Channel
@MGTOW4
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
328subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001626078320 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MGTOW4 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MGTOW4 |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Oct 2026, 11:56 | 328 | +1 |
| 2 Oct 2026, 12:18 | 327 | -1 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 23:40 | 328 | -2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 22:14 | 330 | +1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:38 | 329 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 06:03 | 330 | -4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 334 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:42 | 337 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 338 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
3 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 2 | 66.7% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
If bleeder working outside means she is 'independent', why are men still shamed for supposedly not valuing muh housewife work? Why is Chamitabh lecturing everyone constantly on the value of the work of housewife and how it's tougher than men's work (haan bhai, dihadi mazdoor to maze mein hai), and why does the kotha want to put a price on it? They demean it themselves, ask everyone to become 'independent', then shame…
💯1
Men watch vanilla porn (normal porn) the most. In most free and freemium porn sites you will find a separate category called “porn for women” which contains lesbian and all the deranged stuffs. Infact women watch fetish contents the most (prego porn, breastfeeding porn, CFNM, scat, gore and bdsm stuff etc). We all know women are aroused by story and fetish contents provide story more than performance. There are res…
🔥2
Another reason
Reason why society prefers male child
There are RWingers too who support venom, but there are radical Honda shernis who want to dox him in hatred. Why is that? A certain section in RW has started talking about कालनेमि। I think they should see who the real कालनेमि is today (apart from the ones on top), lingering around in female form, getting the attention of RW simps, masquerading as hondutva warriors.
Women have love-hate relationship with Venom 😂
चुल्लू भर पानी में डूब के मर जाओ सब
This is the guy simpodas and ₹@@nds want to 'retaliate' against and 'expose' because he disrespects women and 'tells them what to do'. Yes, the man who is respecting motherhood. The entire mIsOgYnY brigade is built on lies on projection.
Absolutely 💯 Who will hate a guy whose pinned post is about mother being the most beautiful woman in the world?! Only foids and their petcat simplodas who don't value motherhood are pissed at Venom 😂
You can clearly see just how obsessed and butthurt they have been by Venom. He lives in their head rent free 🤣 Now notice the two pictures p00₹@ndi posted. Do they look like the same guy? Did the p00j££ta even get this?
Someone else posts another pic and says that is the real one. Yet another negates the claim of simpoda pratik on him posting Venom's actual pics.
The pic seems to talk about two people but nobody is talking about the first one, only venom. He's likely rolling in unrelated people.
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @MGTOW4. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MGTOW” (@MGTOW4), 328 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MGTOW4.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.