Logan Call (100x Gems) pinned a photo

Channel
Logan Call (100x Gems)
@LoganCall
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,528subscribers
-56 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001595715229 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LoganCall |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LoganCall |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:38 | 1,528 | -54 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:55 | 1,582 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:46 | 1,584 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 1 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 11s
- Average length
- 11s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,040 reactions across 10 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 153 | 14.7% | |
| 💯 | 126 | 12.1% | |
| 🐳 | 114 | 11.0% | |
| 🏆 | 102 | 9.81% | |
| ❤ | 92 | 8.85% | |
| 👌 | 73 | 7.02% | |
| ⚡ | 59 | 5.67% | |
| 🥰 | 58 | 5.58% | |
| 🎉 | 56 | 5.38% | |
| 👍 | 42 | 4.04% | |
| 🤩 | 32 | 3.08% | |
| 💋 | 28 | 2.69% | |
| 🕊 | 28 | 2.69% | |
| 🍾 | 21 | 2.02% | |
| 👏 | 13 | 1.25% | |
| 😍 | 13 | 1.25% | |
| 🍓 | 8 | 0.769% | |
| 👻 | 8 | 0.769% | |
| 👀 | 7 | 0.673% | |
| 😎 | 7 | 0.673% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,040reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2025 to 17 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
RWA ( Real World Assets ) 🎨 I’d like to introduce you to a new project in the RWA (Real World Assets) sector that’s definitely worth your attention. ↗️ RWA Inc. is building infrastructure to tokenize real-world assets such as real estate, equity, and other financial instruments, making them accessible on-chain. The platform combines tokenization, a launchpad, and a marketplace, allowing users to invest in tradition…
💯34🔥26👏13👀4
Solana Bags — $BAG Secure the bag. Literally. A real fashion brand built on Solana not just a token. We design, produce, and ship physical bags, fully built in public. Team holds 10%+ supply long-term. 100% of Pump.fun fees go to marketing + real production. Follow the build. Watch it become real. 🪙CA: 7k74YrjdUY6EaATMUXQ57HjUURm8V9SFYksfa6prpump ✉️ t.me/SolanaBagsTG ❌ x.com/SolBagsX 🌐 solana-bags.com
💯24🏆20🍾9🐳9👌9⚡8💋8🍓7
Logan Call (100x Gems) pinned a photo
PriceGoingUp $PGU PriceGoingUp meme on pumpfun The self-fulfilling memecoin prophecy! Recent launch. In dip area. Lowcap play. Good branding and ticker. Contract: 2RedZhnmaGzsmmHmj1WdpMW4sMnLhXdBvFj1WbBXpump 📱 https://t.me/PGUPORTAL 📱 https://x.com/pricegoingupsol
👌25🔥18🏆16🐳16💯12🍾9🎉8🤩7
Logan Call (100x Gems) pinned a photo
IBC6900 - $IBC The Venezuelan Stock Exchange is up 100% since the U.S captured their president. $IBC is the Venezuelan stock market advanced blockchain cryptography token coin Our goal is to flip IBC. The current IBC index is at 3896. CA:1272UQeeN7s5xU3uaatwzpW1aTPzi6CwxjsN3Q1apump Telegram: t.me/IBC6900 X: http://www.x.com/IBC6900 X community: https://x.com/i/communities/2008869177235271701 Website: ibc6900.…
🏆28⚡14👌11🕊10💋8🍾3🐳3💯3
♾️ ♾️ To infinity and beyond X com: https://x.com/i/communities/2008191610840879131 TG: https://t.me/infinityonsoltg CA: Bh5YPxSW21SBdjHhojNzqxnj6m34FdevaSPZGjampump
🐳35🔥15🎉11❤9👍8
💥 USD1 เปิดตัวอย่างเป็นทางการบน AB Chain! 💎 นี่คือก้าวสำคัญในการขยายธุรกิจ USD1 ไปทั่วโลก รองรับธุรกรรมที่รวดเร็วขึ้น - เสถียรขึ้น - ไม่มีค่าธรรมเนียมแก๊สบน AB Blockchain ⚡️ 🎯 ในอนาคตอันใกล้นี้ จะมีแอปพลิเคชันและยูทิลิตี้ใหม่ๆ สำหรับ USD1 เพิ่มเติม - โปรดติดตาม! 🔥 WorldLibertyFi x AB DAO ➡️ ดูข้อมูลเพิ่มเติมได้ที่: https://x.com/worldlibertyfi/status/1988637492279464225 #ABDAO #ABประเทศไทย ———————————————— 📲 ดาว…
💯29🥰26👌21🤩16🎉15👍12❤10🔥8
Logan Call (100x Gems) pinned a photo
Zero Grind TopNod Blitz! 💥 150K U Prize Pool | Quick Rewards | Low Entry! TopNod Money Machine: Register & Win Instantly — Zero Effort, All Gain! 💰 ▰▰▰ 2-Step Fast Track 🔹 Download 👉 topnod.com 🔹 Enter Code TRS1_THVOTJHCE for an Extra Draw! 🎟️ Draw Details: 1 Voucher = 1 Draw | 0.05 – 1000 U Range | 24 h Payouts! ⏳ Only 8 Days Left — Grab Your Share Before It’s Gone! ⚡ Tip: App is Smooth & All-in-One — Zero Depos…
❤35🥰11🎉9😍9🐳8👍8💯8🔥8
Logan Call (100x Gems) pinned a photo
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @LoganCall. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 987,691 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@LoganCall named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Logan Call (100x Gems)” (@LoganCall), 1,528 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LoganCall.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.