#лайф Собирайтесь. Мы идем гулять, смотреть на уточек с черепашками и нюхать цветочки 🥰
custom 605322127226175687142🥰18🤩9💅5custom 52243170697423241474🤯2😎2

Channel
@Lunas_Club
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
223subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002081954245 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Lunas_Club |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Lunas_Club |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 223 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:18 | 227 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:28 | 227 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 19 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,212 reactions across 10 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 6053221272261756871 | 378 | 31.2% | |
| 🥰 | 254 | 21.0% | |
| 🤩 | 244 | 20.1% | |
| 💅 | 72 | 5.94% | |
| custom 5438266330107097494 | 47 | 3.88% | |
| custom 5224317069742324147 | 44 | 3.63% | |
| custom 5296304239201509885 | 41 | 3.38% | |
| custom 5296665364346727584 | 38 | 3.14% | |
| 🗿 | 24 | 1.98% | |
| 🙉 | 18 | 1.49% | |
| 😐 | 16 | 1.32% | |
| 😱 | 9 | 0.743% | |
| ⚡ | 7 | 0.578% | |
| 😎 | 7 | 0.578% | |
| 🤯 | 7 | 0.578% | |
| 👨💻 | 4 | 0.33% | |
| 👻 | 2 | 0.165% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,212reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2025 to 23 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Lunas_Club. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 May 2025 to 23 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
#лайф Собирайтесь. Мы идем гулять, смотреть на уточек с черепашками и нюхать цветочки 🥰
custom 605322127226175687142🥰18🤩9💅5custom 52243170697423241474🤯2😎2
#лайф Оставлю это здесь 🥰
🥰32custom 605322127226175687112💅10⚡3🤯3🤩2
Фэшн-подборка серийчиков из тик-тока 😎 Выбери своего бойца
🥰39custom 605322127226175687115custom 522431706974232414710😐5💅3🤩3🙉3🤯2
У счастья нет завтрашнего дня, нет у него и вчерашнего... у него есть только настоящее - и то не день, а мгновение. Тургенев «Ася» #лайф
🤩34custom 605322127226175687118custom 522431706974232414710🥰5🗿2😎2🙉2😐1
💌 Бу! Давненько меня не было, а рубрики с ответами на вопросы не было ещё больше. За это время их уже прилично накопилось, хотя я старалась отвечать по мере поступления. #ВопросОтвет Штош, отвечу на самые часто повторяющиеся, ибо в боте я их жесточайшим образом игнорила 🥺 ▪️Почему я бубубол? Было время, когда в тиктоке было популярно видео и звук из него. Собственно, по мотивам этого звука меня и нарекли "Бубубол".…
custom 605322127226175687134🥰8custom 52966653643467275847😱4custom 52243170697423241474💅2👨💻1🙉1
#лайф Модель была накормлена, поглажена и почухана за ушком 😎
🥰105custom 605322127226175687149custom 543826633010709749427custom 529630423920150988511👨💻3😎3custom 52243170697423241473🙉2
От сердца и почек дарю вам листочек 😎
custom 605322127226175687187custom 529666536434672758426custom 529630423920150988521custom 52243170697423241475🥰2🙉2👻1
👺 Справка о подлинности агента Ириса Данным сообщением я, Iris | Чат-менеджер, подтверждаю, что на дату 17.08.2025 Luna pled является умничкой, солнышком и просто агентом во Вселенной «Iris | Чат-менеджер».
🤩126custom 605322127226175687177🥰33😐9custom 52243170697423241477🗿5⚡4💅4
🎶 Мир не полон любви к нам, братья Но полон чужого отчаянья #музыка
💅47custom 605322127226175687116🗿13custom 52963042392015098857custom 52966653643467275845🥰3🙉2custom 52243170697423241471
Photo, posted without a caption
🤩69custom 605322127226175687128custom 543826633010709749419🥰9🗿3🙉3custom 52963042392015098852
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @Lunas_Club. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐋𝐮𝐧𝐚 𝐂𝐥𝐮𝐛” (@Lunas_Club), 223 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Lunas_Club.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.