Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🇨🇦 Иммиграционный Адвокат

Channel

🇨🇦 Иммиграционный Адвокат

@Lawpoint_Canada

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

14,826subscribers

-114 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001338788052
TypeChannel
Username@Lawpoint_Canada
DescriptionКанадский иммиграционный адвокат. Ответы на сложные вопросы. ⚡️Чат без спама: @canadianlawyer ⚡️Канал без рекламы: @lawpoint_canada Контакты: [email protected] lawpoint.ca / lawpoint.ru Условия использования: lawpoint.ru/channel-terms-and-conditions/
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Lawpoint_Canada

Growth

14,82614,94014,8837 August 2026 — 14,940 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,940 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,935 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,931 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,920 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,915 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,907 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,894 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,883 subscribers15 August 2026 — 14,881 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,878 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,870 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,868 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,860 subscribers23 August 2026 — 14,851 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,844 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,836 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,831 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,835 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,836 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,833 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,831 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,830 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,826 subscribers7 August 20262 September 2026
24 measurements spanning 26 days, net -114. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,809–14,957 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 01:0414,826-4
1 Sept 2026, 01:3514,830-1
31 Aug 2026, 00:1414,831-2
30 Aug 2026, 03:4814,833-3
29 Aug 2026, 03:1314,836+1
27 Aug 2026, 23:5414,835+4
26 Aug 2026, 22:0314,831-5
25 Aug 2026, 23:5314,836-8
25 Aug 2026, 00:0514,844-7
23 Aug 2026, 08:3414,851-9
21 Aug 2026, 18:3614,860-8
20 Aug 2026, 12:4214,868-2
19 Aug 2026, 14:2214,870-8
17 Aug 2026, 10:4814,878-3
15 Aug 2026, 20:1814,881-2
14 Aug 2026, 10:4914,883-11
13 Aug 2026, 00:3314,894-13
11 Aug 2026, 21:3314,907-8
10 Aug 2026, 23:0514,915-5
10 Aug 2026, 02:3114,920first reading

Engagement

45 posts held, back to 29 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.9%
avg views ÷ 14,826 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,990
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.817%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 45 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held45 (29 June 20261 September 2026)
Views total107,760
Reactions total880
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 05:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
937
Videos
42
Links
1,650

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

1,634 reactions across 45 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍64939.7%
🤯33020.2%
🔥32019.6%
😁25715.7%
😢422.57%
🤬191.16%
👎171.04%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,634 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 22:41 UTC≈1,730 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Express Entry 2027: Канада может снова всё перекроить. Сегодня закрылись консультации министерства о том, каким быть категориям Express Entry в 2027 году. Рассматривается возможность сократить число профессиональных категорий или сузить требования по ним — мест в иммиграционном плане не хватает. Вместо этого обсуждают охоту за global talent: специалисты по AI, доценты с кандидатами, ускоренный путь для обладателей

😁2🤯1

1 Sept 2026, 18:16 UTC≈2,150 views13 reactionsread 2 September 2026

С сегодняшнего дня Nova Scotia взимает processing fees за заявления на номинацию: $1,000 для основных стримов и $2,000 для Entrepreneur stream. liveinnovascotia.com/resources/nsnp-update-application-fees-effective-september-1-2026 #ns 🇨🇦 Иммиграционный Адвокат | Подписаться

👍9👎3😁1

1 Sept 2026, 16:08 UTC≈2,300 views24 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Ну что, дожили. По провинциальной программе Express Entry выдаёт ITA с проходным баллом 697. А это значит, что без шестисот баллов, которые за номинацию дарит провинция, сам по себе кандидат набирает всего 97 баллов в Express Entry! Вот калькулятор: lawpoint.ru/calc. Попробуйте прокачать в нём кандидата, который набирает ровно 97 баллов, и при этом будет eligible для Express Entry. Посмотрим, что это за ценные кад

🤯16🔥4😁4

1 Sept 2026, 15:01 UTC≈2,290 views26 reactionsread 2 September 2026

В Федеральный суд недавно назначили нового шефа, и он рассказал всякое интересное в свежем материале CityNews. Сам он в суде с 2014 года — в те времена Федеральный суд получал от 5 до 6 тысяч иммиграционных кейсов в год. В 2026 году ожидается больше 33 тысяч кейсов, и это только иммиграционных, которые составляют 86% от общего числа. Только Bill C-12 (тот, которым сурово урезали eligibility для беженцев) дал больш

