Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
66 measurements spanning 98 days, net -576. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,743–15,497 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 66
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Nov 2026, 02:01
14,830
-13
10 Nov 2026, 00:49
14,843
-13
8 Nov 2026, 14:08
14,856
-8
7 Nov 2026, 08:49
14,864
-12
6 Nov 2026, 11:47
14,876
-14
5 Nov 2026, 12:37
14,890
-1
4 Nov 2026, 15:37
14,891
-6
3 Nov 2026, 17:01
14,897
+1
2 Nov 2026, 20:31
14,896
-6
1 Nov 2026, 16:57
14,902
-1
31 Oct 2026, 18:27
14,903
-10
30 Oct 2026, 17:30
14,913
-8
29 Oct 2026, 20:08
14,921
-7
28 Oct 2026, 17:19
14,928
-18
27 Oct 2026, 18:58
14,946
-10
26 Oct 2026, 18:07
14,956
-6
25 Oct 2026, 20:49
14,962
-2
23 Oct 2026, 22:20
14,964
-6
22 Oct 2026, 19:50
14,970
-15
21 Oct 2026, 16:36
14,985
first reading
Engagement
215 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 88 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.85%
avg views ÷ 14,830 subscribers
Avg views / post
867
56 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
56
of 215 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held
215 (2 August 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total
48,557
Reactions total
719
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Nov 2026, 20:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,150
Videos
≈377
Links
≈1,400
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
3,588 reactions across 209 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,263
35.2%
🤝
772
21.5%
🔥
616
17.2%
💘
595
16.6%
😭
342
9.53%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 209 of the 215 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,588 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 215 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 56 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
نمیخوام آدم چص ناله ای باشم ولی وقتی بعد از ساعت ها گوش دادن به حرفات یه بار حالم بده میام غر میزنم یه دفعه راهبه کلیسا نشو و نگو تو چقدر قدرنشناسیو زندگیت خوبه! فقط گوش بده
بابت احساساتم بهم عذاب وجدان نده
کاش اینجا بودی و میخوندی...
💌 از طرف یه #INFP
📮 • #YourWords
☕️ • @MBTICafe
درود
راستش احساس خیلی بدی دارم
خیلی غیر اجتماعی هستم ولی واقعا دارم تلاش میکنم با آدما ارتباط بگیرم
با کلی احساس خوب به آدما نزدیک میشم و سعی میکنم باهاشون دوست بشم
ولی هر دفعه بدتر از دفعه ی قبل میخوره توی ذوقم
پیام میدم به زور جواب میدن و انگار هیچ اشتیاقی برای ادامه ی گفت و گو ندارن همش من باید اول پیام بدم همش من باید موضوع پیدا کنم همش من باید تلاش کنم
و این موضوع داره روانیم میکنه چون سراغ هر آدمی میرم این کار…
درود. یک سری پرسش دارم از کسانی که رشتهشون ریاضیه؛ ممکنه نظرات و تجربیاتتون رو به اشتراک بذارید؟ هدفتون از انتخاب این رشته چی بوده؟ اگر راضی هستید به چه علته و اگر ناراضی هستید به چه علت؟
امسال نهمم و مطمئن نیستم برم سمت رشتهی ریاضی فیزیک یا کامپیوتر...
💌 از طرف یه #INTJ
📮 • #YourWords
☕️ • @MBTICafe
راستش من توی ارتباطات مشکل داشتم و نمیتونستم با کسی ارتباط بگیرم
هیچ دوستی هم نداشتم
و چند وقتیه سعی میکنم ارتباط بگیرم
بیرون از خونه جایی نیست که بتونم دوست پیدا کنم
بنابراین حداقل آنلاین سعی میکنم به بقیه پیام بدم و یه رابطه دوستی شروع کنم به بهانه های مختلف
مثلا به مدت بهش توجه میکنم که ببینم علایق مشترکی داریم یا نه و به اون بهانه به یکی پیام دادم
یا به چند نفر دیگه هم پیام دادم
ولی حس میکنم که فقط من دارم سعی م…
من و دوست intp ام به مدتیه که از هم خیلی فاصله گرفتیم و نمیدونم چطوری شرایط بهتر کنم و با خودم میگم شاید دلش نمیخواد و یه جورایی مجبور بشه ولی خیلی دلم براش تنگ شده
دوستان intp نظرتون چیه؟
💌 از طرف یه #INFP
📮 • #YourWords
☕️ • @MBTICafe
وقتی یه حرفی برام میزنی، خواهشاً رفرنس هم کنارش برام بده
مهم نیست اگر رفرنست یه ویدیوی مسخره باشه
مهم اینه که من مطمئن میشم خودت هنوز کامل اسکل نشدی.
