Channel
@Love_1life
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
40,185subscribers
-775 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001000309373 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Love_1life |
| Description | 💚 عاقلانه انتخاب کن، عاشقانه زندگی کن ♥️ 🧠 عقل میگوید... ❤️ دل میخواهد... ⚖️ تو باید انتخاب کنی. گاهی یک جمله، میتونه نگاهت به یک رابطه رو تغییر بده. 🧠❤️ 📞 ارتباط با ما: @Mind_1love 🎓 دورههای آموزشی: https://t.me/Love_1life/135766 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Love_1life |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Sept 2026, 02:02 | 40,185 | -161 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 01:37 | 40,346 | -31 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 19:57 | 40,377 | -13 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 06:14 | 40,390 | -31 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:16 | 40,421 | -31 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 09:59 | 40,452 | -45 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 04:19 | 40,497 | -51 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 12:20 | 40,548 | -36 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:17 | 40,584 | -2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:27 | 40,586 | -26 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 40,612 | -16 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 40,628 | -22 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:25 | 40,650 | -5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:47 | 40,655 | -6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 40,661 | -11 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:12 | 40,672 | -28 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:13 | 40,700 | -16 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:01 | 40,716 | -20 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 40,736 | -15 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 17:57 | 40,751 | first reading |
107 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 107 (15 July 2026 – 2 October 2026) |
| Views total | 163,157 |
| Reactions total | 1,006 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Oct 2026, 13:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 50 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,963 reactions across 107 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1,394 | 71.0% | |
| 😍 | 401 | 20.4% | |
| 😢 | 85 | 4.33% | |
| 🤣 | 37 | 1.88% | |
| 🤔 | 14 | 0.713% | |
| 🤬 | 12 | 0.611% | |
| 😱 | 11 | 0.56% | |
| 🤪 | 9 | 0.458% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 107 of the 107 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,963 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 107 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 2 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#تجربه #اعتراف #داستان #ایده پنج دقیقه برای تو وقتی رسید خانه، از چهرهاش فهمیدم روز سختی داشته. گفتم: «بیا.» گفت: «کجا؟» «اینجا.» کنارم نشست. گوشیاش را کنار گذاشت. گفتم: «پنج دقیقه هیچ کاری نداریم. فقط تو حرف بزن.» اول خندید. بعد شروع کرد. از کار، آدمها، خستگی و چیزهایی گفت که تمام روز توی دلش نگه داشته بود. من فقط گوش دادم. گاهی دستش را فشار دادم. وقتی تمام شد، نفس عمیقی کشید. «خیلی بهتر شدم.» گفتم: «پس هنوز یه…
😍3
🕊 گاهی عشق، فقط دوستت داشتن نیست؛ این است که کنار یک نفر، مجبور نباشی وانمود کنی قویای. آدم امن کسیه که پیشش میتونی فقط خودت باشی. #رابطه #عشق #ازدواج #صمیمیت #داستان ♥️👉 @Love_1Life 🍂
