🧸 надеюсь, что скоро будет готов )
custom 52064210405315302892custom 52156255892385636471custom 52964589653983310741custom 53642551873744647211

Channel
@Lizahohohoho
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
55subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002001016835 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Lizahohohoho |
| Description | всем привет, я Лиза я плету 3,5 года владелец:@lizahohh канал создан: 04.09.24 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Lizahohohoho |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:15 | 55 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:48 | 55 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 21 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (21 February 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 17 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
144 reactions across 15 posts, in 35 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 7.64% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5253723662846040379 | 11 | 7.64% | |
| custom 5848223294972501064 | 11 | 7.64% | |
| custom 5463178609302736668 | 10 | 6.94% | |
| custom 5409312465211111380 | 8 | 5.56% | |
| custom 5201740698704974933 | 6 | 4.17% | |
| custom 5253764155797705082 | 6 | 4.17% | |
| custom 5296458965398331074 | 6 | 4.17% | |
| custom 5364255187374464721 | 6 | 4.17% | |
| custom 5382097843026692999 | 6 | 4.17% | |
| custom 5408836114683280780 | 6 | 4.17% | |
| custom 5463229152477879749 | 6 | 4.17% | |
| custom 5208596188063882686 | 5 | 3.47% | |
| custom 5850316782291655483 | 5 | 3.47% | |
| custom 5235904200017214505 | 4 | 2.78% | |
| custom 5364284186993644109 | 4 | 2.78% | |
| custom 5384100934169169953 | 4 | 2.78% | |
| 🍓 | 4 | 2.78% | |
| custom 5204405760271882939 | 3 | 2.08% | |
| custom 5206421040531530289 | 3 | 2.08% | |
| custom 5398101973503346813 | 3 | 2.08% | |
| 15 further kinds | 27 | 18.8% |
Custom emoji. 19 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 144reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 21 February 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Lizahohohoho. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 February 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🧸 надеюсь, что скоро будет готов )
custom 52064210405315302892custom 52156255892385636471custom 52964589653983310741custom 53642551873744647211
всем добрый вечер! продолжаю фигурку, но цвета я пока не покажу 🥺
custom 52085961880638826863custom 52064210405315302891custom 52156255892385636471custom 53147552254315952631custom 54631786093027366681custom 54632291524778797491
всем привет! что-то я очень давно ничего не выкладывала, но я медленно плету 💕 сейчас делаю фигурку, которую давно хотела сплести)
custom 52085961880638826861custom 52964589653983310741custom 53642551873744647211custom 53642841869936441091custom 54631786093027366681custom 54632291524778797491
наконец-то плету 😍
custom 52359042000172145051custom 52964589653983310741custom 53642551873744647211custom 53642841869936441091custom 54629771495667481631custom 54631786093027366681custom 54632291524778797491
всем привееет! 🤩 моя новая фигурка-Джуди Хопс из Зверополиса 🤩 🧎 плела на тест от Клубничного Зайчика 🧎 Джуди плела очень долго, но Ника быстро сделала 🧎 они получились очень красивые мне очень нравятся, а как Вам?)
custom 54631786093027366686custom 52359042000172145052custom 53642551873744647212❤1custom 52085961880638826861custom 52964589653983310741custom 53642841869936441091custom 54629771495667481631
кто тут с Ником?) 🤩
🍓4custom 52964589653983310742custom 54632291524778797492custom 52359042000172145051custom 54629771495667481631custom 54631786093027366681
с 8 марта! 🌸
custom 52537641557977050825custom 52537236628460403794custom 52539869701110873541
всем привет! мой Ник был 😉😀😌🙂🤨🥲 с @Alina_rg2010 её канал-@Ali_Beadss, подписываемся 🚔 это наша первая парная работа, надеюсь не последняя) как Вам наши лисы? 🦊
custom 58503167822916554835custom 58482232949725010644custom 58502562747923894372
Джуди Хоббс в процессе) 🤩
custom 54093124652111113805custom 53820978430266929994custom 53841009341691699532custom 54088361146832807801
начала Джуди 🤩 Элвина потом продолжу 🧸
custom 54088361146832807805custom 54093124652111113803custom 53820978430266929992custom 53841009341691699532
всех с 1 марта! 🌸 спасибо за звездочку! 🤩
custom 52537236628460403797custom 53981019735033468133custom 52537641557977050821custom 52539869701110873541
чьи глазки? ❤️
custom 53642131009899299601custom 53642551873744647211custom 53642812492360156831custom 53642841869936441091
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @Lizahohohoho. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,233,663 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🐈 𝐥𝐢𝐳𝐚𝐡𝐨𝐡_𝐛𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐬” (@Lizahohohoho), 55 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Lizahohohoho.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.