Channel
@LowBankTechnologies
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
91subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002308635522 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LowBankTechnologies |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LowBankTechnologies |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Oct 2026, 01:58 | 91 | -1 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 10:22 | 92 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:07 | 93 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 96 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:47 | 97 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:57 | 97 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
72 reactions across 14 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 30 | 41.7% | |
| 👍 | 16 | 22.2% | |
| 🤣 | 8 | 11.1% | |
| 💊 | 4 | 5.56% | |
| 🕊 | 4 | 5.56% | |
| 🌚 | 3 | 4.17% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 4.17% | |
| 🤮 | 2 | 2.78% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 1.39% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 1.39% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 72 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 October 2025 to 20 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ребята рад сообщить очень важную новость ,мы целый месяц с командой делали чудо ,казалось бы из простого продукта на первый взгляд мы сделали что то более чем просто услугу ,мы сделали нереально крутой сервис со своей историей, было вложено так много сил и души, я и подумать не мог что это будет PWA решение как у альфа банка (это приложение в браузере для понимания ) но мы это сделали ,буду очень рад фидбеку !! А вот…
👍2👀1
а представьте я скоро стану популярным ирл инфлюенсером и вы будете потом говорить , я был у его истоков, крипта это окно возможностей
❤2🤣1
Если вы обнулились и потеряли деньги в крипте, не повод расстраиваться, всегда есть много рабочих мест в яндекс лавке и озоне ищем свои плюсы ))
❤3
Вообщем гайз решил с вами поделиться такой информацией, я понял для себя что крипта стала убивать моё здоровье и как факт каждый день мониторить рынок стало унылым занятием Сейчас я сконцентрировался на своём здоровье и на IRL полноценно , уже начал делать крутые результаты и моя голова перестала постоянно болеть, появилась мотивация, меньше стал просиживать жопо часы за компом и жизнь стала намного ярче Что касается…
❤3😁2
а чё тут вообще есть живые? ну в плане после просадки там в порядке? Или уже присматриваете ближайший завод или ресёрчим хедхантер?
❤9
ладно немного наебал, купил себе масок штук 10, Маски всё таки крутые
😁1
я скипну этот сейл подарков, чёт не зашли, слишком много подарков, походу Дуров себе на кокун собирает
👍3
вышли подарки новые, чёт пока хз
❤3
Решил откупить у китайцев немного скинчиков на паник сейле, в целом потратил +-600 usdt
Лол что DCA возвращаются или мне показалось ?
🌚3
а чё с MET сломався?объёмы по 70-100к в минуту
я не смог пройти мимо и решил вчера купить на маленький сайз MET под фарм, покупал примерно по 5.3-5.4, если пойдёт ниже буду докупать по 0.3 по 0.1+- ,TVL показывает по фарму fees 9.75%/день выглядит довольно рисковой историей, да я люблю этот проект от UI до концепции, но бездумно быть беливером тоже не хочу, все ГМ
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @LowBankTechnologies. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Low Bank Technologies” (@LowBankTechnologies), 91 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LowBankTechnologies.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.