https://x.com/i/status/2083448139911254397 500followers raffle on X! Don't miss the chance if you have an account on X!
❤4🎉2

Channel
@MAVRICKART
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
685subscribers
+27 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001684172214 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MAVRICKART |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MAVRICKART |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 10:48 | 685 | +9 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 10:58 | 676 | +10 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:13 | 666 | +8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:12 | 658 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 658 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 25 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (25 April 2026 – 1 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,205 |
| Reactions total | 70 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 05:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
789 reactions across 17 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 467 | 59.2% | |
| 🥰 | 64 | 8.11% | |
| 🔥 | 61 | 7.73% | |
| 😍 | 44 | 5.58% | |
| 🤬 | 39 | 4.94% | |
| ❤🔥 | 33 | 4.18% | |
| 😢 | 25 | 3.17% | |
| 💋 | 11 | 1.39% | |
| 🎉 | 9 | 1.14% | |
| 🤩 | 9 | 1.14% | |
| 🥴 | 9 | 1.14% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 0.887% | |
| 🌭 | 4 | 0.507% | |
| 🍌 | 2 | 0.253% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.253% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.127% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 0.127% | |
| 🤨 | 1 | 0.127% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 789reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 25 April 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://x.com/i/status/2083448139911254397 500followers raffle on X! Don't miss the chance if you have an account on X!
❤4🎉2
Kiwibank sheep. Shaved for you!
❤40💋11🥰5🔥4😍3❤🔥1
Mavrick is pawing! pinned «Henlo! 🐾 It’s been over a month since I posted my last artwork. The reason is that the most recent commission I completed was a private one. I really wish I could show it to you all because I'm very happy with how it turned out! ^^ That said, I've still been…»
Here’s the reward for the winner of my 200 followers celebration raffle on X, Zetahyena! Thank you everyone for participating! I’ll be hosting another raffle when I hit 500 followers. Follow me on X!
❤40❤🔥16🥰9🔥4😍3
Henlo! 🐾 It’s been over a month since I posted my last artwork. The reason is that the most recent commission I completed was a private one. I really wish I could show it to you all because I'm very happy with how it turned out! ^^ That said, I've still been drawing and working on commissions as usual, just a little behind the scenes. I'll do my best to share some new art as soon as possible for everyone who's been…
❤24👍6🥰4🔥3👏1
I've been banned from Twitter again for an unfair reason. They insisted I had sexual contents on my profile picture or header image, but it's not true at all. Not only that, I've also labeled all my NSFW works as sexual contents to respect the platform rules and to protect minors on the platform. Yet, the appeal I submitted has been rejected under the same unfair reasoning...
🤬39❤8🤗1🤩1
Commission done for Mika the Shep! 🐾 It was really fun to draw this cute couple. ^^ I hope I did their relationship justice!
❤61🔥23🥰6🌭4🍌2🥴2👏1🤨1
Commission done for Jirikdos! 🐾 I'm very satisfied with how I rendered the sheets, and I love how inviting and hot he looks. ❤️
❤63😍9🤩8🥰2
Mavrick is pawing! pinned «Someone just tried to scam me with a fake screenshot claiming they donated $3,000 to me, then insisted I had to pay some kind of "confirmation fee" to receive it. It really sucks that they got my hopes up while I'm financially struggling, only to crush them…»
Someone just tried to scam me with a fake screenshot claiming they donated $3,000 to me, then insisted I had to pay some kind of "confirmation fee" to receive it. It really sucks that they got my hopes up while I'm financially struggling, only to crush them like that. If anyone genuinely wants to support me, my PayPal is here. Any amount would mean the world to me, and I'd appreciate it from the bottom of my heart.
😢24❤3
200 Followers Raffle on X! https://x.com/Mavrickzooart/status/2053376408421060707
❤6😍1
Flat Color Comm done for Mal Thank you so much again! It was a pleasure to work with you. ^^
❤51🥰13😍5🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @MAVRICKART. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 413,103 of 1,622,561entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mavrick is pawing!” (@MAVRICKART), 685 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MAVRICKART.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.