تعلم اللغة العربية مع مارية
هذه القناة تعليمية وخاصة
بدروس اللغة العربية
والكتب الصوتية
تسجيلات صوتية لمقالات علمية
منتخبات شعرية
فوائد لغوية
خواطر م م
قناة اليوتوب https://youtube.com/@learnarabicwithmaria?si=di-PrxEXTxgOvJLC
[email protected]
Created
Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
61 measurements spanning 98 days, net -165. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,266–10,485 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Nov 2026, 02:41
10,291
-8
10 Nov 2026, 01:31
10,299
-3
8 Nov 2026, 14:01
10,302
-14
7 Nov 2026, 05:50
10,316
-4
6 Nov 2026, 02:37
10,320
-9
4 Nov 2026, 23:37
10,329
-5
4 Nov 2026, 00:38
10,334
+1
3 Nov 2026, 00:17
10,333
-4
1 Nov 2026, 21:58
10,337
-4
31 Oct 2026, 20:55
10,341
+4
30 Oct 2026, 17:45
10,337
-1
29 Oct 2026, 15:59
10,338
-2
28 Oct 2026, 13:06
10,340
-1
27 Oct 2026, 12:10
10,341
-7
26 Oct 2026, 15:19
10,348
+4
25 Oct 2026, 16:17
10,344
+1
24 Oct 2026, 13:27
10,343
+1
23 Oct 2026, 15:09
10,342
-2
22 Oct 2026, 18:18
10,344
-1
21 Oct 2026, 10:48
10,345
first reading
Engagement
115 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.36%
avg views ÷ 10,291 subscribers
Avg views / post
345
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.704%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
39
of 115 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 24 of 39 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
115 (24 July 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
13,466
Reactions total
64
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Nov 2026, 11:53 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,950
Videos
≈253
Links
≈1,240
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
215 reactions across 70 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
156
72.6%
👏
15
6.98%
😢
10
4.65%
🤣
10
4.65%
💯
8
3.72%
👍
7
3.26%
💔
4
1.86%
👌
2
0.93%
🕊
2
0.93%
😡
1
0.465%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 73 of the 115 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 216 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 115 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 39 posts held from the last 30 days (5.13%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
من التأسيس إلى موعد اللقاء العلمي الدولي… مسيرة من العمل الأكاديمي والتواصل العلمي 🌍
بكل اعتزاز وسعادة، أرحّب بالباحثات والباحثين والأكاديميين والمهتمين من مختلف أنحاء العالم، للمشاركة في أشغال المؤتمر العلمي الدولي الثاني: «التوجهات الحديثة في التنمية المستدامة في ظل الذكاء الاصطناعي»، الذي تنعقد جلساته أيام 14 و16 و19 نوفمبر 2026.
يسعدني أن أكون جزءًا من هذا المسار العلمي منذ خطواته التأسيسية الأولى، وأن أواكب مراح…
وهذا ما يحدث في بعض العلاقات أيضًا. قد نعرف أن اعتذارًا صغيرًا قادر على تخفيف مسافة طويلة، وأن اتصالًا واحدًا قد يعيد فتح باب انغلق بسبب سوء فهم، وأن حديثًا صريحًا ربما يضع حدًا لحيرة استمرت أشهرًا. ومع ذلك نتردد. ننتظر أن يبدأ الطرف الآخر، أو أن تصبح الكلمات أسهل، أو أن تتغير الظروف، أو أن يمر الوقت بما يكفي كي لا نشعر بثقل اللحظة. ثم نكتشف أن ما كان يحتاج إلى شجاعة قصيرة أصبح يحتاج إلى شجاعة أكبر، وأن المسافة التي …
حين تصبح البدايات أصعب من النهايات
الإثنين 09 نوفمبر 2026
أنس تشكالا
أرشيف الكاتب
مقالات أخرى للكاتب
لماذا نريد أن يكون الآخرون مثلنا؟
حين تصبح المعرفة عبئًا
لماذا لا تكفينا الأشياء؟
حين نسيء فهم ما نراه
هل أصبحنا نخجل من أن نكون عاديين؟
ثمة أشياء كثيرة في حياتنا لا تنقصها الرغبة بقدر ما ينقصها البدء. فكرة نؤمن بها، ومشروع نحلم بإنجازه، وكتاب نريد تأليفه، وعلاقة نحتاج إلى إصلاحها، وقرار نعرف في أعماقنا أنه لم يعد يحت…
أجل، ومن شُغِل بإصلاح شأنه، واستفرغ وسعه في تهذيب عقله، وإنضاج أفكاره، لم يجد في يومه فضلًا يضيِّعه في تتبُّع شؤون الناس؛ فإن للمرء من عيوب نفسه ما يشغله عن عيوب غيره، ومن آماله ما هو أولى بوقته من أخبار سواه. حمدي إبراهيم
كان ذلك في تشرين الأول من تلك السنة، على شرفة بيته، وهي شرفة فسيحة يرى منها البحر في النهار، والمدينة المتلألئة أنوارها في الليل. أذكر نظرته في المساء، نظرة دهشة وحنين. فذلك البيت ملك له، وكان من قبل ملكا لأبيه وجده، فقد شيد في مطلع القرن الثامن عشر.
