Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🌚Лёфа🌚

@Leefiaa

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,824subscribers

+581 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003721411536
TypeChannel
Username@Leefiaa
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 22 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Leefiaa

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

5,780 average views per post against 4,824 subscribers — an engagement rate of 119.9%. Across the 40,483 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,163–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 7.15% and 26.5%, with a median of 14.2%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (13 July 2026 12 August 2026)
Posts measured11 of 11 published in the window (0 exact, 11 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled63,620
Mature posts only127.9% over 10 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers4,824 measured 12 August 2026
Cohortb3162:rus · 40,483 channels · p10 3.46% · p25 7.15% · p50 14.2% · p75 26.5% · p90 43.8%
Position in cohort99.385th percentile · 8.4× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.062% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

4,2434,8244,533.56 August 2026 — 4,243 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,332 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,668 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,824 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +581. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,156–4,911 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 19:334,824+156
9 Aug 2026, 22:214,668+336
7 Aug 2026, 04:424,332+89
6 Aug 2026, 18:314,243first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 22 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
119.9%
avg views ÷ 4,824 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,780
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
14.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held18 (22 June 202611 August 2026)
Views total63,620
Reactions total8,965
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 05:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

14,813 reactions across 18 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7,82652.8%
❤‍🔥2,05613.9%
🔥1,50810.2%
💘1,0046.78%
🥰9026.09%
🍓8385.66%
🌚2161.46%
🌭1961.32%
🍌1460.986%
👀830.56%
🥴180.122%
🦄100.068%
😭70.047%
🙈30.02%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,813reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
65
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 18 we hold a reading for · 72%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Leefiaa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 June 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 17:36 UTC≈1,920 views683 reactions4 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Меня прикалывает что первые три арта с этого набора одинаковые Актив обязательно с правой стороны и такой 🐱хехе А пассив слева, поднята нога и он такой 😱🤤

418🍓141🔥91❤‍🔥12💘9👀5🥴3🌚1

9 Aug 2026, 14:28 UTC≈3,150 views509 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Решила все таки сделать такой слот 💋💋 Вся инфа на картинке Ставки пишите под этим постом, ответом друг дружке👀👀

338❤‍🔥83👀61🔥11🍓8🍌3💘3🌚2

8 Aug 2026, 18:40 UTC≈3,650 views920 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ламповая дружеская посиделка 😇 Так и не смогла решить с каким фоном лучше, а другие я делать не умею, наверно вы заметили хд

564❤‍🔥191🔥95🍓19💘10🥰8🦄8🌭7

8 Aug 2026, 14:25 UTC≈3,850 views697 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Бро словил скример 😀 Коротко о том как я развлекаюсь пока рисую хд

448❤‍🔥126🔥75🥰24🍓10🌭6💘6🍌1

6 Aug 2026, 14:43 UTC≈4,840 views1,093 reactions7 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Щас активно приходят новенькие из вк и других мест, надеюсь вы не сильно афигеваете что вас первыи делом встречает это вххввхвхв Помню кто-то очень просил лесби, вот, надеюсь тебе понравится 👹

703🥰188🔥143❤‍🔥24🍓13💘11🍌5🌭4

2 Aug 2026, 11:50 UTC≈7,050 views833 reactions4 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

август, сезон дынь🌟 Это кста первая норм картинка которуя я рисовала от и до в прокре :D честно думала выйдет хуже хд Но надо бы еще попрактиковаться поэтому думаю в ближайшее время возьму еще слотик тестовый

553🔥134❤‍🔥105🍓17👀11💘8🍌5

29 Jul 2026, 20:05 UTC≈7,460 views969 reactions10 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ладно, не долго музыка играла (хотя ютуб еще держится) Зато принесла тут кое што 🌚наконец я опробовала свои ✨special✨ кисточки в деле ыхыхы

❤‍🔥615202🔥118💘14🍓12🥰3🙈3🌚1

26 Jul 2026, 13:48 UTC≈7,330 views724 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Обожаю как получились эти волосы🫦🫦🫦🫦🫦🫦 У меня кстати наконец спустя долгое время открыты заказы на полноценки :D все здесь @Lefiacmm Там также можно купить мои кисти, я наконец их нормально структурировала так сказать хд

476❤‍🔥131🍌71🍓17🔥13💘9🥰6🌭1

21 Jul 2026, 13:21 UTC≈8,640 views489 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Решила полистать галерею и нашла рисунки которым года 4. Прикол в том что они были нарисованы от и до на маленьком лагающем телефоне пальцем🥲🔫 и мне было совершенно комфортно.. И че самое важное, я была настолько гигачадом ЧТО ВСЕГДА РИСОВАЛА ВСЕМ НОЗДРИ😭😭 не знаю почему, но для меня это всегда был и будет показатель крутости, типо ноздри очень сложно нарисовать подходящими и не портящими лицо (у меня до сих пор э

319💘75❤‍🔥66🔥14🍓6👀5🍌4

20 Jul 2026, 18:17 UTC≈7,640 views1,083 reactions7 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Богатый мужчина (богатый 💸 ) играет в игру для богатых (он богат☝️) отправлю в ашди качестве чтобы вы в деталях рассмотрели его 🌰 я чо зря старалась ато хд

714🔥192🥰129❤‍🔥22🍓12💘9🍌5

15 Jul 2026, 16:47 UTC≈8,090 views965 reactions10 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Из нашенского прилежного мальчика в триполосого поцыка🥀 вот до чего доводит общение с инопрешиленцами👺👺👺

💘608❤‍🔥198🌚8639🍓17🥴9🔥6🍌2

8 Jul 2026, 20:38 UTC≈9,320 views657 reactions8 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Шабака улыбака Чисто по ощущениям для меня рисование этого арта - это второй самый фурри поступок в моей жизни Первый раз был когда я год назад полностью прочитала мангу бистарс, и честно, последние главы я прочитала чисто ради галочки тк там такая херота кринжовая началась под конец🥲по ощущениям я будто посмотрела какой то фильм Марвел (сорри, терпеть их не могу)

🔥387❤‍🔥122102💘15🍓9🥰9🌚7😭5

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Leefiaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 55,488 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🌚Лёфа🌚” (@Leefiaa), 4,824 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Leefiaa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.