Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for MARKETPLACE REVIEWS

Channel

MARKETPLACE REVIEWS

@METHMARKETREVIEWS

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Cite this entry

14subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002659744987
TypeChannel
Username@METHMARKETREVIEWS
Created18 June 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 October 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged4 times, most recently 4 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/METHMARKETREVIEWS

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 1 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

141514.57 August 2026 — 15 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14 subscribers7 August 202631 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 24 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14–15 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 05:0314-1
11 Aug 2026, 23:3015no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:3415first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 18 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2025, 01:39 UTC123 viewsread 11 August 2026

🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤 😎 Orders : @MethMarketSG 📣 Page: @MethMarketReviews 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ❄️ ❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❄️ “Soi Cowboy Thailand” 1.25 grams ➡️ $ 98 2.50 grams ➡️ $ 178 5.00 grams ➡️ $ 288 🤩 ❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️🤩 “Compressed Buds - Runtz” 5.00 grams ➡️ $ 88 10.0 grams ➡️ $ 148 🌟 ❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️🌟 • USDT 3.5ML ➡️ $ 80 / Pod • P.P 3.5ML ➡️ $ 75 / Pod • VCA 2.5ML ➡️ $ 65 / Pod…

25 Jun 2025, 00:42 UTC183 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Cold review from a first time customer! What are you waiting for? Come get your fix now!

20 Jun 2025, 17:27 UTC224 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Successful cold drop 💯 DM @MethMarketSG to get your fix!

19 Jun 2025, 17:00 UTC220 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Need we say more? Thank you for your kind words 🔫🔫🔫🔫🔫 🔫🔫🔫

19 Jun 2025, 06:00 UTC210 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Another review by a first time customer. Come get your stocks from us, we’re sure you won’t regret it!

18 Jun 2025, 02:15 UTC203 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

First few orders successfully done. Come pm @methmarketsg for your supplies

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @METHMARKETREVIEWS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MARKETPLACE REVIEWS” (@METHMARKETREVIEWS), 14 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/METHMARKETREVIEWS.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.