Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝘾𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙖𝙮𝙖 𝙇𝙚𝙫𝙞

@Levi6_9

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

118subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002089135987
TypeChannel
Username@Levi6_9
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Levi6_9

Growth

11811 Aug 2026, 14:46 — 118 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 21:03 — 118 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 14:4611 Aug 2026, 21:03
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 117–119 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 21:03118no change
11 Aug 2026, 14:46118first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 30 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
73.5%
avg views ÷ 118 subscribers
Avg views / post
86.8
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held17 (30 June 20262 August 2026)
Views total1,041
Reactions total63
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
53s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

68 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52962545593147899381420.6%
custom 51950312382341027161319.1%
custom 52043195087386218241319.1%
custom 59406852650214398801014.7%
custom 5188278896809753831913.2%
custom 523119819576104022657.35%
custom 525375622728805462322.94%
custom 520430166314952834311.47%
custom 525169079899025004711.47%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC50 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @levissssssssasssVideo

Откровенно говоря, я не могу определиться, кто из них больше мне подходит. Интересный факт: я на двух видео с одной и той же футболки с Годжо.

custom 52537562272880546232custom 52043016631495283431custom 52516907989902500471

1 Aug 2026, 17:52 UTC62 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🐾 рт;мью; вп;

custom 52043195087386218245custom 51882788968097538312custom 52311981957610402261

1 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTCviews —

𝘾𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙖𝙮𝙖 𝙇𝙚𝙫𝙞 pinned «Через месяц у меня будет великий праздник, я постарею, мне будет 18 годков. Шутки про старость уместны. Ха-ха. Вообще-то я решил составить виш лист, вдруг кто-то захочет сделать приятно, буду очень благодарен.🖤🖤 https://followish.io/mywishlist/mvlnbwnydqelke.…»

1 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC69 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Через месяц у меня будет великий праздник, я постарею, мне будет 18 годков. Шутки про старость уместны. Ха-ха. Вообще-то я решил составить виш лист, вдруг кто-то захочет сделать приятно, буду очень благодарен.🖤🖤 https://followish.io/mywishlist/mvlnbwnydqelke. По вопросам лучше писать в анонимку 😆

custom 59406852650214398802custom 51882788968097538311custom 52043195087386218241custom 52311981957610402261

31 Jul 2026, 21:11 UTC68 viewsread 11 August 2026

Всё, я просрал лето. 😭 Почему так быстро!

29 Jul 2026, 21:06 UTC71 views11 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @Tian_030Photo

🎉на часах 00:00 30 июля, а это значит, что сегодня я праздную свой ✨день рождения✨ с 20ти летием меня ☺️ спасибо вам всем, что подписываетесь на мой тгк или тик ток и наблюдаете за моим творчеством, я благодарна каждому доброму слову и комплименту, вы у меня самые лучшие❤️❤️❤️ я продолжаю творить в том же духе, радовать вас и себя косплеями, образами, а также повышать свой скилл. надеюсь я смогу чаще появляться на ф

custom 52962545593147899385custom 51882788968097538313custom 51950312382341027163

26 Jul 2026, 13:19 UTC94 viewsread 11 August 2026

Мне чуть-чуть стало плохо, поэтому я еду домой. Сори, эм, сори.

26 Jul 2026, 08:55 UTC93 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Вот такой красивый еду на Кико.🫥

custom 52962545593147899384custom 59406852650214398803custom 52043195087386218241

18 Jul 2026, 16:51 UTC119 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 51950312382341027162custom 52043195087386218242custom 52311981957610402262

18 Jul 2026, 15:25 UTC103 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @NirvananaxyuVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 51882788968097538311custom 52043195087386218241custom 52962545593147899381

18 Jul 2026, 14:48 UTC105 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 51950312382341027162custom 52962545593147899382custom 59406852650214398802custom 51882788968097538311

18 Jul 2026, 14:48 UTC107 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 52043195087386218243custom 51882788968097538311custom 51950312382341027161custom 52311981957610402261custom 52962545593147899381custom 59406852650214398801

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Levi6_9. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,163,111 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝘾𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙖𝙮𝙖 𝙇𝙚𝙫𝙞” (@Levi6_9), 118 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Levi6_9.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.