Channel

-

@MG70D

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

15subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1003930776465
Type	Channel
Username	@MG70D
Created	1 May 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded	11 August 2026
Last confirmed live	11 August 2026
Measurements held	2
On Telegram	t.me/MG70D

Growth

2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14–16 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
11 Aug 2026, 23:45	15	no change
9 Aug 2026, 00:15	15	first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 1 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos: 2
Links: 1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Telegram Stars

Stars received: 50; across the posts below
Posts paid on: 2; of 4 we hold a reading for · 50%
Most on one post: 25; single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MG70D. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 5 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 May 2026 to 23 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 390,218 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

idv ᴋᴜʀsᴠᴀɪ.
@kursvai · 361 post GOLD
@MG16t · 1341 post

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

GOLD
@MG16t · 1341 post ͖܀ઍ 𝐒̶̴̷𝐏̸̴̶𝐍̷̸̴ ♰ ᵖᵒᵈˢˡᵘˢʰᵃⁿᵒ 𝐀𝐋𝐁𝐕ઍ
@podslushanospn · 831 post Ġ0LDHUB
@SPNVRT · 1161 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“-” (@MG70D), 15 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MG70D.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.

-