Channel
@LibsofTikTok_mv
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,869subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001512374873 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LibsofTikTok_mv |
| Created | 30 June 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LibsofTikTok_mv |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:32 | 1,869 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:51 | 1,871 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:41 | 1,869 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:31 | 1,870 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 1,870 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 February 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 February 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
I have decided to leave telegram completely. The channels won't be deleted, but there won't be any new posts either. The invitation links for the private channels will stop working once i delete my accounts, so join them now if you want to see them: - The Bunker https://t.me/joinchat/pxi7gqAkxBAzMTUy - The Radicalization Library https://t.me/+qdj61DuoQLpmNjMx - Also throwing in this one, will be probably deleted so…
This guy was reportedly kicked off a flight because he had “let’s go Brandon” written on his mask and refused to change masks. @Allegiant employee claims it’s an “FAA regulation” https://t.co/4ipRbqggEB twitter | 2022-02-16 @libsoftiktok
Infuriating. https://t.co/5ewTy9Mtx2 twitter | 2022-02-15 @libsoftiktok
This teacher thinks she’s totally immune from parents being involved in their children’s education https://t.co/q81rBFDYkI twitter | 2022-02-15 @libsoftiktok
"You can wear the mask on your f****** b*lls! If you don't wear the f****** mask, you get the f*** out of here!" - Board Member at @Glenbrook_south to public commenter https://t.co/aPMqDLrVFf twitter | 2022-02-15 @libsoftiktok
.@NYCMayor maybe focus on the surge in violent crime plaguing NYC instead of causing racial divide and playing victim? twitter | 2022-02-15 @libsoftiktok
This occured at @CCSD59. The worst part- they still voted to keep mask mandates in place. These hypocrites do not care about children. twitter | 2022-02-15 @libsoftiktok
Ouch 😬 https://t.co/CyZS79Uu4j twitter | 2022-02-15 @libsoftiktok
@BrianClowdus We should raise money twitter | 2022-02-15 @libsoftiktok
The sheer levels of narcissism https://t.co/yYd0ciCPB6 twitter | 2022-02-15 @libsoftiktok
“Snowpeople” is newspeak. It’s called snowman. Also, this never happened 😂 https://t.co/ozyjGMrY7H twitter | 2022-02-15 @libsoftiktok
@ConceptualJames Lol twitter | 2022-02-15 @libsoftiktok
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @LibsofTikTok_mv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 444,435 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@LibsofTikTok_mv named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Libs of TikTok Mirror” (@LibsofTikTok_mv), 1,869 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LibsofTikTok_mv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.