Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Неврология | Докмед для врачей | MD.school

Channel

Неврология | Докмед для врачей | MD.school

@MDschool_neurology

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,978subscribers

+2,162 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001909622300
TypeChannel
Username@MDschool_neurology
DescriptionТелеграм-канал для неврологов🧠 Курсы: 🔹 Амбулаторная неврология - https://goo.su/hkH13a 🔹 Детская неврология - https://goo.su/FcNNU 🔹 Экстренная неврология - https://goo.su/2CiQR 🔹 Эпилепсия на приеме - https://goo.su/uayFVSi
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/MDschool_neurology

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

13,81615,97814,8977 August 20267 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 91 days, net +2,162. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,492–16,302 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 01:4715,978+3
6 Nov 2026, 04:1715,975+22
5 Nov 2026, 00:4015,953-5
4 Nov 2026, 03:2515,958+13
3 Nov 2026, 04:0915,945+18
2 Nov 2026, 04:5015,927+36
1 Nov 2026, 03:2615,891+20
31 Oct 2026, 01:4715,871+25
30 Oct 2026, 03:0915,846+40
29 Oct 2026, 02:5615,806+23
28 Oct 2026, 01:3115,783+43
27 Oct 2026, 04:1715,740+58
26 Oct 2026, 04:0815,682+35
25 Oct 2026, 02:2815,647+52
24 Oct 2026, 00:0615,595+42
23 Oct 2026, 00:1915,553+53
21 Oct 2026, 21:5615,500+33
20 Oct 2026, 16:3515,467+3
19 Oct 2026, 19:3115,464+13
18 Oct 2026, 17:5815,451first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.46%
avg views ÷ 15,978 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,190
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held40 (31 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total11,914
Reactions total203
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 05:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
997
Videos
48
Links
515

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
26s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

739 reactions across 40 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤25834.9%
🔥14920.2%
👍13918.8%
🤔11715.8%
✍202.71%
😁182.44%
👏81.08%
💊50.677%
🎉40.541%
👻40.541%
😭40.541%
🫡40.541%
😎30.406%
🎃20.271%
💯20.271%
😱10.135%
🤝10.135%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 739 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 40 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MDschool_neurology. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 40 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 10 posts held from the last 30 days (10.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 11:47 UTC549 views6 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

🏥 Грантовая поддержка для студентов и ординаторов — половину стоимости курса ОПЛАЧИВАЕМ ЗА ВАС! Ординаторы и студенты медицинских вузов России и СНГ теперь могут получить дополнительное образование в MD. School, а мы оплачиваем 50% стоимости! 💡 Это шанс обучаться у ведущих экспертов, оплачивая только половину цены. Что можно выбрать прямо сейчас: 🔥 Амбулаторная неврология — практический курс для тех, кто хочет у…

❤4👍1🔥1

5 Nov 2026, 13:17 UTC903 views23 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Правильный ответ: Рилузол Обоснование Рилузол — единственный препарат, доказанно продлевающий жизнь при боковом амиотрофическом склерозе. Он ингибирует высвобождение глутамата, что снижает нейротоксичность. Используется с целью замедлить нейродегенерацию, не устраняет симптомы, но продлевает выживаемость. Неверные варианты: ❌Пиридостигмин: применяется при миастении, улучшает передачу нервно-мышечного импульса, но …

❤15👍5🔥3

5 Nov 2026, 07:57 UTC972 views69 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Быстрая клиническая задачка🔥 Женщина, 58 лет. Жалуется на тяжесть и скованность в ногах, судороги, трудности при письме и застёгивании пуговиц. Симптомы прогрессируют 4–5 месяцев. На осмотре: фасцикуляции рук, слабость мелких мышц кистей, в ногах — гипертонус и усиленные рефлексы. Походка спастическая, равновесие нарушено. Какой препарат способен продлить жизнь пациентке? 🔥 — Пиридостигмин ❤️ — Ботулинический токс…

👍56🔥6👏4❤2🤝1

4 Nov 2026, 09:55 UTC≈1,090 views16 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

🔥 Сразу 8 новых практических гайдов для неврологов! Забирайте все! Мы подготовили и добавили в курс «Амбулаторная неврология» 8 больших гайдов, которые получат все участники обучения. Что внутри? 1️⃣Атаксия: дифференциальная диагностика Как по клиническим признакам и неврологическому осмотру определить предполагаемый уровень поражения и выстроить диагностический поиск? 2️⃣Головокружение: дифференциальная диагнос…

