Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Текст.деньги

Channel

Текст.деньги

@Lotsd

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

20,906subscribers

+17,272 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001858299007
TypeChannel
Username@Lotsd
Descriptionзаходите в «текст.деньги» — здесь кипит сеть 🔥 деньги, находки, странные истории, технологии и просто дичь, которую хочется открыть, досмотреть и переслать. высокотехнологичная выжимка Пирата 🏴‍☠️ иногда — розыгрыши 🍿
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Lotsd

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

3,22630,33016,7787 August 2026 — 3,634 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,634 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,581 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,522 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,465 subscribers20 August 2026 — 3,413 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,369 subscribers26 August 2026 — 3,341 subscribers29 August 2026 — 3,331 subscribers1 September 2026 — 3,316 subscribers5 September 2026 — 3,322 subscribers10 September 2026 — 3,298 subscribers14 September 2026 — 3,304 subscribers18 September 2026 — 3,303 subscribers28 September 2026 — 3,301 subscribers5 October 2026 — 3,247 subscribers12 October 2026 — 3,226 subscribers15 October 2026 — 3,243 subscribers19 October 2026 — 3,344 subscribers22 October 2026 — 3,456 subscribers25 October 2026 — 11,431 subscribers26 October 2026 — 30,245 subscribers27 October 2026 — 30,330 subscribers28 October 2026 — 30,262 subscribers29 October 2026 — 30,238 subscribers30 October 2026 — 28,314 subscribers31 October 2026 — 28,065 subscribers1 November 2026 — 28,058 subscribers2 November 2026 — 28,033 subscribers3 November 2026 — 27,589 subscribers4 November 2026 — 20,906 subscribers20,9067 August 20264 November 2026
31 measurements spanning 89 days, net +17,272. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 08:5020,906-6,683
3 Nov 2026, 11:5427,589-444
2 Nov 2026, 11:3628,033-25
1 Nov 2026, 09:4028,058-7
31 Oct 2026, 09:5628,065-249
30 Oct 2026, 08:4528,314-1,924
29 Oct 2026, 08:1530,238-24
28 Oct 2026, 05:4930,262-68
27 Oct 2026, 08:2730,330+85
26 Oct 2026, 06:2530,245+18,814
25 Oct 2026, 03:0511,431+7,975
22 Oct 2026, 03:563,456+112
19 Oct 2026, 02:283,344+101
15 Oct 2026, 17:483,243+17
12 Oct 2026, 07:173,226-21
5 Oct 2026, 22:143,247-54
28 Sept 2026, 12:563,301-2
18 Sept 2026, 18:573,303-1
14 Sept 2026, 08:573,304+6
10 Sept 2026, 23:363,298first reading

Engagement

121 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.59%
avg views ÷ 20,906 subscribers
Avg views / post
332
98 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.65%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
98
of 121 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 97 of 98 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held121 (5 August 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total32,506
Reactions total861
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 02:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,240
Videos
≈10,600
Links
≈1,200

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 21m
Average length
43s

Measured directly from 115 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

999 reactions across 120 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 12.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁12312.3%
👏11111.1%
🤩11111.1%
🔥10910.9%
😎10710.7%
👍10110.1%
🥰999.91%
🤣949.41%
❤929.21%
🥴80.801%
😐60.601%
🤨60.601%
👎50.501%
😴40.4%
🤓40.4%
👻30.3%
🌭20.2%
👀20.2%
😭20.2%
🤔20.2%
8 further kinds80.801%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 120 of the 121 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 999 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 121 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 121 we hold a reading for · 0.8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Lotsd. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 121 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 98 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 21:02 UTC326 views9 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

🚇 подземка. у каждого своя роль. здесь нет одинаковых жителей. у каждого свой характер, свои странности и своё место. а ты кто среди них?

