Let's print today ,
π2π₯1

Channel
@LionGems
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Polls Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry
11subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001555397206 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LionGems |
| Description | Owner @LionGemsOwn BNB - ETH - SOLONA - AVAX - MATIC Assistant : l0xJunior |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 23 January 2023β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LionGems |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:16 | 11 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:48 | 11 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 January 2023 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 February 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 12 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
68 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π₯ | 25 | 36.8% | |
| π | 24 | 35.3% | |
| β€ | 11 | 16.2% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 3 | 4.41% | |
| π€© | 2 | 2.94% | |
| π | 1 | 1.47% | |
| π | 1 | 1.47% | |
| π₯° | 1 | 1.47% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 68reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 January 2023 to 13 February 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Let's print today ,
π2π₯1
Hey , u are active?
π2π₯1
@babycaketwopointzero https://poocoin.app/tokens/0x49784533bb4f82d02262ca99ec5c8e005b2a1021 5.5 k mCap , try Your Lucky Called @LionGems
π₯7β€βπ₯2β€1π1
Ath 1.2 k mCap X2 EASYLY
π1
Launched based on king hype Trending on buy bot and low cap so may send....pure gamble rn https://poocoin.app/tokens/0xa7dba51b483226c4e9ab0c0ac08cffc6a3338d85 600 MC https://t.me/princeofbsc Nfa dyor Called @LionGems
π₯4π1
Shill Me Your Gems π¦
π2
Shironeko (ETH) π Fairlaunch on Ethereum Network 3 ETH Start MC , Caesar , Lemon , Frog Here , I will ape This. Good Luck Everyone. π Whale Friend Connection π Massive Marketing CG CEX CMC and Dextools Trending π Safe with Unique Utility π³ Telegram : https://t.me/ShironekoETH π³ Twitter : https://twitter.com/ShironekoETH π³ Website : https://Shironekoeth.com Called by @LionGems π¦
π3π1
Hey Fam let's start now and get some x today you can shill me your tokens Let's Show Everyone the Power of Lions π¦
Puli Inu Puli has been active for 1 year and has been playing very well, today I decided to share this instead of gambling, it is a meme coin you should keep for the long term. β¨ Portal: https://t.me/PULI_INU π€ Market: https://dextools.io/app/bsc/pair-explorer/0x3ff5cbe338153063d8251d2b6a22a437ec09eef3
π2π₯2β€1
πππ€π£ πππ’π¨ | Organical | pinned Β«Leave Adress in the Comments, when 200 Adress 0.1E for one person Don't Spam β οΈΒ»
BSC project, approaching Shill Me
π2π1π₯1
Which Gem should we share?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
π2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @LionGems. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollβs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Which Gem should we share?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only β there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionβs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionβs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 January 2023 to 13 February 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind β an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank β 1,503,665 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@LionGems named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπππ€π£ πππ’π¨ | Organical |β (@LionGems), 11 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LionGems.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.