❤10🔥4👏2

3 Nov 2026, 11:26 UTC≈1,220 views32 reactionsread 7 November 2026
File

✏️ Забирайте памятку «Боль в спине: как правильно сформулировать диагноз вместо "остеохондроза"» Подготовили ее по запросу учеников MD. school, чтобы помочь разобраться в современных формулировках диагнозов при боли в спине. «Остеохондроз» до сих пор часто встречается в медицинских заключениях. Но за этим диагнозом могут скрываться совершенно разные состояния: от неспецифической боли в пояснице до радикулопатии и с…

👍21❤7🔥4

2 Nov 2026, 11:58 UTC≈1,270 views14 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

«Почему я не спросил об этом сразу?»😏 Знакомая мысль после сложного приёма? Пациент уже ушёл, а вы прокручиваете в голове его жалобы, результаты обследований и понимаете: один дополнительный вопрос мог изменить диагностическую гипотезу. Но кто покажет врачу, на каком этапе он упустил важную деталь или выбрал не самую удачную тактику? 🔥 Теперь такую обратную связь можно получить в клиническом тренажёре с ИИ, котор…

❤9🔥3🎉2

1 Nov 2026, 07:29 UTC≈1,510 views10 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

😆😀🥲😆😅🥹😍🥰 Подборка полезных и интересных постов для неврологов↩️ Новые исследования ⬅️ Четырехкратное увеличение риска когнитивных нарушений при СДВГ ⬅️ Новый метод визуализации для исследования мозга и поведения ⬅️ Противоэпилептические препараты и эффективность гормональной контрацепции Рекомендации по диагностике и лечению 💬 5 ресурсов, которые мы сами открываем Памятки и гайды ⬅️ Депрессивная псевдодеменция…

❤6👍2🔥2

31 Oct 2026, 13:12 UTC≈1,450 views11 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Хэллоуин по-неврологически 🎃 Сегодня время страшных историй! Расскажите в комментариях: 🖤Самый жуткий случай из практики — когда реально было не по себе. 🖤Или наоборот — самый смешной случай, от которого страшно только смеяться. Лучшие истории — в наш внутренний топ хорроров невролога 🌟 __ #md_neurology

👻4❤3🎃2👍2

31 Oct 2026, 07:07 UTC≈1,530 views11 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Иногда самая большая ошибка — начать лечить эпилепсию, которой у пациента нет. А иногда — не распознать её там, где ЭЭГ не дала очевидного ответа. ✳️Пароксизмальные состояния — одна из тех тем, где врачу недостаточно «посмотреть ЭЭГ и назначить препарат». Нужно собрать клинику, отличить эпилептический приступ от его имитаций, правильно классифицировать его — и только потом выбирать терапию. 🔥 Именно этому посвящён…

👍6🔥3❤2

30 Oct 2026, 07:14 UTC≈1,420 views11 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Противоэпилептические препараты могут снижать эффективность гормональной контрацепции💡 Некоторые противоэпилептические препараты способны снижать эффективность гормональных контрацептивов. Это лекарственное взаимодействие особенно важно учитывать при планировании беременности: отдельные противоэпилептические средства связаны с риском неблагоприятного воздействия на развивающийся плод, а снижение надежности контрацеп…

❤7✍2👍1🔥1

2 Sept 2026, 08:32 UTC621 views8 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

В 25+ лет никто не ведёт вас на линейку. Но сентябрь всё ещё ощущается как начало нового этапа 🍂 И если этой осенью хочется увереннее чувствовать себя именно на амбулаторном приёме, сейчас один из лучших моментов начать: 🔥до 6 сентября курс «Амбулаторная неврология» — от 16 900 ₽ вместо 24 900 ₽. Это программа для ситуаций, которые невролог встречает постоянно: 🔸когда жалоба знакомая, а вариантов слишком много; 🔸к…

👍4❤2🔥2

1 Sept 2026, 14:59 UTC844 views10 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

😆😀🥲😆😅🥹😍🥰 Подборка полезных и интересных постов для неврологов↩️ Новые исследования ⬅️ Иммунные клетки кишечника могут помочь объяснить, как истощение В-клеток контролирует рассеянный склероз ⬅️ Большинство людей с атипичной болезнью Альцгеймера могут не иметь права на новые методы лечения ⬅️ Исследование живой ткани мозга: электрическая стимуляция меняет нейроны человека Рекомендации по диагностике и лечению 💬 С…

❤5🔥3👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @MDschool_neurology. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@MDschool_neurology edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
1 September 2026
Most recent edit
1 September 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 5 posts on @MDschool_neurology as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
10 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
25 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

MD.school | Медицинский онлайн-университет | Доказательная медицина
@medicina_discendi · 21,254
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 25 September 2026
Неврология и Психиатрия
@neurology_and_psychiatry · 19,570
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 30 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Неврология | Докмед для врачей | MD.school” (@MDschool_neurology), 15,978 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MDschool_neurology.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.