Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 明帝端口官方频道

Channel

明帝端口官方频道

@MDMHZS

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

46,209subscribers

+1,003 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002757208760
TypeChannel
Username@MDMHZS
Description下载官网:https://171.214.11.111:88
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/MDMHZS

Growth

45,20646,20945,707.513 August 2026 — 45,206 subscribers13 August 2026 — 45,258 subscribers14 August 2026 — 45,607 subscribers16 August 2026 — 46,013 subscribers17 August 2026 — 46,209 subscribers13 August 202617 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 5 days, net +1,003. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 45,056–46,359 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 18:5246,209+196
16 Aug 2026, 14:3446,013+406
14 Aug 2026, 20:2745,607+349
13 Aug 2026, 09:0645,258+52
13 Aug 2026, 06:0245,206first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.4%
avg views ÷ 46,209 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,030
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.704%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held22 (6 August 202616 August 2026)
Views total168,630
Reactions total1,187
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 23:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
154
Videos
12
Links
10

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
48s
Average length
48s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,187 reactions across 21 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍90776.4%
12810.8%
🤓262.19%
🤡181.52%
🖕151.26%
🤣151.26%
🤮110.927%
😍100.842%
😁90.758%
😎80.674%
🤩80.674%
🔥60.505%
🤬60.505%
❤‍🔥50.421%
😭50.421%
🌭30.253%
🤔30.253%
👎20.168%
😢10.084%
🫡10.084%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,187reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC≈3,010 views76 reactionsread 17 August 2026

➡️兄弟们离线调整伪离线 记得更新离线规则 ➡️很多人只更新免白规则不更新其他两个规则 ➡️一直说切换离线没有网络就是这个原因

👍5812🖕3😎2🫡1

Signed 帝 明

16 Aug 2026, 10:25 UTC≈3,440 views74 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Poll

准备想开发另外一个端口 投票决定吧

  1. PUBG端口43%
  2. iOS端口8%
  3. 无畏契约端20%
  4. 三角洲解密端30%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍615🌭3🤓2😍1😎1😢1

Signed 帝 明

15 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC≈4,300 views81 reactionsread 17 August 2026

明帝②号频道准备发私端卡 @mdtgck

👍72😎53🔥1

Signed 帝客服 明

15 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTC≈4,730 views87 reactionsread 17 August 2026

➡️公益恢复 发包工具卡了刚刚

👍705🤣5😍4🤮2🖕1

Signed 帝客服 明

14 Aug 2026, 02:49 UTC≈6,100 views83 reactionsread 17 August 2026

➡️规则已经调整 按照上一次投票结果调整 不敢保证所有人稳定 但是以投票知道大概的结果了 记得更新规则

👍6410😍5🤓4

Signed 帝客服 明

11 Aug 2026, 16:04 UTC≈9,120 views51 reactionsread 17 August 2026

➡️私端规则已经调整不会网络异常10分钟了

👍426😁3

Signed 帝客服 明

11 Aug 2026, 15:57 UTC≈8,890 views34 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

乱穿了

👍304

Signed 帝客服 明

11 Aug 2026, 12:29 UTC≈7,740 views41 reactionsread 17 August 2026

➡️认真投票 我看看那个思路好一点

👍383

Signed 帝客服 明

11 Aug 2026, 12:29 UTC≈7,740 views47 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Poll

前几天端口稳一点 还是今天稳一点

  1. 前几天稳一点45%
  2. 昨天凌晨➕今天稳一点55%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍387😁2

Signed 帝客服 明

11 Aug 2026, 11:14 UTC≈7,660 views55 reactionsread 17 August 2026

➡️明帝公益端口 ➡️明帝公益注入 ➡️数据号授权号 ➡️公益文件 官网网盘:明帝.cn

👍32🤡144🤓4🔥1

Signed 帝客服 明

11 Aug 2026, 10:45 UTC≈7,920 views52 reactionsread 17 August 2026

➡️部分人反馈切换离线规则会没有网络 那就一直用免白连打即可 我自己测试没有问题 因为离线吃宽带 网络不好的人 切换离线没有第一时间把数据发到服务器导致链接不上网络 ➡️免白规则也调整了全火 部分人可以用离线觉得离线稳就继续离线

👍299🖕6🤡4🔥2🤩2

Signed 帝客服 明

9 Aug 2026, 12:22 UTC≈9,420 views56 reactionsread 17 August 2026

端口公益有两个版本 新版本UI验证不了就去官网下载老公益端13.0 默认浏览器设置成via就行

👍39🤩6🤮53❤‍🔥3

Signed 帝客服 明

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @MDMHZS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Aug 2026, 10:25 UTCAnonymous Poll1,480 voters approx.

准备想开发另外一个端口 投票决定吧

  1. PUBG端口43%
  2. iOS端口8%
  3. 无畏契约端20%
  4. 三角洲解密端30%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Aug 2026, 12:29 UTCAnonymous Poll1,680 voters approx.

前几天端口稳一点 还是今天稳一点

  1. 前几天稳一点45%
  2. 昨天凌晨➕今天稳一点55%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 16 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 55,698 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“明帝端口官方频道” (@MDMHZS), 46,209 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MDMHZS.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.