Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

//Киа//ушла//

@LeeNevi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

47subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003962442815
TypeChannel
Username@LeeNevi
DescriptionКиа Беренсон Твоя отправная точка в мир онлайн индустрии! Текст: @shinniport Фд::Беренсонсы Связь со мной: @JournalistNevi_bot Все анкеты,кидайте в бота. Смайлик::👾 Мой буст:: https://t.me/boost/LeeNevi Цель::100 Пдп
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 23 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/LeeNevi

Growth

477 August 2026 — 47 subscribers10 August 2026 — 47 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 46–48 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 13:4647no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:1847first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
71.8%
avg views ÷ 47 subscribers
Avg views / post
33.7
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held19 (23 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total641
Reactions total3
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 13:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
419
Videos
24
Links
77

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💘3100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 06:08 UTC38 viewsread 10 August 2026

Давайте в комментариях поздравим этого чудесного админа

28 Jul 2026, 06:07 UTC37 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @cornersNeelyPhoto

ᑎᗝᙐᗪᖘᗣᙖᙁᖆᙓᗰ ————————————————— ⲥⲉⲅⲟⲇⲏя ⲇⲉⲏь ⲣⲟⲿⲇⲉⲏυя ⲏⲁⲱⲉⲅⲟ ⲁⲇⲙυⲏⲁ ⲏυⲗⲗⲁ! [🎧]—«Ниᴧᴧ ᴨᴏɜдᴩᴀʙᴧяю ᴛᴇбя ᴄ днᴇʍ ᴩᴏждᴇния!Рᴀᴄᴛи бᴏᴧьɯᴏй нᴇ будь ᴧᴀᴨɯᴏй😈 Жᴇᴧᴀю ᴛᴇбᴇ ᴄчᴀᴄᴛья,ɜдᴏᴩᴏʙья,дᴇнᴇᴦ,чᴛᴏ бы ʙᴄᴇ ᴛʙᴏи ʍᴇчᴛы ʙᴄᴇᴦдᴀ ʙᴄᴇᴦдᴀ ᴄбыʙᴀᴧиᴄь. Я ᴄ ᴛᴏбᴏй ᴧичнᴏ нᴇɜнᴀᴋᴏʍᴀ нᴏ уʙᴇᴩᴇннᴀ чᴛᴏ ᴛы ᴨᴩᴇᴋᴩᴀᴄный чᴇᴧᴏʙᴇᴋ,ᴏᴄᴛᴀʙᴀйᴄя иʍ и дᴀᴧьɯᴇ.🫶🏻Ещᴇ жᴇᴧᴀю чᴛᴏ бы у ᴛᴇбя ʙᴄᴇᴦдᴀ ʙᴄᴇ ᴨᴏᴧучᴀᴧᴏᴄь,ᴄ ᴏɯибᴋᴀʍи иᴧи бᴇɜ,ᴇᴄᴧи дᴏᴧᴦᴏ ʍучᴀᴛьᴄя чᴛᴏ нибудь ᴨᴏᴧучиᴛᴄя.

26 Jul 2026, 11:40 UTC33 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @dior_solO_OiiPhoto

𝗆𝗒 𝖽𝗂𝗈𝗋 🪼⋆ ˚。⋆୨୧˚˚୨𝓓𝓲𝓸𝓻 𝓪𝓷𝓭... ˚。 ⋆୨˚˚୨୧🪼 Ꮶᖘᗣᗯ ᙁᑌᙅᙢ 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘥𝘪𝘰𝘳 𝘀𝗼𝗹𝗼 : @LeeNevi @yerinsolo @Choi_Haseul_Solo @eya_oi .・゜゜・ 𝗗𝗜𝗢𝗥 𝗦𝗢𝗟𝗢.・゜゜・ @SOHIport @sileri1 𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁 : @mitsunxlport .・゜゜・ 𝗗𝗜𝗢𝗥 𝗦𝗢𝗟𝗢.・゜゜・ 𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿/𝗹𝗮𝗯𝗲𝗹 : @wr_enter @victory_label 🐰 — порядок не имеет значения! так же, если кого-то не добавила, это не значит

24 Jul 2026, 11:50 UTC36 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @Morena_oiPhoto

Киа Неви, ты крути бро, но мне не пишешь, я на тебя обиделась, у нас такая огромная совместимость, а ты не уделяешь мне своего внимания, короче да, я обиделась. 😻 ➿ ➿ ➿ ➿ ➿ ➿ ➿ ɕπɑɕϞҕσ ʓɑ γ ʮɑɕᎿϞɛ ɞ ɱσёɱ ϞϰᎿɛ℘ɑκᎿϞɞɛ ɱϞλɑɯκɑ🤩

23 Jul 2026, 15:29 UTC37 viewsread 10 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

Signed 𝘥𝘪𝘰𝘳 ニャー。🧁

23 Jul 2026, 15:29 UTC37 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🐰 — пока киа уходит, я пытаюсь незаметно пробраться в бассейн с телефоном, который почему-то глючит

💘1

Signed 𝘥𝘪𝘰𝘳 ニャー。🧁

23 Jul 2026, 12:38 UTC40 viewsread 10 August 2026

🐰 — ты миньон

Signed 𝘥𝘪𝘰𝘳 ニャー。🧁

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @LeeNevi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,048,656 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“//Киа//ушла//” (@LeeNevi), 47 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LeeNevi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.