Channel
@Letsbitthatfuckingbullet
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
212subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 4 November 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003522422139 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Letsbitthatfuckingbullet |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 4 November 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Letsbitthatfuckingbullet |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 22:36 | 212 | +1 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 04:22 | 211 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 19 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (19 October 2026 – 3 November 2026) |
| Views total | 7,543 |
| Reactions total | 72 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 04:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
72 reactions across 15 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 53 | 73.6% | |
| 🤝 | 8 | 11.1% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 9.72% | |
| 💘 | 4 | 5.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 72 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 19 October 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 17 posts held from the last 30 days (29.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
نمیدونم چطوری بگم ولی اتاق نسیم و این کتاباش که روی هم چیده شدن، خودش به تنهایی میتونه حس یه خونه کاملو بهم بده. اصن خونه که هیچی، حتی حس جاییو میده که دلم میخواد یه عصر بارونی (یا حتی برفی) با یه قهوه داغ بشینم وسطش و غرق بشم واسه خودم.
❤2
مایندست درست :
یه چالشی داریم برای ادمینای عزیز... اگه دوست دارید چنل شمام گیفت داشته باشه مثل چنلما این پیام رو فووروارد کنید توی چنلاتون و حتما توی چنل عِمــٰآد | Emٓad و T A جوین باشید. قراره قرعه کشی کنیم و به قید قرعه به ۱۰ تا از چنلایی که فووروارد کردن و توی این دو چنل جوین بودن گیفت اهدا کنیم.
این روزا خیلی زیاد بلاتکلیفم و من.. من از بلاتکلیفی بدم میاد. البته کیه که خوشش بیاد؟ ولی منظورم اینه که من با هر اتفاقی که تحت کنترلم نباشه، یا زندگیمو از کنترلم دربیاره به مشکل میخورم؛ اصلا میخوام باهاش گلاویز شم! ولی خب زندگی من همیشه پر از اتفاقایی بوده که من مجبور بودم بخاطرشون یه مدتی رو سردرگم باشم و هیچجوره هم نتونم نجات پیدا کنم. یعنی دیدین وقتی یه بچه از یه کاری بدش میاد، میذارنش توی اون موقعیت که یاد بگیر…
🤝8❤1
فقط احساس کردم باید بازم تاکید کنم که از غلط و نزدههاتون نترسین و فقط سعی کنین راهحل براشون پیدا کنین. اصلا هرچی غلط و نزدههاتون توی اول مسیر کمتر باشه، بدتره! چرا؟ چون ایرادا و ضعفاتون درنمیاد. فکر نکنین کسایی که از اول میشینن پای تست همه رو درست میزنن، آدمای خیلی خفنین. اگه طرف همهچیو بلد باشه که الان داره توی دانشگاه درس میخونه، نه واسه کنکور! پس سعی کنین تا میتونین ایراداتتونو بکشین بیرون بجای اینکه روی خودتو…
🔥7
یکی از بزرگترین چیزایی که به هر کنکوریی کمک میکنه که نتایج خوب بگیره، همین "پیوستگی"ئه. یعنی شما یه روز 21 ساعت درس بخونی ولی دو روز بعدش هیچی نخونی، از کسی که هر 3 روز، 7 ساعت خونده به مراتب عقبتر قرار میگیری. چرا؟ چون با وجود برابر بودن جمع ساعت مطالعههای سه روز، یکی پیوستگی داشته و یکی نه. اتفاقا برعکس ادامه پیام دکتر یاسمن عزیز، میخوام بگم من درک نمیکنم کسی رو که هدف داره و در کنارش میشینه توی گوشی ساعتها اخبا…
❤4
در راستای علاقه ستی به مربعها باید بگم یه زمانی همچین چالشی راه انداخت و هممونو به مربع و دایره بازی دعوت کرد :
❤10
اینم شاید فکر کنین دیگه همه انجام میدن دیگه. اتفاقا نه! همه میوفتن توی تله تراز و درصد و مقایسه و یادشون میره که دنبال راهحل باشن. یا اصلا راهحلو پیدا میکنن ولی هیچوقت انجامش نمیدن. میخوان انجام بدنا ولی انقدر براشون جدی نیست. ضعفاشون انقدر توی مغزشون پررنگ شده که نهایتا میگن "همینی که هستیم دیگه". این دقیقا روش مغز برای جلوگیری از تلاش بیشتر و نگهداشتنتون توی شرایط امنه!
❤3
شاید فکر کنین اینا رو که همه میگن و همه هم رعایت میکنن؛ ولی سخت در اشتباهین! بزرگترین ضعف بچههای دبیرستان دقیقا توی همین موارد خلاصه میشه (و حتی گاهی عامل موفق نشدنشونم همیناست). خلاصه که جدی بگیرید. نه تنها جدی بگیرید، بلکه حواستونو جمع کنین که توی دام کارای اشتباه نیوفتین.
❤2
واکنش درست وقتی یکی داره قیافهی کسی رو مسخره میکنه، این نیست که بگی: «وااای، ببینمش» واکنش درست اینه که بخندی؟ نه! بگی: «خب که چی؟ خودش انتخاب نکرده چه شکلی باشه، تو چرا انتخاب کردی بیشعور باشی؟» واکنش درست وقتی عکس یا فیلم خصوصی کسی پخش میشه، این نیست که بگی: «برای منم بفرستین.» واکنش درست اینه که نه ببینیش، نه پخشش کنی، نه درخواستش رو بدی و اگه میتونی، برای حذف شدنش گزارش بدی. واکنش درست وقتی دربارهی کسی شا…
❤6
چقدرررر قشنگه. مررررسی♥️ با همین ادامه کتابمو میخونم.
❤4
بیکلامه دوس داشتی گوش بده🥲🍓
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Letsbitthatfuckingbullet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Biting the Bullet” (@Letsbitthatfuckingbullet), 212 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Letsbitthatfuckingbullet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.