🥰4❤2😁2🤩1

4 Nov 2026, 18:33 UTC309 views6 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

красную или синюю? 🔴🔵 — чтобы дать точный ответ, уточните тип устройства. — бомба. — где выход? — направо. — там тупик. — вы абсолютно правы 🤣 когда же ИИ научится не только уточнять контекст, но и понимать, что происходит? пока интеллект искусственный, а здравый смысл — в отпуске.

👍1👏1🔥1🤣1🤩1😁1

4 Nov 2026, 16:19 UTC323 views6 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

однажды в тёмном переулке… 😂 — блин, точно. яйца забыла купить. сюжетный поворот, которого никто не заказывал. 🥚

👏2😎2❤1🤩1

4 Nov 2026, 14:52 UTC317 views9 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

типичный московский пешеход 😂 уровень уверенности: 100%. уровень доверия к дорожной обстановке: видимо, тоже. 🚦 в Москве даже переход дороги иногда выглядит как проверка характера.

🥰2😁2👏1🔥1🤗1🤩1😎1

4 Nov 2026, 12:20 UTC331 views7 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

😎 когда человек на отдыхе, но явно что-то не так... я знаю, что он работает с людьми. но доказательств нет. отдыхает. просто у него отпуск с клиентской базой.

👏3😁2👍1🤩1

4 Nov 2026, 10:04 UTC330 views9 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

🎧 сказал арендодателю, что ты «славянской внешности», а он попросил доказательства. кажется, собеседование на квартиру вышло на новый уровень. 😂 если что, это юмор. зато поёт красиво 🙂‍↕️ с днём народного единства! 💗

👏3👍2😁2🔥1😎1

4 Nov 2026, 08:35 UTC325 views9 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

проблемы 2018 года. сейчас бы такие проблемы… 🥲 россияне вспомнили, что их беспокоило в 2018-м. ностальгия — странная штука: иногда скучаешь даже по временам, на которые тогда жаловался.

🥰3🤩2😁2👍1😎1

4 Nov 2026, 06:43 UTC336 views9 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

мужской лайфхак: подарить жене её же вещи. 🎁 реакция жены: мужики, держите рабочий лайфхак 😂 экономика семейного бюджета вышла на новый уровень.

🔥3🤩2❤1🤨1😁1😎1

3 Nov 2026, 20:21 UTC361 views10 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

♟️ лайфхак для тех, кто хочет действительно жаркую ночь. забудьте про банальные свидания. попробуйте Авенский гамбит: одна точная ловушка, эффектная вилочка — и пульс 140 обеспечен. главное — найти достойного соперника. отправляйте любимому человеку. пусть готовится к мату. 😏

🥰2😁2❤1👍1👏1🤣1🤩1😎1

3 Nov 2026, 18:06 UTC337 views9 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

как стать воздуханкой? 💅🏻 девочки, сегодня изучаем мужские правила. говорят, инструкция существует. осталось разобраться в нюансах. 😏

😎3🔥2❤1🤣1🥰1😁1

3 Nov 2026, 16:12 UTC340 views8 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

🎧 внезапный музыкальный опрос: а что из современной музыки вам действительно нравится? не guilty pleasure, не песня, которую слушаете исключительно по приколу, а то, что сами добровольно включаете снова и снова. интересуют треки последних двух лет. «ты не бойся ночи» за безусловный хит уже засчитана 🙂‍↕️ давайте пополним плейлист друг друга.

🥰3👏2🔥2😎1

3 Nov 2026, 14:37 UTC326 views9 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

ищут мужа. и желательно сразу с моральным кодексом. 💍 россиянки начали ходить в церковь в поисках женихов-священников. аргументация неожиданно практичная: батюшки, по мнению девушек, — мужчины на любой вкус, серьёзные, верные и с принципами. ради знакомства некоторые регулярно посещают службы, ходят на исповеди и даже становятся крёстными детей друзей. обычные приложения для знакомств явно проигрывают по оригинал…

👏3🔥3😎2👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 121 posts we hold for @Lotsd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Текст.деньги” (@Lotsd), 20,906 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Lotsd.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.