С новой ГОЙДОЙ!! Ой, с наступившим!!!!) 😁😈😁😎😁😈😁
🔥12❤6🤮3🎄2💅2❤🔥1🥰1😁1

Channel
@Legends_Diary
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
247subscribers
-13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001739490042 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Legends_Diary |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Legends_Diary |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Oct 2026, 13:57 | 247 | -1 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 13:17 | 248 | -5 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 03:56 | 253 | -2 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 03:21 | 255 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:47 | 257 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 10:25 | 259 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:27 | 260 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 260 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 31 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
133 reactions across 14 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 38 | 28.6% | |
| 😁 | 23 | 17.3% | |
| 🔥 | 16 | 12.0% | |
| 🐳 | 7 | 5.26% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 5.26% | |
| 😎 | 6 | 4.51% | |
| 🤣 | 6 | 4.51% | |
| 😭 | 4 | 3.01% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 3.01% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 2.26% | |
| 🤮 | 3 | 2.26% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 1.50% | |
| 🎄 | 2 | 1.50% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 1.50% | |
| 💅 | 2 | 1.50% | |
| 😈 | 2 | 1.50% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 1.50% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.752% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.752% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.752% | |
| 1 further kind | 1 | 0.752% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 133 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 31 August 2025 to 31 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
С новой ГОЙДОЙ!! Ой, с наступившим!!!!) 😁😈😁😎😁😈😁
🔥12❤6🤮3🎄2💅2❤🔥1🥰1😁1
File, posted without a caption
❤4👍2🔥2🌚1
Темы дипломных работ за 4 года). Возможно это даст кому-нибудь понимание того, что годится для разработки дипломного проекта. За этот год как-то ещё не надыбал))))). #диплом
❤6🐳1🔥1😁1
Не знаю почему, но есть проблемы с мобильным тг: первые сообщения 3 не видны, а последний - отображается. Последние 2 поста были по сообщениям 3-6, а у людей видно только последнее, но с компьютера - видны все. Какой-то баг телеги)
👍5🐳1😁1
*это как вопрос, что появилось первее: яйцо или курица - только более решаемое)))
😁4🐳1
Интересны ли мысли о том, как можно было бы решить проблему "первого администратора"?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Интересны ли подробности моего дипломного проекта?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
ПРОДОЛЖЕНИЕ 😁. Председатель комиссии невзначай намекнул ему, что пора закруглятся)))). После чего он задал вопрос: "Сколько времени Вам на разработку этого проекта понадобилось?" - кратко ответить я не сумел, так как подход у меня был интересный, так как и тема меня "трогала": "На разработку проекта понадобилось около года.. В конце 3-го курса я загорелся идеей данного проекта, на производственно-технологи…
❤3😁3🐳1😱1
9) ДИПЛОМ: Как проходила моя защита 😁. Ооооооо, я это долго помнить буду)))). Начну с того, что регламент защиты, в сумме, минут 10-12, иногда и меньше выходило у людей, а у меня аж 26 минут)))))))))))))))). Всё изначально пошло не как нужно))))): презентацию сделал поздновато, речь не подготовил (сделал, но только раз прочитал), к диплому был готов на все почти 100 и относительно к защите максимальн…
❤4😱3🐳1
Наконец-то собрался с мыслями, чтобы описать защиту диплома).
🎉3❤1🐳1
8) ДИПЛОМ: Советики и мысли для рассуждения. Информационные посылы пунктов: -) выбор темы для дипломного проекта; -) подход к выбору архитектуры реализуемого приложения; -) совет для записки, но, в первую очередь, для защиты дипломного проекта. -) Повторюсь с постом 4, ибо, как заметно, многие или плохо его поняли, или быстро прочли и не разобрались, или просто не решительны: для дипломного прое…
❤8👎1😭1
Если кому-то нужна помощь с выбором темы или что-то подсказать - пишите, пока время ещё позволяет, помогу чем смогу). *уже человечкам 11 помог с темами, если не больле))))), память стала уже подводить, ох уж эта старость.. эхехе
❤5😭2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @Legends_Diary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Интересны ли мысли о том, как можно было бы решить проблему "первого администратора"?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Интересны ли подробности моего дипломного проекта?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 31 August 2025 to 31 December 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Legend's Diary” (@Legends_Diary), 247 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Legends_Diary.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.