Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

GOLD

@MG16t

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

134subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003500950591
TypeChannel
Username@MG16t
Descriptionhttps://t.me/MG70D Анон — @b3nlbot
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/MG16t

Growth

1347 Aug 2026, 19:31 — 134 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 00:15 — 134 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 19:319 Aug 2026, 00:15
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 133–135 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 00:15134no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:31134first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
74.7%
avg views ÷ 134 subscribers
Avg views / post
100
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held18 (28 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total1,802
Reactions total219
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 00:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
15
Videos
13
Links
6

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 12s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

219 reactions across 15 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53236802920267288363315.1%
custom 54676175009528185483214.6%
custom 52109275349668697763013.7%
custom 52109875743146998802310.5%
custom 53304532965387327492210.0%
custom 5325750350299284373188.22%
custom 5258510266458467161156.85%
custom 5386538336699585924146.39%
custom 5420433003123870051115.02%
custom 537536943745507297062.74%
custom 543632174930411529862.74%
custom 543365094966089638131.37%
custom 542043244477812151320.913%
custom 526974451363037832010.457%
custom 540927658075935910510.457%
custom 541791594183501733610.457%
custom 543841514642895468310.457%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 219reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
77
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 18 we hold a reading for · 56%
Most on one post
34
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MG16t. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC35 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @LOKXLOKPhoto

нету идей для видео? ✈️тогда тебе в канал Kursvai. здесь ты найдешь множество идей для своих видео. 🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️ 🔵так же идет набор в администрацию. всю информацию о на боре можно найти тут @infokursvai ссылка на канал - t.me/kursvai

custom 54676175009528185482custom 52109875743146998801custom 53304532965387327491

7 Aug 2026, 23:43 UTC51 views27 reactions34 Starsread 9 August 2026
Video

😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀

custom 53236802920267288369custom 52109875743146998807custom 53257503502992843735custom 52109275349668697763custom 52697445136303783201custom 53865383366995859241custom 54092765807593591051

7 Aug 2026, 23:42 UTC51 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Ты гладишь меня, говоря, что все ОНИ 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤. Мы ебемся сутки на пролет👍 В обшарпанной квартире.

custom 53236802920267288363custom 52585102664584671611custom 53304532965387327491custom 54676175009528185481

7 Aug 2026, 17:36 UTC56 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Напишите пожалуйста названия каких-нибудь любимых ОЧЕНЬ спокойных песен, мне надо

custom 52585102664584671611custom 53304532965387327491custom 54676175009528185481

6 Aug 2026, 18:16 UTC79 views22 reactions12 Starsread 9 August 2026
Video

🔹ollab w Angel.

custom 53257503502992843736custom 52109275349668697765custom 54676175009528185483custom 52585102664584671612custom 53304532965387327492custom 53865383366995859242custom 52109875743146998801custom 53236802920267288361

5 Aug 2026, 21:48 UTC83 views21 reactions10 Starsread 9 August 2026
File

I tell you that I'm thinking about. ⛔️Whatever you're thinking about. Tell me something that I'll forget And you might have to tell me again..👋 It's crazy what you'll do for a friend

custom 52109275349668697766custom 54676175009528185486custom 53304532965387327494custom 52109875743146998801custom 52585102664584671611custom 53236802920267288361custom 53257503502992843731custom 53865383366995859241

5 Aug 2026, 21:37 UTC70 views12 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @mg11gl

Когда она ответит, я исчезну на неделю👍 🤙 Каждой хорошей девчонке нужно по суперзлодею.

custom 54676175009528185484custom 53865383366995859243custom 52109875743146998802custom 52585102664584671611custom 53236802920267288361custom 53304532965387327491

5 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC86 views18 reactions5 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Ору, я жертва педофилок

custom 52109275349668697764custom 53304532965387327494custom 54676175009528185484custom 53257503502992843732custom 52109875743146998801custom 52585102664584671611custom 53236802920267288361custom 53865383366995859241

5 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC78 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 52109875743146998801custom 52585102664584671611custom 54676175009528185481

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @MG16t. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 368,513 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“GOLD” (@MG16t), 134 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MG16t.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.