, 15:44
16,127
-9
7 Aug 2026, 17:12
16,136
-3
7 Aug 2026, 11:31
16,139
first reading
Engagement
53 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.73%
avg views ÷ 16,095 subscribers
Avg views / post
923
53 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
53
of 53 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held
53 (30 July 2026 – 15 August 2026)
Views total
48,899
Reactions total
2,209
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 04:33 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈6,500
Videos
≈4,240
Links
≈1,180
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
12m 22s
Average length
41s
Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,209 reactions across 53 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
427
19.3%
🤬
258
11.7%
👍
197
8.92%
🔥
192
8.69%
😡
188
8.51%
😭
156
7.06%
🤮
150
6.79%
❤🔥
116
5.25%
❤
77
3.49%
👏
63
2.85%
😢
55
2.49%
😁
51
2.31%
👻
44
1.99%
💔
44
1.99%
🫡
36
1.63%
✍
34
1.54%
🥱
34
1.54%
🎉
27
1.22%
🕊
21
0.951%
👀
11
0.498%
9 further kinds
28
1.27%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 53 of the 53 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,209reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 53 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MHuseinGaza. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 53 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Innalillahi wainna ilaihi Rooji'uun
Telah terjadi gempa pagi tadi dengan kekuatan M : 7,7 dan kedalaman yg sangat rendah sekali, 15km. Sehingga kerusakan bangunan ada di mana-mana dan jalan-jalan tertutup longsor akibat gempa.
Gempa dirasakan di NTB, NTT, SULSEL, SULTRA.
Semoga Allah menjaga saudara-saudara kita disana
🚫Aktris Meksiko Melissa_Barrera:
Dukungan saya terhadap Palestina dan Gaza telah menyebabkan saya menghadapi konsekuensi profesional, seperti dipecat dari film "Scream" dan dimasukkan ke dalam "daftar hitam" di Hollywood.
Kehaluan Teroris Netanyahu
🚫Netanyahu: "Ini adalah Dataran Golan. Bendera Israel berkibar di sini, dan akan terus berkibar di sini karena ini adalah tanah kita.
Israel merilis pembunuhan mereka dengan bangga dan mengatakan bahwa yg mereka bunuh dalam video tsb mengancam mereka dan terafiliasi dengan Hamas
Semoga Allah menimpakan azab bagi seluruh pemimpin dan rakyat Israel yg menjajah Palestina
🚫Saluran 15 Israel:
Serangan di Gaza dilakukan dengan persetujuan kepala staf militer, sementara minggu lalu, serangan seperti itu dilakukan dengan persetujuan pejabat dari tingkat …
Postingan kakek Trump di medsosnya
🚫Amerika Serikat memiliki kendali penuh atas Selat Hormuz. SAYA PIKIR KITA AKAN MEMPERTAHANKANNYA! Blokade Angkatan Laut kita disebut oleh semua orang sebagai "TEMBOK BAJA," dan Iran tidak dapat berbuat apa-apa. Mereka tidak memiliki Angkatan Laut, mereka tidak memiliki Angkatan Udara, tentara mereka yang tersisa tidak dibayar, IRGC telah hancur dan melarikan diri, dan "Kepemimpina…
LinkedIn akan menutup operasional R&D-nya di Israel dan memecat hampir seluruh timnya yang berjumlah sekitar 50 orang, mengakhiri keberadaan pusat di Tel Aviv yang didirikan setelah akuisisi perusahaan rintisan analitik Israel, Oribi. Setelah Akuisisi Oribi Seharga $80–90 Juta
Penutupan ini merupakan perubahan drastis dari sebuah kesepakatan yang seharusnya membangun kehadiran pengembangan permanen LinkedIn di Israe…
🚫🚫Israel Hayom:
Sekitar 30 pemimpin dan prajurit wanita di pangkalan Gdnac Sdei Bokir mengalami mual, diare, dan kram perut dalam beberapa hari terakhir.
Menurut informasi yang tersedia, pelatihan dihentikan hari ini karena penyebaran penyakit di antara para prajurit dan pemimpin wanita, yang telah menjalani serangkaian pemeriksaan medis di dalam pangkalan dalam beberapa jam terakhir.
Sementara itu, sebuah bus yan…
Seorang jurnalis Israel melalui saluran i24NEWS berbahasa Ibrani mengatakan:
"Orang Amerika menerima banyak pukulan dan menyembunyikannya agar tidak terpaksa membalas, dan ini adalah tanda-tanda kelemahan yang dilihat oleh orang-orang Iran."
👍23🤣13🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 53 posts we hold for @MHuseinGaza. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 163,748 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@MHuseinGaza named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@eli_hirschmann named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Muhammad Husein Gaza” (@MHuseinGaza), 16,095 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MHuseinGaza.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.