Хотели бы себе такой G22? 👍 - Даа
👍581👎56💩12❤6🖕3🗿3😡2👻1

Channel
@LaughterXD
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,196subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001952291696 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LaughterXD |
| Created | 14 August 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LaughterXD |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:22 | 1,196 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:30 | 1,196 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 14 August 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1,546 reactions across 11 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 694 | 44.9% | |
| ❤ | 334 | 21.6% | |
| 😍 | 137 | 8.86% | |
| 👎 | 76 | 4.92% | |
| 💊 | 64 | 4.14% | |
| 😱 | 61 | 3.95% | |
| 🤣 | 51 | 3.30% | |
| 💩 | 50 | 3.23% | |
| 🖕 | 16 | 1.03% | |
| 🍾 | 13 | 0.841% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 0.647% | |
| 😢 | 7 | 0.453% | |
| 🤮 | 6 | 0.388% | |
| 😡 | 4 | 0.259% | |
| 🤡 | 4 | 0.259% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 0.194% | |
| 🗿 | 3 | 0.194% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 0.194% | |
| 💅 | 2 | 0.129% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 0.129% | |
| 6 further kinds | 6 | 0.388% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,546reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2023 to 6 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @LaughterXD. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 August 2023 to 6 February 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Хотели бы себе такой G22? 👍 - Даа
👍581👎56💩12❤6🖕3🗿3😡2👻1
Бустят 📈 Был: 0.60G Пик пока что: 1.92G
👍48💩13🖕11🔥2🤡1😱1
🥰Самые имбовые сеты со скинами из бандла! Какой нравится больше всего?
💊49👍21💩8❤6👎4💅2🔥2🤬2
❌ Бан за использование бага на оружие в начале раунда! В коммьюнити появился скриншот одного из багоюзеров. Он является подлинным.
👍28😱10💊4👎3💩1🖕1🫡1
⚡️ Разработчик замечен на версии 0.32.3!
😱19💊4💩3👍2👎1
Бустят Остальные новости завтра
😱31👍6👎4💊3💩1
Какой авм лучше?
❤251😍137🔥5💊4💩4
Всех с наступающим Новым годом!🥰
❤43💩7🤮6🥰1
Как отмечаешь Новый год? 🎄
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤13👎8🤡3👍1
Что ты выберешь?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤12👀3🤩3👍1🥴1🙈1
Где отмечаете Новый год?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🤣51🍾13😢7👍6❤3💩1🔥1
Channel created
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @LaughterXD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как отмечаешь Новый год? 🎄
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Что ты выберешь?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Где отмечаете Новый год?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2023 to 6 February 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Смешно — и точка” (@LaughterXD), 1,196 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LaughterXD.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.