💌 از طرف یه #INTJ
📮 • #YourWords
☕️ • @MBTICafe
ام نمیدونم از کجا بگم یا چطور بگم
از پس از جدایی والدینم، ارتباطم با سمت پدری خیلی کم و تقریبا قطع شد، و خب مداوم حس میکنم بخشی از اونها نیستم و خودمو پیششون ضایع میکنم و اضافم و...
خب اونا کم پیش میاد تلاشی برای ارتباط باهام انجام بدن یا قدمی بردارن. هروقت بیان به شهر اجدادیمون ( جایی که هستم ) خبر هم نمیدن به من یا پیشم نمیان تنها بعضی وقتا خیلی کم پیش میاد بیان پیش من و اونم از یه صبح تا شب منو ده تا خونه فامیل دو…
سلاممم ، خوبین ؟
بچه ها خیلی نیاز دارم به یه آدمی که کنارم باشه میدونین دوست دارم کسی باشه که عاشقش باشم و عاشقم باشه نه صرفا یه دوست ... چون تا حالا تجربه اش نکردم هیچوقت با کسی نبودم در حالی که معیار هام واقعا زیاد نیست و خیلی آدم ساده پسندیم بیشتر از قیافه اخلاق و رفتار اجتماعی اون آدم و توجه اش به چیزهای کوچک برام مهمه اگر ISTJ باشه چه بهتر
چون دایره اجتماعی من خیلی بزرگه دوست های زیادی دارم مخصوصا که خوابگاهی ه…
خب واقعا از بودن تو اجتماع خوشم میاد و پشت کنکور موندم وتصمیم گرفتم برم کتابخونه vip چون نمیتونم تو خونه بخونم ولی خب از دوران مدرسه خاطرات بدی از بودن تو اجتماع داشتم چندین سال تو مدرسه یه سری آدم ازم بدشون میاد و مشغول آزار دادن و مسخره کردن و بولی کردنم میشدن و خب الان که تو کتابخونه ام دو سه نفر اینطورن باهام
نمیدونم مشکل چیه قرار نیست همه ازم خوششون بیاد اوکی ولی خب اگه ازم بدشون میاد لازم نیست بشینن کنارم و باه…
وقتی یه ایدهی بزرگ میاد توی ذهنم همه بهم این دوتا حرف رو میزنن
«برای تصمیم گیری خیلی زوده»
«نظرت ممکنه تغییر کنه»
ولی تقریبا هروقت برای تصمیم گیری زود بوده،هیچوقت کسی بهم هشدار نداده بود دربارهش.و حتی این درمورد تغییر کردن نظر هم صدق میکنه.
یادتون نره که معمولا آدما از ترس اینکه این علاقه و ایدهتون عمیق و غیرسطحی باشه این حرفا رو میزنن که دست از تلاش برداری:)
💌از طرف یه #INFJ
📮 • #YourWords
☕️ • @MBTICafe
💘7👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 215 posts we hold for @MBTICafe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 15 posts on @MBTICafe as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
7 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
36 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
3
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@MBTICafe named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@khayatie named in 2 posts, 16 August 2026 – 18 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
「INTP . ENTP」 @XntpType · 19,443 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 28 September 2026
𝐌𝐞𝐨𝐰 𝐌𝐁𝐓𝐈 ִֶָ ☁️ @meowmbti · 46,728 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 27 August 2026
MBTI Universe. @mbtiuniverse · 49,263 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 24 August 2026
⊰ Good Reads⛄ کتاب @CityOfBooks · 70,290 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐌𝐁𝐓𝐈 𝐂𝐚𝐟𝐞 ִֶָ ☕” (@MBTICafe), 14,830 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MBTICafe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.