Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Human Nature

@Laws_of_Human_Nature

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10,025subscribers

-27 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001254736119
TypeChannel
Username@Laws_of_Human_Nature
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Laws_of_Human_Nature

Growth

10,02410,05210,0386 August 2026 — 10,052 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,052 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,045 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,037 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,036 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,030 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,028 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,024 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,025 subscribers10,0256 August 202615 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 9 days, net -27. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,020–10,056 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 11:5610,025+1
12 Aug 2026, 18:4810,024-4
11 Aug 2026, 18:3210,028-2
10 Aug 2026, 16:3410,030-6
9 Aug 2026, 15:1210,036-1
8 Aug 2026, 12:0710,037-8
7 Aug 2026, 09:1010,045-7
6 Aug 2026, 05:4510,052no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:3710,052first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 January 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

502 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
27855.4%
👍18136.1%
🔥183.59%
🤔50.996%
👌40.797%
👏40.797%
💩40.797%
💯30.598%
🤯20.398%
🤡10.199%
🤩10.199%
🥰10.199%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 502reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 January 2024 to 29 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Apr 2026, 05:37 UTC≈1,700 views12 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Power - the core arbiter of morality It is generally believed that moral values are based on principles innate to the human psyche. To many of us, the ideals of equality and justice seem as natural as the desire to survive and prosper. However, if one were to look beneath the surface of the supposed ‘noble human values’, one would find that the basis of these morals is not rooted in abstract ideas but in the exerci

12

Signed Sage Venu

22 Mar 2026, 11:10 UTC≈2,510 views18 reactionsread 15 August 2026

The Tolerance Paradox (Part II) While it may seem that a society that accepts every viewpoint with equal respect would be a utopia, the ground reality is that not everyone is willing to work together for a common goal. No matter how good a system is, there will always be flaws. There will always be people who would exploit the goodness of others for their nefarious purposes. Complacency, apathy and tolerance for t

12👍6

Signed Sage Venu

22 Mar 2026, 09:07 UTC≈1,960 views12 reactionsread 15 August 2026

The Tolerance Paradox (Part I) Human nature is inherently prone to divisiveness and conflict. Therefore, it seems logical that encouraging tolerance of diverse beliefs, opinions and behaviour would reduce, and possibly minimise, conflict and resulting violence. However, even a cursory glance at the world around us reveals an entirely different state of affairs. It is apparent that many, if not most, people advocate

11👍1

Signed Sage Venu

7 Mar 2026, 17:35 UTC≈2,480 views19 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Countering Dogma Countless prominent philosophers have emphasised the importance of rational thinking in human life. However, we often abandon reason in favour of the most pernicious enemy of intellect and rationality – commonly known as dogma. The term ‘dogma’ refers to a set of principles or beliefs that have been accepted as being true, and one may not debate or challenge them. Authority figures and even common

18🔥1

8 Feb 2026, 18:30 UTC≈2,860 views10 reactionsread 15 August 2026

The Noble Façade of Equality and Justice Human civilisation relies on certain principles and conventions that are held to be the foundations of a just society. It is widely believed that in the absence of these ideals, humans shall fall prey to their chaotic, brute nature. The two most significant of these ideals are: Equality and Justice. It is undeniable that humans intrinsically crave power - over their own dest

6🔥4

17 Jan 2026, 12:41 UTC≈3,150 views10 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Perils of an unexamined life During his trial in Athens around 399 BCE, the renowned Greek philosopher Socrates declared that “the unexamined life is not worth living” (ὁ δὲ ἀνεξέταστος βίος οὐ βιωτὸς ἀνθρώπῳ). He had been accused of impiety and corrupting the youth through his relentless questioning of the Athenian beliefs. His defiance ultimately led to his death sentence. It is pertinent to examine the reasons b

10

31 Dec 2025, 14:45 UTC≈3,600 views24 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Cogito, ergo sum One of the most notable quotes in Philosophy is René Descartes’s first principle: Cogito, ergo sum. It’s a Latin phrase which means “I think, therefore I am”. That which cannot think, does not exist. Ancient Greek philosophers such as Aristotle and Parmenides have expressed similar views regarding consciousness and existence. While there have been critiques of the said phrase and what it intrinsica

24

17 Oct 2025, 05:43 UTC≈4,680 views41 reactionsread 15 August 2026

The subjective nature of wisdom As humans, we often assume that wisdom is universal—that what’s true in one man’s life must apply equally well to another. Nothing could be further from the truth. Imagine a primitive man (Mr A), who has spent his entire life in the cold solitude of snowy mountains. His routine involves seeking warmth, conserving body heat, and surviving icy winds. Let’s now picture him talking to an

33🔥6💩2

13 Aug 2025, 14:29 UTC≈5,230 views28 reactionsread 15 August 2026

The Morality Conundrum: Good, Evil, and Hypocrisy In the course of our lives, we are often tempted to act upon our innate desires, even when they conflict with prevailing wisdom. Many times, we find ourselves yearning for things and actions that threaten to disrupt the social order and the professed civility of the modern world. The prominent among our forefathers tried multiple ways to establish certain “ground ru

23👏3👍1🤔1

30 Oct 2024, 15:34 UTC≈8,260 views10 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Enjoy our content? Advertise on this channel and reach a highly engaged audience! 👉🏻 It's easy with Telega.io. As the leading platform for native ads and integrations on Telegram, it provides user-friendly and efficient tools for quick and automated ad launches. ⚡️ Place your ad here in three simple steps: 1 Sign up 2 Top up the balance in a convenient way 3 Create your advertising post If your ad aligns with

👍62💩1🤩1

21 Jun 2024, 05:58 UTC≈10,600 views17 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Enjoy our content? Advertise on this channel and reach a highly engaged audience! 👉🏻 It's easy with http://Telega.io. As the leading platform for native ads and integrations on Telegram, it provides user-friendly and efficient tools for quick and automated ad launches. ⚡️ Place your ad here in three simple steps: 1 Sign up: https://telega.io/c/Laws_of_Human_Nature 2 Top up the balance in a convenient way 3 Creat

👍115💩1

9 May 2024, 17:59 UTC≈10,600 views44 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Breaking your Upper Limit Most people hold themselves back from real happiness. Most people don’t want to be happy, which is why they aren’t. They just don’t realize this is the case. People are programmed to chase their foremost desire at almost any cost. (Imagine the adrenaline-fueled superhuman powers people develop in life-or-death emergencies.) It’s just a matter of what that foremost desire is. Often enough, i

👍2317🤔2👏1🤯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Laws_of_Human_Nature. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,128,081 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Human Nature” (@Laws_of_Human_Nature), 10,025 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Laws_of_Human_Nature.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.