Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Локальна історія

@LocalHistoryUA

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,981subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001498039741
TypeChannel
Username@LocalHistoryUA
Created20 December 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/LocalHistoryUA

Growth

3,9813,9863,983.56 August 2026 — 3,982 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,982 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,986 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,981 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,980–3,987 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 17:163,981-5
10 Aug 2026, 02:513,986+4
6 Aug 2026, 18:003,982no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:493,982first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.76%
avg views ÷ 3,981 subscribers
Avg views / post
388
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held17 (4 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total6,602
Reactions total89
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

89 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3842.7%
3134.8%
❤‍🔥1719.1%
💔33.37%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 89reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 11:36 UTC327 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Купуйте книгу в онлайн-крамниці видавництва: https://publishing.localhistory.org.ua/product/brydke-slovo-na-k-opovid-pro-kolaboraczionizm/

1

7 Aug 2026, 11:36 UTC312 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

“У кожному конкретному випадку саме суспільство вирішує, чи є певне явище або поведінка колаборацією”. Чи можна дати універсальне визначення колаборації? Де проходить межа між вимушеною співпрацею та зрадою? Чому одні й ті самі дії різні суспільства оцінюють по-різному? В інтерв'ю, присвяченому книзі “Бридке слово на “к”. Оповідь про колабораціонізм”, польський історик Пйотр Маєвський розглядає феномен колаборації

1

7 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC359 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Про роль культури в російсько-українському протистоянні читайте у книзі Радомира Мокрика "Культурна колонізація". Купуйте книжку в онлайн-крамниці видавництва: https://publishing.localhistory.org.ua/product/kulturna-kolonizacziya-strah-prynyzhennya-ta-opir-ukrayiny-v-radyanskij-imperiyi/

4👍1

7 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC338 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

120 років тому в селі Бурдяківці на Тернопільщині народився художник-графіст Леопольд Левицький. Упродовж усього шляху в мистецтві він працював над двома улюбленими темами — це людина і місто. Життя людини з усіма радощами та прикрощами, щоденне, буденне, без прикрас, і життя міста — великого, яскравого, з гулом машин і шумом вулиць чи маленького, провінційного, сповненого власної гідності та самоповаги галицького мі

1👍1

6 Aug 2026, 10:21 UTC435 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Фото: житель села Жари Сумської області Кривопишин Іван з яблуками із власного саду, 1955 рік. Свій сад він закладав, взоруючись на досвід Володимира Львовича Симиренка.

❤‍🔥172

6 Aug 2026, 10:21 UTC400 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

6 серпня в Україні відзначають Яблучний Спас. Одним із сортів, які традиційно несли до церкви на освячення, була путивка. Згідно з описом ученого-помолога Лева Симиренка, це яблуко має зеленувато-жовту шкірку, покриту дрібними цятками. Коли плід достигає, то з сонячного боку з'являється легкий рум'янець, а цятки стають менш помітними. «Хоч би яких чудових путивок приношено з Підварку, мати не їла їх до Спаса, либонь

👍51

6 Aug 2026, 06:04 UTC381 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

6 серпня 1914 року у Львові було створено легіон Українських січових стрільців. Саме з нього розпочалася історія першого українського добровольчого військового формування XX століття. Стрільці не лише воювали на фронтах Першої світової війни, а й заклали традицію українського війська, яка продовжується й сьогодні. ✍🏼У подвійному номері журналу “Локальна історія” ми зібрали найцікавіші історії про легіон УСС. Дізнав

👍32

5 Aug 2026, 13:11 UTC465 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Фото: Ольга Басараб, 1910-ті роки.

👍51

5 Aug 2026, 13:11 UTC393 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

«9 лютого 1924 року польська поліція арештувала і після триденних катувань убила Ольгу Басараб (дівоче прізвище Левицька), членкиню підпільної УВО. Хоча влада стверджувала, що жінка сама повісилася у камері, українці не повірили цій версії, бо знали про інші подібні «самогубства» під час допитів. У 1918–1923 роках Басараб працювала в посольствах Української Народної Республіки (УНР) у Фінляндії та Австрії, подорожую

5

5 Aug 2026, 07:42 UTC432 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Більше про злочини радянського режиму та його репресивну політику читайте у книзі Тімоті Снайдера “Криваві землі”: https://publishing.localhistory.org.ua/product/kryvavi-zemli-yevropa-mizh-gitlerom-i-stalinym/

👍51

5 Aug 2026, 07:42 UTC434 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

5 серпня згадують жертв Великого терору. Комуністична влада руками НКВС ув'язнювала, катувала, розстрілювала та відправляла до таборів ГУЛАГу всіх, кого вважала “ворогами”: селян, інтелігенцію, представників національних громад, духовенство, партійців і звичайних громадян. Лише за офіційними даними, на території України органи НКВС заарештували понад 267 тисяч осіб. Тисячі людей були засуджені за сфабрикованими звин

💔31

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @LocalHistoryUA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 346,708 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Локальна історія” (@LocalHistoryUA), 3,981 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LocalHistoryUA.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.