Channel
@MCP_News
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,180subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001259808568 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MCP_News |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MCP_News |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:36 | 1,180 | +3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 05:53 | 1,177 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 1,178 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:05 | 1,177 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 1,177 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (3 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 907 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 21:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
📰 Trump endorses Brent Taylor as crypto looks past politics A Trump endorsement hit the tape and crypto barely noticed. Bitcoin held near $64,583 while the real pressure built elsewhere. So what is actually moving this market?
📰 Crowded longs set a squeeze trap under extreme fear A long squeeze is brewing while the fear gauge screams panic. So why are traders still piling into leveraged longs right into resistance?
📰 Dormant Bitcoin moves 200 times the Coldcard theft A dormant Bitcoin movement 200 times the Coldcard theft just woke up, yet barely any coins reached exchanges. So is this quiet supply bullish, or a trap?
📰 Iran and Oman float toll-free Strait of Hormuz reopening A Strait of Hormuz reopening proposal from Iran and Oman should be risk-on news. Yet Bitcoin barely twitched. So what is the market really pricing here?
📰 USD.AI Fuels GPU Lending Growth Amidst Aave Onboarding USD.AI recently revealed its July recap, highlighting $81 million in GPU-backed loans and Aave governance progress. Does this specialized growth signal a broader shift for the crypto market?
📰 Strategy sells Bitcoin to fund dividends as STRC jumps 30% Strategy just sold Bitcoin to fund dividends while its shares surged 30%. When the market's loudest Bitcoin bull starts selling, who exactly is buying it from them?
📰 US, Iran and Oman near a 60-day Strait of Hormuz deal A 60-day Strait of Hormuz agreement should calm global risk, yet Bitcoin barely moved near $64,167. So when peace headlines stop moving crypto, who is really in control here?
📰 Oil crashes and stocks hit records while Bitcoin stalls The oil crash and record stocks scream risk-on, yet Bitcoin sits frozen near $64k while equities party. So who is really being set up here?
📰 Whale swallows 89% Bored Ape loss to feed an ETH long One whale just booked an 89% loss on a Bored Ape and shovelled the cash into a leveraged ETH long. Is this deep conviction, or a premature bet before the dip?
📰 Citrea launches first trust-minimized Bitcoin bridge Citrea has shipped the first trust-minimized Bitcoin bridge on live mainnet. But does a genuine utility upgrade change what price is about to do next?
📰 GoPlus stakes 100 BTC on whether AI can crack crypto GoPlus Security just put 100 BTC on the line over whether AI can break cryptography, and Bitcoin barely blinked. So what is the silence really telling us?
📰 Regulators squeeze crypto yet self-custody stays untouched Regulators keep squeezing while a self-custody narrative says they already lost. Bitcoin holds near $63,773. But is this resilience real, or retail buying a story before the dip?
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MCP_News. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 747,999 of 1,602,868entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MCP📰News FREE” (@MCP_News), 1,180 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MCP_News.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.