Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Loveeeeiis

Channel

Loveeeeiis

@LoveeeeissV

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,117subscribers

-133 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001763139836
TypeChannel
Username@LoveeeeissV
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/LoveeeeissV

Growth

5,1115,2505,180.57 August 2026 — 5,250 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,250 subscribers11 August 2026 — 5,222 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5,209 subscribers17 August 2026 — 5,183 subscribers20 August 2026 — 5,164 subscribers24 August 2026 — 5,135 subscribers26 August 2026 — 5,111 subscribers29 August 2026 — 5,237 subscribers1 September 2026 — 5,194 subscribers5 September 2026 — 5,171 subscribers10 September 2026 — 5,117 subscribers5,1177 August 202610 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 33 days, net -133. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,090–5,271 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 00:565,117-54
5 Sept 2026, 00:415,171-23
1 Sept 2026, 08:155,194-43
29 Aug 2026, 09:075,237+126
26 Aug 2026, 17:145,111-24
24 Aug 2026, 00:495,135-29
20 Aug 2026, 08:115,164-19
17 Aug 2026, 16:395,183-26
14 Aug 2026, 06:375,209-13
11 Aug 2026, 04:225,222-28
7 Aug 2026, 17:015,250no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:575,250first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

44 reactions across 8 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥44100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 04:56 UTC790 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026

быть девушкой это пытаться отвлечь себя от неприятной информации,которую сама же насталкерила

❤‍🔥19

9 Aug 2026, 07:50 UTC943 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥9

8 Aug 2026, 18:33 UTC≈1,020 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

«и среди всего хаоса твои глаза были моим покоем»

❤‍🔥5

7 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC≈1,350 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥2

7 Aug 2026, 05:01 UTC≈1,230 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

пропаганда, на которую я не поведусь: экономить деньги

❤‍🔥2

6 Aug 2026, 19:09 UTC≈1,310 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥2

6 Aug 2026, 17:14 UTC≈1,410 viewsread 12 August 2026

ما كُتِبَ لكَ سيأتيكَ ولو بعد حينٍ. то что тебе предназначено, придет к тебе, даже спустя время.

5 Aug 2026, 13:10 UTC≈1,500 viewsread 12 August 2026

по-настоящему сильные люди не объясняют почему они хотят уважения к себе. они просто не общаются с теми, кто не относится к ним с должным уважением.

4 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC≈1,640 viewsread 12 August 2026

моя скорость ответа на сообщения зависит от того, насколько мне важен человек

3 Aug 2026, 17:43 UTC≈1,870 viewsread 12 August 2026

она 10/10, но ей надо слышать как ты её любишь минимум тысячу раз в день

3 Aug 2026, 10:25 UTC≈2,070 viewsread 12 August 2026

иногда я хочу отдохнуть от себя, от своих постоянных мыслей, сомнений, страхов, переживаний, воспоминаний, хочу выйти из своей головы

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @LoveeeeissV. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Loveeeeiis” (@LoveeeeissV), 5,117 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LoveeeeissV.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.