Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Lennon's Cave

@Lennon_Cave

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,156subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002538296127
TypeChannel
Username@Lennon_Cave
Descriptionکانال رسمی امید لنون لینک کانال یوتوب: https://www.youtube.com/@omidlennon لینک کانال توییچ: https://www.twitch.tv/omid_lennon لینک کانال کیک https://www.kick.com/omid_lennon لینک گروه چت کامیونیتی: https://t.me/Lennons_Chosen_Ones
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Lennon_Cave

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

6,150 average views per post against 5,156 subscribers — an engagement rate of 119.3%. Across the 12,155 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,163–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 5.73% and 23.7%, with a median of 12.3%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (13 July 2026 12 August 2026)
Posts measured21 of 21 published in the window (0 exact, 21 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled129,200
Mature posts only123.5% over 20 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers5,156 measured 10 August 2026
Cohortb3162:fas · 12,155 channels · p10 2.57% · p25 5.73% · p50 12.3% · p75 23.7% · p90 40.5%
Position in cohort99.078th percentile · 9.7× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.024% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languagePersian · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

5,1565,1595,157.510 Aug 2026, 01:16 — 5,159 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 17:01 — 5,156 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 01:1610 Aug 2026, 17:01
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,156–5,159 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 17:015,156-3
10 Aug 2026, 01:165,159first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
119.3%
avg views ÷ 5,156 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,150
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.49%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held21 (24 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total129,200
Reactions total5,804
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:42 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
155
Videos
11
Links
105

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

5,804 reactions across 21 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4,03969.6%
👍63911.0%
😁5779.94%
😢3005.17%
👎1422.45%
😡741.27%
🤯330.569%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,804reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
42
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 21 we hold a reading for · 48%
Most on one post
13
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Lennon_Cave. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 16:04 UTC≈1,860 views78 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

گلخان این ویدئوی داستانی رو برای هیلو ساخته و پیشنهاد می‌کنم اگر این سری رو دوست دارید حتما تماشاش کنید تا پیش‌زمینه داستانی و داستان نسخه اول دستتون بیاد: https://youtu.be/UX7bKXetLUs

76👎2

8 Aug 2026, 18:56 UTC≈2,840 views104 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

در مورد استریم امروز

101👎3

8 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC≈3,220 views133 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

128👍3👎2

7 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC≈4,340 views336 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

خب به نظر می‌رسه که این دفعه شانس با ما یار بود و برای پلی‌تست انتخاب شدیم.

320🤯12👍2👎2

7 Aug 2026, 08:37 UTC≈4,290 views124 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Voice message

در مورد نتایج نتورک تست The Duskbloods

117👍5👎2

6 Aug 2026, 14:33 UTC≈4,290 views434 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔥 از مرز ۱۴ میلیون ویو هم عبور کردیم. ممنونم ازتون ❤️

425👎7👍1😡1

4 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC≈5,570 views176 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💯 اینم از ویدیوی امروز امیدوارم که ازش لذت ببرید 🔗 لینک تماشای ویدیو

168👍6👎2

3 Aug 2026, 23:27 UTC≈6,020 views312 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

الان به بدترین شکل گشنمه و چیزی هم دم دستم نیست که بخورم. خسته‌ام و تدوین ویدیوی جدیدمون هم تازه تموم شد. واسه همین تصمیم گرفتم خیلی بی‌دلیل این رو بذارم اینجا! همه‌جا هم الان تعطیله و باهم گشنگی می‌کشیم. (اونایی که استریم‌های تحلیل غذا رو یادشون باشه، با این محتوا آشنایی دارن) 🤪

😢22552😁28👎4😡3

3 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC≈5,340 views185 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

سهیل یه سری کار جدید آورده که این یکی از نمونه‌هاش بود که دیدم. کلی هالونایت جدید موجود کرده. فازش رو داشتید، بهش پیام بدید و ازش خرید کنید. 🔗 لینک پیج اینستاگرام سهیل

171👍6👎4🤯4

2 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC≈5,190 views300 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔥 این محتوای جدید کانال رو اگه دوست داشته باشید، می‌تونیم ادامه بدیم. توی ویدیو به شکل مفصل درباره این پلی‌لیست صحبت کردم. 🔗 لینک تماشای ویدیو

259👍35👎6

1 Aug 2026, 20:47 UTC≈5,030 views556 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

یکی از عجیب‌ترین مکالمه‌ها با یکی از شما بعد از یه سال مسج داد و هدفش همین بود 😂❤️

😁51037🤯6👍1👎1😡1

31 Jul 2026, 15:02 UTC≈5,720 views177 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

171👎6

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @Lennon_Cave. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 292,854 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Lennon's Cave” (@Lennon_Cave), 5,156 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Lennon_Cave.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.