Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 54 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 491–501 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
29 Sept 2026, 20:56
493
+1
14 Sept 2026, 19:38
492
-1
6 Sept 2026, 20:39
493
-1
22 Aug 2026, 16:22
494
-4
14 Aug 2026, 17:16
498
-2
7 Aug 2026, 23:53
500
no change
7 Aug 2026, 02:02
500
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
98 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
86
87.8%
💯
6
6.12%
❤
5
5.10%
🙏
1
1.02%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 98 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Wenn Ihnen die Anzahl der Migranten in Berlin noch nicht ausreichen sollte, gibt es eine einfache Lösung: Sie müssen nur die Linken wählen. Die wollen ernsthaft, dass wir die Leute aufnehmen, die die Grenzen der spanischen Exklave Ceuta gestürmt haben. Falls Ihnen diese Idee nicht zusagt, empfehlen wir, Ihre Kreuze bei der AfD zu machen. Wir sind der Auffassung, dass die Anzahl illegaler Migranten jetzt schon deutlic…
Wenn die EU nicht gewillt oder in der Lage ist, ihre Außengrenzen zu schützen, ist die Freizügigkeit innerhalb der EU nicht dauerhaft aufrechtzuerhalten. Auch wenn die Altparteien es gerne verschweigen: Der Schutz der Außengrenzen war und ist eine vereinbarte Voraussetzung, die von allen Mitgliedstaaten akzeptiert wurde. Unter den gegenwärtigen Umständen gibt es zu einem lückenlosen Schutz unserer deutschen Grenzen k…
Die AfD wird die Betrügereien der Altparteien und ihr faschistoides Verhalten während der sogenannten Corona-„Pandemie“ vollumfänglich aufklären. Und die Täter der Justiz übergeben. Sobald der Souverän uns den Regierungsauftrag erteilt.
https://www.tichyseinblick.de/kolumnen/aus-aller-welt/usa-tagebuch-fauci-corona-impfung/
Seit Jahrzehnten versenken die Altparteien Milliarden in Afrika. Sie nennen es „Entwicklungshilfe“. Wenn man sich jedoch nach konkreten Ergebnissen einzelner Projekte erkundigt, herrscht dröhnendes Schweigen. Auch freiwillig werden keinerlei Bilanzen veröffentlicht. Das deutet zumindest darauf hin, dass das gegenwärtige System „Entwicklungshilfe“ wirkungslos sein könnte. Es gehört auf den Prüfstand.
https://www.tichy…
#Marzahn wird blau. Herzlichen Dank @Mike_Moncsek aus Sachsen, Dennis, Jürgen, Pierre, Daniel, Jonas und Caspar für Eure Unterstützung. Ohne Euch wäre das nicht möglich gewesen.
Die spanische Exklave Ceuta wird von illegalen Migranten aus Marokko regelrecht überrannt. Anstatt diese Invasion zu verhindern, unterstützen die spanischen Behörden die Invasoren noch bei der Einreise. Wenn Spanien nicht gewillt ist, sein Territorium zu schützen, muss man daraus Konsequenzen ziehen. Unsere Konsequenz kann nur sein: Die deutschen Grenzen müssen endlich geschlossen und lückenlos kontrolliert werden, b…
👍8💯3
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @LindemannMdA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@LindemannMdA named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@mike_moncsek named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Gunnar Lindemann MdA” (@LindemannMdA), 493 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LindemannMdA.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.