Adult β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegramβs forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts β open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp β in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
βPublished firstβ means first in this corpus. We hold 6 comparable posts for this entry, running 21 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detectorβs own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @LILI_Deals_girlfun. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through β we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channelβs posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable β 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times β 60%, no better than a coin flip β because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channelβs history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying β a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story β and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
13 measurements spanning 38 days, net +78. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean βno change observedβ, never βinterpolatedβ. The vertical axis spans 1,674β1,814 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 00:41
1,777
-14
11 Sept 2026, 02:59
1,791
-6
5 Sept 2026, 20:21
1,797
+1
1 Sept 2026, 21:55
1,796
-2
29 Aug 2026, 17:46
1,798
+19
27 Aug 2026, 00:47
1,779
+13
23 Aug 2026, 22:34
1,766
+28
20 Aug 2026, 15:33
1,738
+33
17 Aug 2026, 12:56
1,705
+15
14 Aug 2026, 05:16
1,690
-10
10 Aug 2026, 15:33
1,700
+1
7 Aug 2026, 21:02
1,699
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:38
1,699
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
13s
Average length
7s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
Reaction mix
39 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
β€
20
51.3%
π
10
25.6%
π₯
9
23.1%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 39 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
It will only cost Β£25 today, you will get a sexting session and live content for 10 minutes, send me a message if you are interested π @LilithVRF1_DealsUK0
βοΈβοΈβοΈβοΈβοΈβοΈβοΈβοΈ
Menssage private dealsβοΈ
@Elizabeth_ASSBABEXXβοΈ
Are you ready to be mine? π
I could be your naughty favorite little temptation always making fun of you, keeping you smiling and helping you forget all that daily stressβοΈ
πππππ Preview π
https://t.me/Elizabeth_Deals
https://t.me/+IhXX1mGGvKk5MTgx
βοΈβοΈβοΈβοΈ βοΈ
βοΈβοΈβοΈβοΈβοΈβοΈβοΈ
https://t.me/Stars_VipXx
ππππ
β€οΈβ€οΈβ€οΈβ€οΈβ€οΈπ
DADDY XX !! πFt/sexting for Β£30
@LilithVRF1_DealsUK0π
πIβm active to please you very rich babe, come and enjoy a delicious hot sexting and youβll see my delicious ass bounce in video call xx π
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Lili_Dealsbabexx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channelβs posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
2
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Lili_Dealsbabexx named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant β a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@elizabeth_deals named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 β 8 August 2026 Β· confirmed gone 11 September 2026 (two independent sightings β see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
@stars_vipxx named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 β 8 August 2026 Β· confirmed gone 11 September 2026 (two independent sightings β see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 β this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
