Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
Love Liebe Pyar Prem
@Love_Liebe_Pyar_Prem
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001262932901 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Love_Liebe_Pyar_Prem |
| Description | Love is God Love is Devine Love is kind Love is given freely Love heals Love is not something we do or send or shower in someone Love just is and we are witnesses to this highest Force It is up to us to surrender to Love = God and to enjoy the experience |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 26 April 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Love_Liebe_Pyar_Prem |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:31 | 1 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:28 | 1 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 26 April 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 October 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 74
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 9
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
To love those that seem to you to be unlovable is strangely enough an even greater gift, for when you are able to find in yourself that resonance of love that can reach out to that which does not solicit it, but rather seems on the contrary to reject it, you have inched, however slightly, towards a wholeness of your whole being, towards a realization of your own being as unified, and every such experience of loving t…
Join ➠ @DivineUnion 🤍
Join ➠ @DivineUnion 🤍
Join ➠ @DivineUnion 🤍
Join ➠ @DivineUnion 🤍
Join ➠ @DivineUnion 🤍
Join ➠ @DivineUnion 🤍
Join ➠ @DivineUnion 🤍
Join ➠ @DivineUnion 🤍
Join ➠ @DivineUnion 🤍
"Beginnen wir, das Gesetz des Einen (Law Of One) zu leben, indem wir unsere Kraft nutzen, um zu vergeben, neu anzufangen, das Bedürfnis loszulassen, zu urteilen, die Fehler zu durchbrechen und Korrekturen zu erzwingen. Wenn du anfängst, dir selbst zu vergeben, gewinnst du die Kraft, die mit Barmherzigkeit einhergeht. Wenn du beginnst, dich als ganze Person zu sehen, die zwar Fehler gemacht hat, die aber immer viel …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Love_Liebe_Pyar_Prem. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Love_Liebe_Pyar_Prem named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 14 posts, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Love Liebe Pyar Prem” (@Love_Liebe_Pyar_Prem), 1 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Love_Liebe_Pyar_Prem.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.