🏀 دانک زیبای کوئنتین گرایمز در تمریناتش @Losangeleslakers1947
❤10🔥5🤣1

Channel
@Losangeleslakers1947
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,578subscribers
+19 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001310440007 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Losangeleslakers1947 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Losangeleslakers1947 |
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 10:19 | 1,578 | -1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 02:39 | 1,579 | -1 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 02:57 | 1,580 | +1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:27 | 1,579 | -3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 1,582 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:14 | 1,586 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:35 | 1,588 | -3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 1,591 | +30 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:47 | 1,561 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:07 | 1,559 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:32 | 1,559 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:31 | 1,558 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 1,559 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
371 reactions across 19 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 111 | 29.9% | |
| 👍 | 62 | 16.7% | |
| 🤣 | 52 | 14.0% | |
| 🔥 | 46 | 12.4% | |
| 🏆 | 20 | 5.39% | |
| 👏 | 19 | 5.12% | |
| 😐 | 17 | 4.58% | |
| 💔 | 16 | 4.31% | |
| 👎 | 13 | 3.50% | |
| 🤬 | 8 | 2.16% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 1.08% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 0.539% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 0.27% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 371 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🏀 دانک زیبای کوئنتین گرایمز در تمریناتش @Losangeleslakers1947
❤10🔥5🤣1
🖌 زایر ویلیامز درمورد اینکه پوشیدن جرزی لیکرز چه ارزشی برای او دارد گفت: «اون زایرِ ۸ ساله که بسکتبال رو شروع کرده بود الان داره از خوشحالی پشتک میزنه! واقعاً همه اتفاقات این مسیر تا رسیدن به این نقطه از جلوی چشمام رد شده. دیدن اسمم روی پیراهن لیکرز واقعاً حس عجیبی داشت؛ هیچوقت فکر نمیکردم روزی این رویا به واقعیت تبدیل بشه.» @Losangeleslakers1947
❤13
📺 هایلایت های آستین ریوز مقابل تاندر در سه بازی آخر سری 📊 عملکرد ریوز در این بازیها: ▫️ ۲۵ امتیاز | ۷ اسیست | ۴ ریباند ▫️ ٪۵۱ فیلدگل | ۳۹٪ سهامتیازی | ۸۲٪ پرتابآزاد ▫️۳۱ امتیاز با ۷۶٪ ترو شوتینگ در بازی دوم، بهترین عملکردش در کرییر پلیآف 🔸 شوت ها اکثرا بسیار سخت با حرکت انفرادی مقابل بهترین مدافعان لیگ؛ هرچند خروجی ریوز در این سری مورد انتقاد است اما با در نظر گرفتن زودتر برگشتن از مصدومیت، نبود لوکا برای کمت…
❤10🔥3
📊 واکر کسلر دو فصل متوالی است که با ثبت میانگین ۴/۶ ریباند حمله در هر بازی، برترین بازیکن لیگ از این لحاظ بوده است ➕ فصل گذشته تعداد بازی هایش به حد نصاب نرسید که به طور رسمی در بین برترینها قرار بگیرد ▫️ کسلر در باکساوت هم فصل ۲۰۲۵ در بین ۸ نفر برتر قرار داشت. @Losangeleslakers1947
❤15
یادم میاد وقتی عکس ازدواجشون رو گذاشتن، اون زمان توی دالاس بود، گفتم این بازیکنا عجب شانسی دارن چقدر کوتهنظری و در قید ظواهر دنیا بودن
🤣18👌4
🖌 گزارشها حاکی از آن است که آناماریا گولتس، نامزد سابق لوکا دانچیچ، در اسلوونی دادخواست جدیدی در رابطه با اختلاف بر سر حضانت و نفقه ثبت کرده و در مجموع ۵۰ میلیون دلار مطالبه کرده است؛ ۴۰ میلیون دلار برای خودش و ۱۰ میلیون دلار برای دو دخترشان 🔸 او همچنین خواستار کاهش زمان حضانت لوکا از ۲ روز در هفته به تنها ۱ روز شده است. 🔹 دانچیچ در حال حاضر در اسلوونی به سر میبرد و در تلاش است حضانت مشترک فرزندانش را به دست آورد…
😐14🤬8👍1
🖌 ایوان سایدری: میامی هیت و لسآنجلس لیکرز همچنان منتظرند تا کلی تامپسون قراردادش را با دالاس موریکس بایاوت کند. 🔸 این خبرنگار نچندان معتبر ادامه داد: دالاس علاقه چندانی ندارد که در مذاکرات احتمالی با هرکدام از این دو تیم، قرارداد نیکولا یوویچ یا جرد وندربیلت را بر عهده بگیرد. هر دو تیم احتمالاً به تامپسون این فرصت را پیشنهاد میدهند که بلافاصله در ترکیب استارتر آنها قرار بگیرد. @Losangeleslakers1947
👎10👍6😐3
🖌 ایوان سایدری: مینسوتا و ساکرامنتو اخیرا به جذب کامینگا علاقه نشان داده اند اما او برای ثابت کردن خودش حاضر نیست با قرارداد مینیموم به تیمی بپیوندد. لیکرز همچنان با سایناندترید بیشترین شانس را برای جذب او دارد @Losangeleslakers1947
👍13❤1
🖌 مایکل تامپسون همچنان در تلاش است تا پسرش کِلی را به لیکرز بیاورد 🗣 نمیدونم نظر دوستان چیه و بگذریم که کلی ۳۶ ساله چندان فیت خوبی برای این تیم نیست، اما این مرد دو بار فرصت واقعی داشت بیاد لیکرز، یه بار ۲۰۱۹ که قراردادش تموم شد و لیکرز کپش رو در ماجرای کوای خالی کرده بود، یه بارم دو سال پیش که حتی حقوق بیشتری بهش پیشنهاد دادن نسبت به دالاس اما بخاطر توهماتی رفت اونجا. حتی با مینیموم، نه ممنون @Losangeleslakers1947
👏19👍5👎3
📺 کالین سکستن در زمین بسکتبال؛ آماده و سرحال @Losangeleslakers1947
🔥14
📊 مهاجمان سال گذشته روی دست کوئنتین گرایمز فقط 28.6% موفقیت در اقدام های سهامتیازی داشتند ▫️ دومین بازیکن برتر لیگ از این لحاظ در فصل گذشته @Losangeleslakers1947
👍13
📊 بیشترین تعداد حضور در فینال از سال ۲۰۰۰ @Losangeleslakers1947
❤15
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Losangeleslakers1947. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LAKERS” (@Losangeleslakers1947), 1,578 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Losangeleslakers1947.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.