Channel
@Lesanhagh
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,362subscribers
-15 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002007375683 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Lesanhagh |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Lesanhagh |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:28 | 1,362 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 1,364 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:34 | 1,365 | -1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 16:26 | 1,366 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 14:45 | 1,368 | -6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:42 | 1,374 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 1,376 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:45 | 1,377 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 1,377 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 4 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (4 June 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 652 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 05:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
🔥الاتجاهات المهمهفی علم الرجال العمریه🔥 ذهبی در شرح حال عبدالله بن محمد بن عبدالعزیز البغوی به نکته ی رجالی مهمهی اشارت دارد و ان این است که اگر ثقه ای که وثاقت او محرز شده است متهم شد به سرقت حدیث،بدان اتهام اهمیتی داده نمیشود و رد میشود همچنین اتهام به سرقه الحدیث جرح مبهم است نه مفسر ولا قیمه له . این قاعده به جهت امثله برای مثلا محمد بن جعفر الفیدی راوی حدیث مدینه العلم که ابن جوزی او را متهم کرده به سرقت حدیث …
Signed ●یّآدَخيلُ الكافّل●
🔥حیدر السعد مداح عراقی در کربلا: سیستانی واسطهای برای علم غیب و نایب امام مهدی (علیه السلام) و معنا و سرور کره زمین است!!!! ⭕️بعد همینا رو راجع به امام امیر المومنین علیه السلام و سایر اهل بیت علیهم السلام به کار ببریم میشه غلو و مریدان قاسم علی احمدی و غلوپژوهی تکفیرمون میکنن! بارها گفتیم عامدانه شئونات اهل بیت علیهم السلام رو انکار میکنن تا راه رو برای کارخونه امامسازیشون باز کنن! ❌فقط سینهزدنشون با این مزخر…
Signed ●یّآدَخيلُ الكافّل●
🔥انوار الاحادیث 🔥 💠نباید حدیثی را رد کرد حتی اگر خلاف عقل و محیر العقول بود و انکار هر حدیثی برابر با کفر است 👁🗨در این روایت صراحتا عبارت فلم یعقله امده یعنی اگر خلاف عقل بود اگر عقلش قبول نکرد حق انکار ندارد و انکار برابر با کفر است : 📜حَدَّثَنَا أَحْمَدُ بْنُ مُحَمَّدٍ عَنِ اَلْحَسَنِ بْنِ مَحْبُوبٍ عَنْ جَمِيلِ بْنِ صَالِحٍ عَنْ أَبِي عُبَيْدَةَ اَلْحَذَّاءِ عَنْ أَبِي جَعْفَرٍ عَلَيْهِ اَلسَّلاَمُ قَالَ سَم…
Signed ●یّآدَخيلُ الكافّل●
Posted without readable text
🎙 - صوت ضبط شده ی مناظره علمی امشب ▪️ پیرامون - تقليد مصطلح از منظر عقل | جلسه دوم 👤 | مخالف - شیخ علیشاه حسنی اخباری « از مدیران گروه علمی کتیبة المحدثین » 👤 | موافق - جناب آقای مرتضی - @Rahnamaye_Aghayed |
Signed ●یّآدَخيلُ الكافّل●
🎙مناظره تقلید مصطلح در نقل استاذ شیخ علیشاه الاخباري - @Rahnamaye_Aghayed |
Signed ●یّآدَخيلُ الكافّل●
🔥هدی الطالب في أسرار علم الرجال 🔥 📜پاسخ به ادعای حجت بودن شبهه علم رجال 📜 💢بیان ادعا: 👤اقای حسین فواد المرزوق در کتابش مسمی به التعارض بین الجرح والتعدیل برای حجیت مراسیل رجالی گوید : ان اخبار الرجالیین عن احوال الرواه یوجب العلم بان وسائطهم الثقات 💠الجواب: چطور شخصی میتواند همچین ادعایی کند ؟ الاول الثقات در کدام منهج؟ مگر ده ها راوی نداریم که نجاشی ثقه میداند و شیخ ضعیف یا بالعکس؟ این وسائطهم الثقات از نظر …
Signed ●یّآدَخيلُ الكافّل●
🔥برهان القاطع فی بطلان بدعة التقلید 🔥 👤--اعتراف سید محسن حکیم زعیم حوزه علمیه به اولا ضعف سند و دلالت مهم ترین دلیل روایی تقلید که مجتهدین و مقلیدن می اورند یعنی 《 روایت فللعوام ان یقلدوه 》 📜خبر الاحتجاج المروي عن تفسير العسكري (ع) الآتي ذكره ، فإنه ـ مع ضعفه في نفسه ـ ظاهر في اعتبار الامانة والوثوق ، كما يظهر من ملاحظته بتمامه. مع أن مورده أصول الدين التي لا يجوز فيها التقليد ولا يقبل فيها الخبر تعبداً ، فلا ب…
Signed ●یّآدَخيلُ الكافّل●
العباساغیثینی قـــــلّادهامبگیــر،نَهتـوبادست،باپَـرَت ایصاحبم،نظریجــــانِمـــادرت
Signed ●یّآدَخيلُ الكافّل●
[ آجَـــرَکَاللهیـابَـقــیَّـةاللهیـاصـاحِـبَالـزَّمان ..- روایت است که چون تنگ شد بر او میدان فتاده ز حرکت و ذوالجناح از جولان نه ذوالجناح دگر تاب استقامت داشت نه سیٌدالشٌهداء بر جدال طاقت داشت هوا ز باد مخالف چو قیرگون گردید عزیز فاطمه از اسب سرنگون گردید بلند مرتبه شاهی ز صدر زین افتاد اگر غلط نکنم عرش بر زمین افتاد #شرمندمکهزندم
Signed ●یّآدَخيلُ الكافّل●
صلّی الله علیک یابن المجتبی قاسم گیسو حریرِ عشوه گر رعنا قدِ قرصِ قمر پیش لبش شهد و شکر هست از هلاهل تلخ تر دامِ خطَش باشد کنار چون جان برم از زلف یار؟ شمشیر میخواهد چکار؟؛ ابرو که دارد این پسر #اسير
Signed ●یّآدَخيلُ الكافّل●
#قاسمبنالحسن دست ِایام دراز است بگو باز کند نو عروسِ حرمِ فاطمه خلخالش را #ایوای💔
Signed ●یّآدَخيلُ الكافّل●
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Lesanhagh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,117,349 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“| لسان الحق ـ” (@Lesanhagh), 1,362 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Lesanhagh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.