🛑ESSE PODE SER UM GRANDE CATALISADOR PARA O MERCADO! ATENTOS! https://youtu.be/14jhaAzIqOw Bom dia família!! Tem vídeo novo no canal! Hoje falamos sobre o grande catalisador dessa semana! O simpósio de Jackson hole! No vídeo explico a importância dele e o que pode acontecer dentro dos próximos dias! Boa semana a todos!

Channel
LIGA CRYPTO (CANAL OFICIAL)
@LigaCrypto
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,290subscribers
-54 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001277673935 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LigaCrypto |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LigaCrypto |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:12 | 8,290 | -10 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 07:26 | 8,300 | -8 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 8,308 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:57 | 8,312 | -17 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:13 | 8,329 | -13 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:08 | 8,342 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:00 | 8,344 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:57 | 8,344 | first reading |
Engagement
28 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.74%
- avg views ÷ 8,290 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 476
- 16 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 16
- of 28 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 28 (7 July 2026 – 24 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7,608 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Aug 2026, 16:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈147
- Videos
- ≈2
- Links
- ≈3,910
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
https://youtu.be/hVH28EbRl44
BITCOIN: PREPARE-SE PARA MAIS UMA SEMANA! https://youtu.be/1IE_g7UQJHU
BITOICOIN: ALTA OU QUEDA? https://youtu.be/okHZlkjl1yc
Buenas Família!! A inflação americana veio no MENOR núcleo desde 2021. A bolsa subiu. E o Bitcoin… caiu. 🤔 No vídeo de hoje: ▪️ os 2 relatórios que saíram em 24h ▪️ por que o CORTE de juros nem está na mesa ▪️ tesourarias sob estresse: Metaplanet e Strategy ▪️ e a parte estranha: BlackRock botou US$ 311 BILHÕES na Ethereum O mapa de terça está acontecendo na tela — atualizado com a live do Rodrigo e o ciclo do Cow…
Salve, família! Um aviso importante! ⚠️ A Liga Crypto NUNCA vai procurar ninguém, mandar mensagem no privado, pedir alguma informação ou oferecer algo em troca! Cuidado com Scam’s! Pessoas se passando pela Liga ou interagindo de forma suspeita! Cuidado com links que vocês clicam, principalmente de estranhos! Se virem algo, denunciem e podem enviar para a gente! Tomaremos todas as ações possíveis! Tamo junto e s…
🚨 VÍDEO NOVO — O Banco Central criou um pedágio entre você e a sua carteira. Resolução 584: a partir de janeiro, saque de cripto acima de US$ 10 mil pode ficar RETIDO por até 24h — inclusive stablecoin. No vídeo: quem é pego, quem escapa, e o plano de 4 passos pra se organizar ANTES de janeiro. 👉 https://youtu.be/7UES2EfMEMc
BITCOIN: A SEMANA DA TEMPESTADE? https://youtu.be/k3YhlkbX-EI
Já era pro Clarity Act?! O que isso muda pro Bitcoin? https://youtu.be/KLzaPZkuBS0 vídeo novo na área família! ❤️
🛑INDICADORES APONTAM FRAQUEZA EXTREMA! OPORTUNIDADE? https://youtu.be/yjQqh1Shbh0 Fala família!! Tem vídeo novo no canal! Hoje falamos sobre alguns indicadores que apontam uma fraqueza extrema no btc! Oportunidade?? Falamos sobre esse tema e outros importantes que prometem movimentações nas próximas horas!
BITCOIN PRESTES A EXPLODIR!? https://youtu.be/TzcZWiXZ1a0
Fala, família liga! Bom dia! Saiu o vídeo mais importante da semana pra quem tem cold storage: US$ 114 mi roubados sem tocar em carteira nenhuma — o caso Coldcard. 🚨 — A falha: o "sorteio" da semente virou previsível (desde 2021) — O filme do crime: 4 ondas, 1.816 BTC, 51 BTC de UMA carteira só — A janela de minutos: o único jeito de reagir se estiver acontecendo agora — O checklist do que fazer agora + como se bli…
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @LigaCrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@thiagonigro · 105,609
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 16 August 2026
@bilionaire_masson · 55,336
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LIGA CRYPTO (CANAL OFICIAL)” (@LigaCrypto), 8,290 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LigaCrypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.