كانت أسرتي بدورها تملك فيما مضى منزلا جميلا في الجبل، ولكنه كان بيتا عائليا بالنسبة إلى أهلي، أما بالنسبة إلى أهله، فكان بيتهم وطنا، وقد شعر فيه مراد على الدوام بشيء من …
(علم اللغة النفسي واكتساب اللغة SLA):
هل تغير لغتك الثانية "بوصلتك الأخلاقية"؟ (The Foreign Language Effect)
في اللغويات التطبيقية، نحن نركز على "كيفية" اكتساب المتعلم (EFL) للغة، لكن ماذا عن تأثير هذه اللغة المكتسبة على شخصيته وقراراته الأخلاقية؟
التجربة الصادمة (معضلة القطار):
في عام 2014، أجرى باحثون تجربة "معضلة القطار" الشهيرة (Trolley Problem) على أشخاص ثنائيي اللغة. المعضلة تتطلب اتخاذ قرار أخلاقي بشع: هل تدفع…
عن سهل بن سعد رضي الله عنه : أن رسولَ اللهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم أُتِيَ بشرابٍ، فَشَرِبَ منهُ وعن يميِنِه غُلامٌ، وعن يسارِه الأشياخُ، فقالَ للغُلامِ: "أَتَأذَنُ لِي أنْ أُعْطِيَ هؤلاء؟"، فقالَ الغلامُ: لا واللهِ يا رسولَ اللهِ، لا أُوثِرُ بنَصِيبي منك أحداً. فَتَلَّهُ رسولُ اللهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم في يدِه.
متفق عليه
🌿 يا طائرَ البانِ… من روائع الشعر العربي القديم
نعود بكم إلى رحاب الشعر الجاهلي، وهذه المرة مع قصيدة «يا طائرَ البانِ» للشاعر الفارس عنترة بن شداد العبسي، أحد أبرز شعراء العصر الجاهلي، وصاحب المعلقة الشهيرة.
نقدم لكم القصيدة في أداء شعري مُغنّى، مصحوبًا بتدقيق لغوي لكتابة الأبيات وضبطها، وشرح لغوي لمعانيها، مع إضاءة على قيمتها وأهميتها الأدبية.
📚 محتوى يجمع بين متعة الاستماع، وجمال الشعر، والتعلم اللغوي، واكتشاف روائ…
Signed Dr Maria Meftahi 🇲🇦
Showing the 12 most recent of 115 posts we hold for @LearnArabicwithMaria. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @LearnArabicwithMaria as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
12 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
12 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
15 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 115 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Arabic, Tajweed & Islamics for All (Dr. Aya Taha 🌸🌿) @arabicfornonnatives · 26,759 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 September 2026
تعليم اللغة الإنجليزية Learn English @Pandora37 · 139,355 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 August 2026
كيف تتقن اللغة العربية @ahmedeskander4 · 45,258 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 27 August 2026
تعلم اللغة الانجليزية - AZ ENGLISH @azglish · 282,318 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
Qiyama Academy/Shikha Noha AsSersy @onlineTeaching2020 · 22,246 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 September 2026
كتب تعليم العربية لغير العرب @arabiay · 28,140 Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 September 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Learn Arabic with Maria” (@LearnArabicwithMaria), 10,291 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LearnArabicwithMaria.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