🔥14😁8😢2👍1🤯1

31 Aug 2026, 19:14 UTC≈2,620 views17 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Британская Колумбия в этом году отдаёт до 39% общих квот на номинации всего лишь двум группам профессий — healthcare workers и early childhood educators. Из 6,254 номинаций, выделенных на 2026 год, эти профессии получат до 2,455 мест. Это сказано в том же документе — BC PNP Statistical Report and Year in Review 2025. #bc 🇨🇦 Иммиграционный Адвокат | [email protected]

🔥10👍5👎2

31 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC≈2,740 views16 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Интересную инструкцию для тех, кто обращается в суд, выложило министерство иммиграции. При обращении в суд в заявлении нужно указывать, получено ли письменное обоснование оспариваемого решения. В инструкции IRCC говорит, что несмотря на то, что письменное обоснование теперь идёт «в комплекте» к большинству отказов, на обязательный вопрос «получили ли вы письменное обоснование?» всё равно нужно отвечать «нет, не пол

🤯12😁4

28 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC≈3,710 views22 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Британская Колумбия показала, к чему ведут выборки по проходным долларам вместо проходных баллов. Опубликован отчёт за 2025 год, в котором явно видна разница с предыдущим годом: если в 2024 средняя зарплата квалифицированных кандидатов составляла $29.00 в час, то в 2025 она уже достигла $41.42 в час. Для одного года это прорыв — Рост сразу на 42%! 🚀 BC PNP всё меньше становится инструментом получения ПМЖ для средне

👍14🤬4🔥2😢2

28 Aug 2026, 14:37 UTC≈3,440 views24 reactionsread 2 September 2026

На этой неделе IRCC опубликовало кое-какие циферки для парламентского комитета (не для нас, поэтому никакого публичного анонса не было). 📉 Там например сказано, что в 2025 году по сравнению с 2024 выдача PGWP упала на 15%, work permit'ов для членов семей иностранных работников выдано меньше на 34%, а для членов семей иностранных студентов — на 73%. Пожалуй про падение в 73% можно сказать, что «показатель рухнул».

👍23👎1

27 Aug 2026, 19:33 UTC≈3,660 views35 reactionsread 2 September 2026

🇺🇸 Недавно Штаты сделали интересную вещь — за дополнительную плату можно быстренько назначить интервью при подаче на гостевую визу. Визовое интервью — больная тема, сроки ожидания просто ужас, народ летает в другие страны чтобы побыстрее пройти (из Торонто популярным направлением был Барбадос). В рамках пилотного проекта до конца года можно к стандартной пошлине в $185 доплатить $750 и назначить интервью в течение 1

🔥26😁5👎3👍1

27 Aug 2026, 16:06 UTC≈3,110 views32 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Низы так не хотят, а верхи иначе не могут — кажется потихоньку начинает доходить всё выше и выше, что нынешняя иммиграционная система Канады никуда не годится. Практикующие специалисты в эти дни обсуждают простой вопрос: как кандидат с Express Entry CRS 382 может быть лучше кандидата с CRS 523? Почему приоритеты смещены в сторону довольно абстрактного критерия «он говорит на французском» (382 балла, франкофонная вы

👍32

26 Aug 2026, 14:52 UTC≈3,230 views27 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Что Канада затягивает #гайки, в том числе иностранным студентам, известно давно. Занятная ситуация связана с этим в Альберте. Пару лет назад в одном из колледжей (Portage College) студенты и абитуриенты, убоявшись перемен, стали выяснять что к чему. Запросили колледж, чтобы понимать, стоит ли вообще связываться с этой затеей — давно не секрет, что на саму учёбу большинству иностранных студентов начхать, они на пары

🔥10👍7😁6😢3🤯1

25 Aug 2026, 19:43 UTC≈3,530 views37 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Довольно интересную подборку фактов только что опубликовал Белый Дом. 🇨🇦 Иммиграционный Адвокат | Подписаться

😁25🤬5🤯4👎2🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @Lawpoint_Canada. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Lawpoint_Canada edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
29 August 2026
Most recent edit
29 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 517,409 of 1,629,535 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🇨🇦 Иммиграционный Адвокат” (@Lawpoint_Canada), 14,826 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Lawpoint_Canada.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.