Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

LeakAlarm 🔔

@LeakAlarm

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

148,380subscribers

-284 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002331034122
TypeChannel
Username@LeakAlarm
Description📢 Новости и слухи про утечки данных. 🚫 Рекламу не продаём и не покупаем! 🤖 @LeakAlarmBot ⚛️ @VKInfoRobot
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/LeakAlarm

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

148,380148,664148,5227 August 2026 — 148,664 subscribers8 August 2026 — 148,640 subscribers9 August 2026 — 148,586 subscribers10 August 2026 — 148,553 subscribers11 August 2026 — 148,450 subscribers12 August 2026 — 148,380 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 5 days, net -284. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 148,337–148,707 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 08:12148,380-70
11 Aug 2026, 05:12148,450-103
10 Aug 2026, 01:41148,553-33
9 Aug 2026, 00:55148,586-54
8 Aug 2026, 00:40148,640-24
7 Aug 2026, 15:02148,664first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 14 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.3%
avg views ÷ 148,380 subscribers
Avg views / post
22,700
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held19 (14 May 202630 July 2026)
Views total68,000
Reactions total681
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 18:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
89
Links
90

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

3,199 reactions across 19 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,70884.7%
👎49115.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,199reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
123
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 19 we hold a reading for · 42%
Most on one post
101
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @LeakAlarm. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 May 2026 to 30 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 13:18 UTC≈16,800 views133 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🚓🚓🚓 Основатель мессенджера Telegram Павел Дуров включен в перечень террористов и экстремистов Росфинмониторинга. Адвокат Сергей Жорин в беседе с «Газетой.Ru» дал своё разъяснение, является ли теперь покупка подписки или внутренней валюты в мессенджере уголовно наказуемой: «Покупка Telegram Premium или Stars сама по себе не образует состава преступления.» Но в то же время: Наказание повлечет донат «звездами» внутри п

👎111👍22

29 Jul 2026, 07:09 UTC≈18,700 views208 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🚓🚓🚓 Основателю мессенджера Telegram Павлу Дурову в рамках уголовного дела предъявлено обвинение по статье о содействии террористической деятельности, сообщила ФСБ России. Вот тебе и золотые купола. 🌐 @LeakAlarm 🚨 Не протекайте, друзья 🖥💦

👎178👍30

16 Jul 2026, 10:28 UTC≈32,500 views340 reactions7 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

👻👻👻 ГосМессенджер «Макс» куда-то пропал из Google Play. На запрос о поиске приложения магазин приложений выдает ответ: «Приложение недоступно». Также из Google Play пропало приложение VK. 🤖 @LeakAlarmBot 🌐 @LeakAlarm 🚨 Не протекайте, друзья 🖥💦

👍318👎22

26 Jun 2026, 11:12 UTC≈44,000 views364 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

😆😆😆 Администрация форк-клиента Telegram под названием "Telega" написала в своём канале, что он прекратит работу с 1 июля 2026 года. 🤖 @LeakAlarmBot 🌐 @LeakAlarm 🚨 Не протекайте, друзья 🖥💦

👍345👎19

25 Jun 2026, 14:07 UTC≈39,400 views324 reactions101 Starsread 12 August 2026

🍎🍎🍎 Apple без предупреждений удалила из App Store VK Музыку, VK Видео, VK Мессенджер, Одноклассники, почта Mail.ru и Дзен. Вот вам и ватафа пепе. Наблюдаем 👀 🤖 @LeakAlarmBot 🌐 @LeakAlarm 🚨 Не протекайте, друзья 🖥💦

👍291👎33

20 Jun 2026, 13:52 UTC≈43,000 views38 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

🌳🌳🌳 Департамент парков и дикой природы Техаса (TPWD) (https://tpwd.texas.gov) раскрыл инцидент с кибербезопасностью, затронувший поставщика системы лицензий на охоту и рыболовство, что потенциально может раскрыть личную информацию более 3 миллионов человек. ℹ️ Расследование показало, что неавторизованный субъект мог получить записи клиентов, содержащие: ⭕️ данные водительских прав; ⭕️ номера паспортов; ⭕️ адреса эле

👍31👎7

13 Jun 2026, 15:47 UTC≈42,900 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🌐🌐🌐 Nexstar Media Group (https://nexstar.tv) расследует инцидент с кибербезопасностью после того, как группа вымогателей ShinyHunters заявила, что украла более миллиона записей Salesforce и дополнительные внутренние корпоративные данные у вещательного гиганта. ℹ️ Злоумышленники получили данные 1,1 миллиона учетных записей пользователей. Украдены также данные, связанные с сотрудниками, включая имена, адреса электронн

👍20👎5

11 Jun 2026, 09:34 UTC≈34,100 views216 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @natalya_kasperskaya_channel

В понедельник Федеральный регулятор по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций, сокращенно называемый Роскомнадзор или РКН, провел встречу с компаниями-разработчиками ПО, куда пригласили и меня. Ну, о самой встрече я писать не буду — информация уже есть на просторах Рунета. На мой вопрос об эффективности блокировок высокий чиновник ответил, что они находят блокировки успешными. Я за

👍204👎12

4 Jun 2026, 17:55 UTC≈37,900 views748 reactions6 Starsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @polit1humorPhoto

При попытке найти мессенджер Max в App Store магазин предлагает скачать Telegram

👍738👎10

3 Jun 2026, 19:18 UTC≈41,500 views323 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

⚡️⚡️⚡️ Там поговаривают, что из AppStore удалили мессенджер MAX. 🤖 @LeakAlarmBot 🌐 @LeakAlarm 🚨 Не протекайте, друзья 🖥💦

👍316👎7

25 May 2026, 06:40 UTC≈51,700 views101 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🚔🚔🚔 В Нидерландах арестованы двое мужчин за содействие пророссийским кибератакам и нарушение санкций ЕС. Подозреваемые, владельцы хостинговых компаний (57-летний Юссеф Зинад и 39-летний Андрей Нестеренко), по версии следствия предоставляли инфраструктуру для атак на европейские цели, включая кибератаки на муниципальные выборы в Дании. ℹ️ Также, по мнению властей, подозреваемые косвенно предоставляли ресурсы российск

👍58👎43

24 May 2026, 12:33 UTC≈38,100 views45 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🍔🍔🍔 McDonald’s France (https://mcdonalds.fr) подтвердил взлом аккаунтов программы лояльности McDo+. ℹ️ Злоумышленники использовали украденные бонусные баллы для заказа еды по всей Франции, что вызвало массовые жалобы клиентов. ℹ️ Растущее число подобных жалоб вскоре появилось на Reddit, TikTok и X, где клиенты сообщали об отсутствии баллов лояльности и мошеннических заказах, привязанных к их учетным записям. 🤖 @Le

👍38👎7

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @LeakAlarm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 919,870 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“LeakAlarm 🔔” (@LeakAlarm), 148,380 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LeakAlarm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.