👍4😍3
#تجربه #اعتراف #داستان #ایده یک شب از همسرم پرسیدم: «اگه قرار باشه فقط یک چیز از زندگیمون رو عوض کنیم، چی رو عوض میکنی؟» فکر کرد. گفت: «اینکه وقتی ناراحتیم، همون لحظه تصمیمهای بزرگ نگیریم.» گفتم: «مثل چی؟» گفت: «مثل طلاق، رفتن از خونه، گفتن اینکه دیگه دوستت ندارم... اینا رو بذاریم برای وقتی که آرومیم.» چند ثانیه سکوت کردم. گفتم: «قبوله.» از اون شب، یه قانون کوچیک گذاشتیم. هر وقت دعوامون خیلی بالا میگرفت، تصمیمه…
👍13
🕊 بعضی تصمیمها رو نباید وقتی عصبانیای گرفت؛ چون ممکنه چند دقیقه خشم، برای چند سال زندگی تصمیم بگیره. گاهی بالغترین جمله وسط دعوا فقط اینه: «الان نه؛ وقتی آروم شدیم.» #رابطه #ازدواج #عصبانیت #جدایی #تصمیم ♥️👉 @Love_1Life 🍂
👍9
#تجربه #اعتراف #داستان #ایده یک شب داشتم ظرف میشستم که همسرم از پشت سر گفت: «امروز خیلی خستهای؟» گفتم: «آره.» گفت: «پس ظرفها با من.» گفتم: «نه، خودم انجام میدم.» گفت: «چرا؟» گفتم: «چون عادت دارم همهچی رو خودم انجام بدم.» گفت: «من کمک خواستن رو دوست دارم. حس نمیکنم داری ازم سوءاستفاده میکنی.» همون جمله باعث شد شیر آب رو ببندم. گفتم: «باشه. پس امشب ظرفها با تو.» گفت: «بالاخره!» خندیدم. بعدها فهمیدم، گاهی آدم ا…
👍12
🕊 گاهی مستقل بودن، اگر بیش از حد بشه، حتی فرصتِ دوست داشته شدن رو هم ازت میگیره. لازم نیست همیشه قوی باشی؛ بعضی وقتها «کمکم کن» هم یک شکل از صمیمیته. #رابطه #ازدواج #صمیمیت #همدلی #عشق ♥️👉 @Love_1Life 🍂
👍12
#تجربه #اعتراف #داستان #ایده همسرم یک پیشنهاد کاری داشت که میترسید قبولش کنه. من هم میترسیدم. ولی به جای اینکه بگم: «نگیر. ریسکش زیاده.» پرسیدم: «اگه قبولش کنی، بدترین حالت چیه؟» گفت. بعد پرسیدم: «بهترین حالت؟» گفت. بعد نشستیم، وسطِ این دوتا، یه برنامه واقعی نوشتیم. در نهایت قبولش کرد. چند ماه اول سخت گذشت. یک شب گفت: «میدونی چی باعث شد قبول کنم؟» گفتم: «چی؟» گفت: «اینکه تو به جای تصمیم گرفتن برام، کمک کردی خودم …
👍13
🕊 گاهی حمایت یعنی به جای اینکه بگی «من میدونم چی به صلاحته»، کمک کنی خودش بفهمه. عشق جایی قشنگتر میشه که کنار هم باشیم، بدون اینکه جای هم تصمیم بگیریم. #رابطه #ازدواج #حمایت #اعتماد #عشق ♥️👉 @Love_1Life 🍂
👍6
#تجربه #اعتراف #داستان #ایده «من فکر کنم دیگه خیلی وقته خودم نیستم.» این رو جلوی آینه گفتم. همسرم از پشت سر پرسید: «چی شده؟» گفتم: «هیچی... فقط همه کارام شده خونه، کار، بچه، خرید، غذا.» گفت: «پس فردا مرخصی بگیر.» گفتم: «از چی؟» گفت: «از همهچی.» همون روز برای اولین بار، بچه رو برد پارک و گفت: «تو برو هر کاری دلت میخواد بکن.» رفتم کافه. تنها. یک ساعت نشستم و هیچ کاری نکردم. وقتی برگشتم، حس عجیبی داشتم. نه اینکه مشکل…
👍14
🕊 گاهی برای نجاتِ «ما»، باید اول کمی به «خودت» برگردی. وقتی تمام هویتت میشه همسر، والد و مسئولِ زندگی، ممکنه یک روز جلوی آینه ببینی خودت رو گم کردی. #رابطه #ازدواج #خودمراقبتی #زندگی #استقلال ♥️👉 @Love_1Life 🍂
👍7
#تجربه #اعتراف #داستان #ایده من از دیر اومدنِ همسرم متنفر بودم. هر بار پنج دقیقه دیرتر میرسید، پشت سر هم پیام میدادم. یک شب تصمیم گرفتم فقط یه پیام بفرستم: «وقتی رسیدی یه خبر بده. شام منتظرته.» تمام. ساعت بعد برگشت. گفت: «امروز خیلی دیر کردم. ببخشید.» گفتم: «فقط نگران شده بودم.» گفت: «میدونم. ولی وقتی ده تا پیام میاد، بیشتر از نگرانی حس میکنم دارم بازجویی میشم.» اولش ناراحت شدم. ولی راست میگفت. از اون به بعد، …
👍12
🕊 گاهی نگرانی وقتی زیاد میشه، شبیه کنترل کردن به نظر میرسه. محبت یعنی بگی «نگرانتم»؛ نه اینکه طرف مقابلت رو با پیامهای پشتسرهم زیر نظر بگیری. #رابطه #ازدواج #اعتماد #کنترل #محبت ♥️👉 @Love_1Life 🍂
👍8
Showing the 12 most recent of 107 posts we hold for @Love_1life. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“پیوند عقل و عشق” (@Love_1life), 40,185 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Love_1life.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.