Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ЛЕПС

@Leps11

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

114subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001663589814
TypeChannel
Username@Leps11
Descriptionhttps://instagram.com/lepsky_maxim?igshid=OGQ5ZDc2ODk2ZA==
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Leps11

Growth

1147 August 2026 — 114 subscribers9 August 2026 — 114 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 113–115 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 06:02114no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:08114first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 7 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
68
Videos
35
Links
24

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
32s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

66 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😱1015.2%
❤‍🔥913.6%
💔812.1%
🔥812.1%
🙏812.1%
👍710.6%
💯710.6%
69.09%
😭34.55%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 66reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 7 September 2025 to 24 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Nov 2025, 18:04 UTC439 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @fcfightnightsPhoto

ЛЕПС ⌛️ Время поговорить о форвардах с Дмитрием Кортавой: Не согласен с теми, кто считает, что форварды в FN это больная тема. Нападающие в FN выполняют определённые задачи на поле и, на мой взгляд, решают их успешно. Очень понравилось подписание Лепса, который добавил команде вариативности в атаке. Снова отмечаю работу Димы Шишкова и думаю, что Лепс в форме FN еще пошумит в лиге! Возможно, не только в офсайдах 😅

4

Signed ᕦ(ò_óˇ)ᕤ

18 Sept 2025, 11:33 UTC520 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @fcfightnightsVideo

😅СНИМАЕМ ПРОКЛЯТИЕ ЛЕПСА😅 😏 Не могли оставить без внимания лучшего бомбардира нашей команды по голам из офсайда. 🍺 Лепс уверен в том, что в воскресенье обязательно забьет, а потом проставит немного пенного напитка. А мы и не против! ⚽️ @fcfightnights

🔥3

Signed ᕦ(ò_óˇ)ᕤ

17 Sept 2025, 13:01 UTC425 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Увидимся 21 сентября в 20:30

❤‍🔥3🙏1

Signed ᕦ(ò_óˇ)ᕤ

13 Sept 2025, 18:53 UTC430 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @fcfightnightsPhoto

Нет, это не покер Аршавина… 😕 Это Лепсу не везёт, и он забивает уже четвёртый гол из офсайда в этом Кубке Лиги… СМОТРИМ ВМЕСТЕ ⚽️ 0 - 0 ⚽️

😭31

Signed ᕦ(ò_óˇ)ᕤ

13 Sept 2025, 14:16 UTC362 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

https://vkvideo.ru/video-212508059_456243468

👍2

Signed ᕦ(ò_óˇ)ᕤ

12 Sept 2025, 09:05 UTC332 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @fcfightnightsPhoto

🪄ФЭНТЕЗИ🪄 🔥 Острый выбился в лидеры фэнтези среди наших игроков ❤️, если выбираем игроков FN на ближайший тур, который начинается уже завтра в 11:30 ⚽️ @fcfightnights

🙏3

Signed ᕦ(ò_óˇ)ᕤ

7 Sept 2025, 16:24 UTC306 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @fcfightnightsPhoto

ВЫШЛИ В СЛЕДУЮЩИЙ РАУНД 🔝Устроили качели в первом тайме, а во втором показали свое преимущество! А кто сегодня лучший? ❤️ — ЖДАН 🔥 — ОСТРЫЙ 👍 — САФА 👏🏻 — ДУДИК 👌 — БАТИК 😱 — ЛЕПС ⚽️ @fcfightnights

😱10

Signed ᕦ(ò_óˇ)ᕤ

7 Sept 2025, 16:23 UTC271 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

5:2 Идём дальше 💪🏻

👍51

Signed ᕦ(ò_óˇ)ᕤ

7 Sept 2025, 11:41 UTC266 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @fcfightnightsVideo

ГООООООООЛ ЛЕЕЕЕПС ⚽️ 1 — 0 ⚽️ 📺 Трансляция ⚽️ @fcfightnights

💯7

Signed ᕦ(ò_óˇ)ᕤ

7 Sept 2025, 10:59 UTC250 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @fcfightnightsPhoto

🤝СПАСИБО🤝 🔝Благодарим футбольные клубы Тандем и Ростов за тренировочную экипировку для наших игроков ✌🏻Ждём вашу поддержку на сегодняшнем матче 🏟️ Москвич (малое поле) ⏰ 14:00 📺 Трансляция 🎫 Билеты ⚽️ @fcfightnights

❤‍🔥4

Signed ᕦ(ò_óˇ)ᕤ

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @Leps11. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ЛЕПС” (@Leps11), 114 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Leps11.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.