Gimli joined the fellowship! https://twitter.com/LordoftheInu/status/1457331712858394628

Channel
LordOfTheInu
@LordOfTheInu
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
13subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001599037973 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LordOfTheInu |
| Description | Official Announcement channel for $LOTI |
| Created | 5 November 2021 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LordOfTheInu |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:31 | 13 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:28 | 13 | first reading |
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 5 November 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 November 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 1
- Links
- 4
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
Both CoinGecko & CoinMarketCap forms filled in. Dextools trending coming aswell in about 8 hours if everything goes to plan.
CoinMarketCap & CoinGecko listing confirmed within 24-48 hours! It's great to see how much trust the community has had in us so far.
For on going giveaways and contests check out our Twitter! https://twitter.com/LordoftheInu
Quick overview what is yet to come: -More callers -Certik audit -CoinGecko & CoinMarketCap -NFT Preview -Extended liquidity lock for 6 MONTHS on 10 Million MCAP
The is our new discussion group: @LOTI_Token
We are working on a new discussion group, our first one got botted, this time there will be captcha.
https://etherscan.io/tx/0xc49da0f0047abf098c33bec39a784fc3a3cb7aa4bf4b69a3e661715501403170
Liquidity is getting locked.
This is our only official Telegram channel, someone else botted the main group.
🧙Lord of the Inu is Live!🧙 We just stealth launched on Uniswap ⚔️Tokenomics⚔️ ETH Token Total Supply: 1,000,000,000,000 50% Burn 1% Liquidity 4% Marketing 2% Development 3% Manual Buy Backs Lord of the Rings is one of the most known series of all time, the series has a huge fanbase and community behind it. NFT’s are non-fungible tokens. An NFT represent an unique digital item which is not interchangeable. With th…
Channel photo updated
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @LordOfTheInu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,399,126 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@LordOfTheInu named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LordOfTheInu” (@LordOfTheInu), 13 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LordOfTheInu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.